Analysis of methodological procedures of studies about wheelchair users satisfaction: a scope review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v35i1-3e231353Keywords:
Wheelchairs, User satisfaction, Health services, Assistive technologyAbstract
Introduction: Wheelchairs are a priority assistive product. The use of a wheelchair with adequate configuration can contribute to the user's autonomy, participation and quality of life, while the use of a wheelchair with inadequate configurations can negatively impact health and cause functional limitations. Objective: To identify the methodological procedures of studies on the satisfaction of wheelchair users regarding the product and associated services. Method: This is a scoping review based on the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Most studies used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design. It also stands out, samples composed of users of manual wheelchairs with varied diagnoses. Most studies pointed to good levels of satisfaction with the wheelchairs and lower levels with follow-up services. Conclusion: It is necessary to develop further studies in countries in South America and Asia, which investigate not only satisfaction with the resource, but also explore in detail the services based on the 8 stages recommended by the WHO.
Downloads
References
Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Lista de Produtos Assistivos Prioritários. Genebra: Organização Mundial da Saúde; 2017 [citado em 12 out. 2020]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/207694/WHO-EMP-PHI-2016.01-por.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y.
World Health Organization (WHO). Summary: world report on disability 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 [citado em 26 jun. 2025]. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability.
Medola FO, Elui VMC, Santana CS, Fortulan CA. Aspects of manual wheelchair configuration affecting mobility: a review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];26(2):313-8. Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3944313/.
Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];14(3):101-5 Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228437673_The_Quebec_User_Evaluation_of_Satisfaction_with_Assistive_Technology_QUEST_20_An_overview_of_recent_progress .
Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Diretrizes para o fornecimento de cadeiras de rodas manuais em locais com poucos recursos. São Paulo: Secretaria de Estado dos Direitos da Pessoa com Deficiência de São Paulo; 2008 [citado em 12 out. 2020]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43960/9789241547482_por.pdf?sequence=38&isAllowed=y.
Ferretti EC, Curi HT, Andrade LF, Cooper RA, Soárez PC. Conceptual mapping proposed to comprehend the effect of wheelchair mobility on social participation and quality of life: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];1–17. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2126904.
Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];52(4):516–26. pmid: 26784731.
Costa CR, Ferreira FMRM, Bortolus MV, Carvalho MGR. Dispositivos de tecnologia assistiva: fatores relacionados ao abandono. Cad Ter Ocupacional UFSCar. 2015 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];23(3):611–24. Disponível em: https://www.cadernosdeterapiaocupacional.ufscar.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1016.
Missio MM, Queiroz LF. Tecnologias assistivas: aspectos que influenciam na assiduidade e no abandono dos recursos. Acta Fisiátrica. 2018 [citado em 15 de janeiro de 2023]; Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/163858.
Garg R. Methodology for research I. Indian J Anaesth [Internet]. 2016 [citado 3 de maio de 2023];60(9):640–5. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037944/.
Kallet RH. How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respir Care. 2004 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];49(10):1229–32. pmid: 15447808.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];169(7):467–73. pmid: 30178033.
Santos CMC, Pimenta CAM, Nobre MRC. A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Rev Lat Am Enferm. 2007 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];15:508–11. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/CfKNnz8mvSqVjZ37Z77pFsy/?format=pdf&lang=pt.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];5(1):210. Disponível em: https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 [citado 11 de janeiro de 2023];71. Disponível em: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Fuchs RH, Gromak PA. Wheelchair use by residents of nursing homes: effectiveness in meeting positioning and mobility needs. Assist Technol. 2003 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];15(2):151–63. pmid: 15137732.
Chan SC, Chan AP. User satisfaction, community participation and quality of life among Chinese wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study. Occup Ther Int. setembro de 2007 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];14(3):123–43. pmid: 17624872.
Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Kelleher A, Cooper RA. Satisfaction related to wheelchair use in older adults in both nursing homes and community dwelling. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];4(5):337–43. pmid: 19565374.
de Groot S, Post MWM, Bongers-Janssen HMH, Bloemen-Vrencken JH, van der Woude LHV. Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord. 2011 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];49(4):560–5. pmid: 21042333.
Sund T, Iwarsson S, Andersen MC, Brandt Å. Documentation of and satisfaction with the service delivery process of electric powered scooters among adult users in different national contexts. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];8(2):151–60. pmid: 22804870.
Malapel-Empis H, Saragoni A, Guyot M, Donze C. Evaluation of user’s satisfaction after their first acquisition of an electric-powered wheelchair. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];56:e173. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270937540_Evaluation_of_user's_satisfaction_after_their_first_acquisition_of_an_electric-powered_wheelchair.
Ward AL, Hammond S, Holsten S, Bravver E, Brooks BR. Power Wheelchair use in persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: changes over time. Assist Technol. 2015 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];27(4):238–45. pmid: 26691564.
Marchiori C, Bensmail D, Gagnon D, Pradon D. Manual wheelchair satisfaction among long-term users and caregivers: a French study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];52(2):181–92. pmid: 26237295.
Amosun S, Ndosi A, Buchanan H. Locally manufactured wheelchairs in Tanzania: are users satisfied? Afr Health Sci. 2017 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];16(4):1174. pmid: 28479912/.
Sund T, Brandt Å. Adult Scandinavians’ use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(3):212–9. pmid: 28366104
Silva ICN, Alves ACJ. Identificação das tecnologias assistivas no esporte paralímpico: contribuições e barreiras. Cad Bras de Ter Ocup. 2025 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];28(3):917-930. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/cadbto/a/ypq3SKT6tdtNFRSzVwKcnhp/. doi: 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1933
Štefanac S, Grabovac I, Fristedt S. Wheelchair users satisfaction with the prescribed wheelchairs and wheelchair services in Croatia. Gesundheitswesen; 2020 [citado em 18 de março de 2023];82(5):465. Disponível em: https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0040-1709003. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709003
Geilen BG, de Witte L, Norman G, George CE. Quality of wheelchair services as perceived by users in rural Bangalore district, India: a cross-sectional survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];17(8):965–73. pmid: 33244999.
Berardi A, Galeoto G, Lucibello L, Panuccio F, Valente D, Tofani M. Athletes with disability’ satisfaction with sport wheelchairs: an Italian cross sectional study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];16(4):420–4. pmid: 32730722
Oholeguy AA, Barbalaco L, Di Prinzio MF, Silva N, Annarattone AV, Cazurro ME, et al. Calce, apoyo postural, seguridad y satisfacción de usuarios de sillas de ruedas en un Instituto de Rehabilitación de CABA: estudio descriptivo. Rev Fac Cienc Médicas Córdoba. 2020 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];77(4):312–7. Disponível em: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/28142.
Gudjonsdottir B, Gudmundsdottir SB. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];1-8. pmid: 34102088.
Evans S, Frank AO, Neophytou C, de Souza L. Older adults’ use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. Age Ageing. 2007 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];36(4):431–5. pmid: 17384418.
Balser AE, Howell DM, O’Brien SP. User Perspectives on the Service Delivery of Complex Power Wheelchairs. Occup Ther Health Care. 2021 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];35(1):57–74. pmid: 33380249
Visagie, S. et al. Impact of structured wheelchair services on satisfaction and function of wheelchair users in Zimbabwe. Afr J Disabil. 2016 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];5(1):222. Doi:10.4102/ajod. v5i1.222. Disponível em: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5433454/. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v5i1.222
Galvao CRC, Cavalcante PMA, Cavalcanti A, Barroso BIL, Olinda RA, Santos S, Lancman S. Fatores associados ao uso e grau de satisfação com cadeira de rodas na Síndrome Spoa. Rev Ter Ocup Univ Sao Paulo. 2020 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];30(3):174–82. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/rto/article/view/157805.
Suzuki KM, Lockerte G, Braun KL. Client satisfaction survey of a wheelchair seating clinic. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2000 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];17(2):55-65. Disponível em: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315821504-5/client-satisfaction-survey-wheelchair-seating-clinic-kathy-suzuki-ginger-lockette?context=ubx.
Bergström AL, Samuelsson K. Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];1(3):175–82. pmid: 19260185
Medola FO, Gamac S, M.C. Eluic VMC, Paschoarelliab LC, Fortuland CA. Users’ perceptions on mobility, comfort and usability of manual wheelchairs. In: Rebelo F, Soares M (editors). Advances in ergonomics in design, usability & special populations: part III. AHFE International; 2014 [citado em 23 jun. 2025]. Disponível em: https://openaccess.cms-conferences.org/publications/book/978-1-4951-2108-1/article/978-1-4951-2108-1_49.
Brasil. Lei nº 13.146, de 06 de julho de 2015: institui a Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência (Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência). 2023 [citado em 23 jun. 2025]. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2015/Lei/L13146.htm.
Sund T, Iwarsson S, Anttila H, Helle T, Brandt Å. Test-retest reliability and agreement of the Satisfaction with the Assistive Technology Services (SATS) instrument in two Nordic countries. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014 [citado em 23 jun. 2025];30(5):367-74. pmid: 24410414/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Renata Conter Franco, Haidar Tafner Curi, Eliana Chaves Ferretti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
