Self-care practices and associated factors in people with Hansen’s disease in Primary Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7921.4962Keywords:
Practice; Self-care; Leprosy; Primary Health Care; Nursing; Early Diagnosis.Abstract
Objective: to analyze self-care practices and associated factors in people with Hansen’s disease in Primary Health Care. Method: a cross-sectional study was conducted in Basic Health Units with 133 cases of Hansen’s disease. The instrument “Attitude and Practice of Self-Care in Leprosy - face, hands and feet” was used. The chi-square and/or Fisher’s exact test, with Yates correction, was used to analyze the association between variables. Logistic regression was applied to analyze self-care practices, with Odds Ratio and respective confidence intervals. Results: males predominated (54.1%), who were 20 to 59 years old (62.4%), married (60.9%), and income of one to two minimum wages (48.9%). The attitude towards self-care was positive (98.5%). Among the participants, only 4.5% performed self-care practices related to the face, hands (12.8%) and feet (5.3%). Having plantar or palmar ulcers and neuritis was associated with a reduced likelihood of unsatisfactory self-care. Conclusion: the attitude towards self-care was positive in the vast majority of participants, showing dissonance with self-care practices, which were predominantly unsatisfactory. Self-care in Hansen’s disease is essential for the prevention of sequelae and requires that healthcare professionals develop continuous guidance and monitoring, aiming at improving quality of life.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.