Deaf nursing professionals: experiences of social interaction and communication in professional practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8211.4913Keywords:
Deafness; Nursing; Social Inclusion; Professional Practice; Social Interaction; Communication.Abstract
Objective: to explore the inclusion of deaf nursing professionals in terms of attitudinal and communicational accessibility in the workplace. Method: qualitative, cross-sectional, descriptive study based on the history of the inclusion of people with disabilities and Sassaki’s seven dimensions of accessibility. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with deaf nursing professionals. The analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s Thematic Analysis method. Results: eight professionals participated, including six nurses and two nursing technicians, with mild-to-profound hearing loss. Two main themes emerged-Accessibility and Barriers-and four subthemes: attitudinal accessibility (representation, support, and inclusive coexistence) and communicational accessibility (use of adapted communication strategies); attitudinal barriers (ableism, invisibility of deafness, and discrimination) and communicational barriers (protective masks, noisy environments, use of writing, and auditory fatigue). Despite occasional advances, structural and cultural barriers persist that hinder the full inclusion of these professionals. Conclusion: the inclusion of people with hearing loss in nursing remains partial, particularly in attitudes and communication. The presence of these professionals contributes to raising awareness about deafness, reducing stigma, and strengthening accessibility practices, all of which are essential to a more diverse and equitable nursing profession.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
