Symbolic Interactionism and Grounded Theory in research on the health of children and adolescents: a scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7900.4934Keywords:
Symbolic Interactionism; Grounded Theory; Adolescent Health; Child; Review; Health.Abstract
Objective: to map the theoretical-methodological application of Symbolic Interactionism and Grounded Theory in research on the health of children and adolescents. Method: a scoping review conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the JBI. The following elements were considered: Participants - children and/or adolescents, family members, and professionals; Concepts - Symbolic Interactionism and Grounded Theory; Context - not delimited. Nine electronic sources were consulted, including original articles, without language or time restrictions. Rayyan and NVivo software were used for study selection and data synthesis. Results: fifty-nine studies were included. Most participants were adolescents (49%) and family members (40%). Regarding the theoretical perspective, 42% adopted Blumer’s framework and 67% Strauss’s methodology. The combination of data collection strategies was reported in 34% of the studies; analytical resources such as diagrams and memos were cited in 42% and 39% of the studies, respectively. Only 24% reported theory validation. The hospital setting was the most frequently investigated context (27%). Conclusion: the combination of data collection strategies enables greater analytical diversity and investigations across different sociocultural and intersectoral contexts, contributing to the development of substantive theories. Future studies including the simultaneous participation of children, adolescents, family members, and professionals are recommended.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.