Educational technology on chronic non-communicable diseases for Haitian immigrants in the Creole language: a validation study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8103.4922Keywords:
Noncommunicable Diseases; Emigrants and Immigrants; Validation Study; Educational Technology; Nursing; Health Education.Abstract
Objective: to validate the content and semantics of an educational technology in the Creole language, in the form of a guide, for the prevention and self-care of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases for Haitian immigrants. Method: this is a validation study of educational technology with regard with its content and semantic attributes. There were 17 healthcare professionals experts (Portuguese version) and 30 Haitian immigrants (Creole version) who took part in the content validation. In the content validation, an instrument was used that assessed the target domains, structure/presentation and content relevance of the guide by means of a four-point ordinal scale, and the Concordance Index was sought in the analysis; a semantic validation was performed using the Suitability Assessment of Materials tool, and an analysis was performed using the SAM score. Results: the overall Concordance Index attribute was 91%; and for the semantic attribute, the SAM score was of 25.8 points. Conclusion: the educational technology received content and semantic validation, indicating its appropriateness for mediating educational actions of Chronic Non-Communicable Disease prevention and self-care among Haitian immigrants.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.