Methodological characteristics of evaluative studies of drug prevention programs in Brazil: scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7709.4579Keywords:
Programs; Prevention; Review; Drug Abuse; Brazil; Public PolicyAbstract
Objective: to map studies that have developed evaluation processes of prevention programs for the use of alcohol and other drugs in Brazil, analyzing their methodological characteristics. Method: a scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. The searches were carried out in eight databases and a theses and dissertations database, screened with double-blind in Rayyan®, analyzed with a focus on the methodology of the evaluative studies and through qualitative synthesis. Results: of the 56 publications included, the majority used an observational design, generally related to process evaluations (n = 26), followed by experimental (n = 23) and quasi-experimental (n = 8) analyses of results in terms of effectiveness and efficacy, respectively. Of the eleven actions analyzed, eight are universal prevention programs, one is selective prevention and two are a preventive strategy. Conclusion: most of the programs evaluated are universal, aimed at adolescents, carried out in schools and focused on various drugs. It is recommended to focus on new groups, such as Indigenous populations and other risk conditions, and to develop selective programs in future government initiatives to prevent drug use in Brazil.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.