Retreatment after loss of follow-up in adolescent and young adult patients living with HIV: a case-control study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7973.4802Keywords:
Retreatment; Lost to Follow-Up; Adolescents; Young Adult; HIV; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.Abstract
Objective: to identify factors associated with retreatment after loss to follow-up among adolescents and young adults living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Method: paired case-control study (1:1 ratio) with data collection from medical records. The cases were adolescents and young adults diagnosed with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome who underwent retreatment after loss to follow-up. The controls were adolescents and young adults diagnosed with the disease who were lost to follow-up and had no history of retreatment. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Results: 76 cases and 76 controls were included. The variable associated with the highest chance of retreatment was not having a religion (ORaj: 3.46; 95% CI: 1.52-7.88; p=0.003). The factors that decreased the chances of retreatment were 21.91 years of age at the beginning of follow-up (ORaj: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.98; p=0.039), female gender (ORaj: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03-0.45; p=0.001), living in an institution (ORaj: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.12-0.43; p=0.004), alcohol use (ORaj: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.49; p<0.001), diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus at the Treatment and Counseling Center (ORaj: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.74; p=0.008), and missed appointment(s) before loss to follow-up (ORaj: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.07-0.52; p=0.001). Conclusion: the return to treatment of adolescents and young people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus is multifactorially determined by sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical profiles.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.