Temporal and spatial analysis of low birth weight cases in Sergipe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8113.4871Keywords:
Premature Newborn; Prenatal Care; Pregnancy; Spatial Analysis; Premature Birth; Temporal Distribution.Abstract
Objective: to conduct a temporal and spatial time-series analysis of low birth weight cases in the Sergipe state from 2013 to 2023, identifying regions with the highest rates. Method: data from live births in the state, provided by the State Health Department, were analyzed. Kernel density maps were generated by municipality, and time-series analyses were conducted by health region. Results: between 2013 and 2023, the state recorded 370,329 births, of which 30,999 newborns weighed less than 2,500 grams (8.4%). According to the Kernel density map, the municipalities of Nossa Senhora do Socorro followed by Propriá presented the highest LBW rates. Time-series analysis showed a decreasing trend in the Nossa Senhora da Glória and Nossa Senhora do Socorro regionals. Conclusion: LBW cases were spatially clustered, and most health regions exhibited stationary trends.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.