Participatory development of strategies to combat congenital syphilis: action research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8014.4895Keywords:
Congenital Syphilis; Delivery of Health Care; Health Services Research; Health Planning; Patient Care Bundles; Primary Health Care.Abstract
Objective: to describe the development of a strategic action plan to combat congenital syphilis, carried out in a participative manner with professionals from the Health Care Network. Method: qualitative research, using an action research approach based on Freire’s framework. Conducted in a municipality in the interior of São Paulo, it involved 56 health professionals. The absence of local strategies and epidemiological data led to the holding of a workshop in three meetings. The activities were recorded on murals, written evaluations, and field diaries, and analyzed using Content Analysis. Results: the meetings promoted the involvement of professionals, revealed weaknesses in the management of syphilis, and prompted the formulation of proposals, such as restructuring testing and diagnosis flows, timely prescription and treatment, active search, monitoring tests, treatment of partners, and adequate management of syphilis cases in pregnant women. Three categories emerged, and as a final product, a strategic action plan was developed to address congenital syphilis with practical applicability in the network’s services. Conclusion: the collaborative process strengthened professionals’ autonomy and co-responsibility, integrating technical knowledge and local experience. The plan has been implemented and has contributed to improving the response to congenital syphilis within the Brazilian Unified Health System.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.