Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding disaster preparedness among nursing students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8135.4856Keywords:
Nursing; Nursing Students; Knowledge; Attitudes; Practices; Disaster Preparedness.Abstract
Objective: to analyze the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding disaster preparedness among nursing students, in a municipality highly vulnerable to natural disasters, in relation to their preparation for such events. Method: a questionnaire was administered to 363 students, with a mean age of 21.54 years, most of whom were women (78.51%). Results: 97.25% demonstrated adequate knowledge about disasters; however, only 66.67% were familiar with their college’s evacuation procedures. In terms of attitudes, 93.11% showed a positive disposition toward disaster preparedness, although only 26.72% had received continuing academic training on the subject. Regarding practices, only 20.39% reported adequate actions in emergency situations, and 19.01% considered that their university was prepared to face a natural disaster. A positive correlation was identified between the level of knowledge and practices, suggesting that a higher level of knowledge favors the application of effective measures in emergency contexts. Conclusion: although nursing students demonstrated favorable knowledge and attitudes, practices remain limited. These findings highlight the need to reinforce practical training in disaster management to strengthen their capacity to respond to emergencies.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.