Telehealth in primary health care: a study of activities and time spent by professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7255.4501Keywords:
Nursing , Primary Health Care , Telemedicine , Time and Motion Studies , Health Services, Professional PracticeAbstract
Objective: to describe the telehealth activities carried out by professionals in Primary Health Care (PHC). Method: descriptive observational study, using time-motion methodology. The sample consisted of 31 Family Health teams, 14 Oral Health teams and two multidisciplinary teams working in PHC. An adapted workload instrument was used to collect the data. A descriptive analysis of the data was carried out considering the total time, average time and percentage of activities according to professional category and telehealth modality. Results: 632 telehealth activities were observed, representing 2.67% of all activities. The most used modality was voice calls (60.28%). The average nursing consultation time was 4.86 minutes and 6.17 minutes for medical consultations. The greatest number of telehealth activities and time spent in PHC was carried out by the nursing team. Conclusion: PHC professionals carry out a variety of telehealth activities, predominantly by voice connection, with the nursing team being the most expressive. In addition, the study shows the time dedicated and the distribution of activities, supporting discussions on the planning and sizing of the digital health workforce.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
