Effectiveness of health education in the self-care and adherence of patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518.8345.4281.3389%20Keywords:
Self Care; Heart Failure; Patient Complicance; Health Education; Health Outcome; Treatment Adherence and ComplianceAbstract
Objective:to evaluate in the literature the effectiveness of the health education interventions in self-care and adherence to treatment of patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
Method:a systematic review with meta-analysis. Studies were selected that compared health education interventions with the usual care to assess the outcomes of adherence and self-care. The quality of the methodological evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
Results:the educational interventions were more effective in relation to the usual care in the outcome of adherence (fixed effect=0-3841; p-value <0.001). There was no statistical difference in the outcome of self-care (fixed effect=0.0063; p-value=0.898).
Conclusion:the educational interventions improved the outcome of adherence, though not self-care in the patient with Heart Failure.
Downloads
References
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 RLAE RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
