Intra-peer violence, socioeconomic and behavioral characteristics of sexual and gender diverse adolescents: a cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7920.4865Keywords:
Adolescents; Gender Diversity; Bullying; Cyberbullying; Violence; Socioeconomic Profile.Abstract
Objective: to identify the socioeconomic and behavioral profile of adolescents who self-identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transvestite, transgender, and others, as well as their experiences of peer violence and its motivations. Method: a cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted among 949 adolescents aged 14 to 19 years, using self-administered electronic questionnaires, which were analyzed using crude and relative frequencies and 95% confidence intervals. Results: cisgender adolescents (81.0%), middle-class students (44.7%), Black or Brown students (57.4%), and public-school students (67.2%) predominated. The prevalence of bullying was 67.8%, with 13.0% motivated by sexual orientation, and cyberbullying was identified in 11.5%. Condom use was higher during the first sexual intercourse (50.7%) than during the last (40.3%). Current alcohol use was around 47.2%, cigarette use was 9.1%, and drug use was 15.1%. Conclusion: it is concluded that the adolescents in this study face high rates of violence, social exclusion, and behavioral vulnerabilities, reinforcing the need for integrated strategies to promote inclusive and safe environments, as well as public policies aimed at equity and health for this population.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.