Analysis of nursing consultations for people with systemic arterial hypertension in Primary Health Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7998.4877Keywords:
Hypertension; Primary Health Care; Office Nursing; Nursing Process; Clinical Protocols; Nursing Care.Abstract
Objective: to analyze nursing consultations with people with systemic arterial hypertension in primary health care according to the Brazilian Guidelines for Arterial Hypertension, the stages of the Nursing Process, and clinical communication. Method: a cross-sectional analytical study that evaluated 29 nursing consultations performed by 13 nurses with users with arterial hypertension in four Brazilian states. The consultations were assessed using a structured checklist. The data were subjected to descriptive and bivariate analyses, using tables and graphs to characterize the sample and explore potential associations among variables. Results: there was low adherence to the Nursing Process and the recommendations of the Brazilian Guidelines for Hypertension. Only 20% of the steps in the Nursing Process were fully complied with. Specifically, regarding the Guidelines, there was a lack of fundamental actions, such as blood pressure measurement, risk factor assessment, and communication of the diagnosis. Conclusion: there was a weakness in the application of the Nursing Process in consultations with people with hypertension. Factors such as case complexity, interruptions, high work demands, gaps in training, and the absence of structured protocols contributed to these findings.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.