Educational intervention for nursing professionals on palliative care: quasi-experimental study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8026.4823Keywords:
Palliative Care; Nursing Team; Continuing Nursing Education; Knowledge; Self Efficacy; Tertiary Healthcare.Abstract
Objective: to assess nursing professionals› knowledge and self-efficacy regarding palliative care before and after an educational intervention. Method: a quasi-experimental study conducted in a teaching hospital with nursing professionals who care for adults and the elderly. Data collection was performed at two times: first, a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Bonn Palliative Care Knowledge Test, which assesses knowledge and self-efficacy in palliative care, were administered; immediately afterward, an educational intervention on the topic was conducted. Four weeks later, the instrument that assesses knowledge and self-efficacy was reapplied. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Results: 179 professionals participated, with an average age of 40.17 years and a predominance of females. The knowledge score obtained higher averages after the intervention (pre-test=11.77; post-test=15.03), while the self-efficacy score was lower (pre-test=3.21; post-test=3.38), but both were statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusion: the educational intervention was effective in increasing knowledge and self-efficacy in palliative care among nursing professionals. These results may support the development and dissemination of palliative care practices in health services.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.