Ergonomics and usability in Assistive Technology design: scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v35i1-3e230519Keywords:
Assistive Technology, Ergonomics, Design, UsabilityAbstract
Assistive Technology (AT) is essential for promoting independence, autonomy, and quality of life, especially for older adults and individuals with chronic illnesses or disabilities. However, the successful use of these devices depends on their ability to address the personal and contextual dimensions of those who rely on them. Although studies on AT development, effectiveness, and usability exist, there is still a gap in the literature regarding the synthesis of information linking these factors to the design of such products. Objective: To explain the procedures and criteria that will guide the literature mapping and subsequent analyses involving the application of ergonomics and usability principles in the design of assistive technology. Method: This protocol describes a scoping review outlined with the JBI and PRISMA-ScR model guidelines, focusing on the exploration of evidence and aiming to ensure the rigor and replicability of the study. The review question was constructed using the acronym Population, Concept and Context. Original studies published in peer-reviewed journals that address the relationship between AT Ergonomics and/or Usability will be included, with no date or language restrictions.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Policy brief: Access to assistive technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332222/9789240005044-eng. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y2
Brasil. Lei no 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015. Diário Oficial da União. 2015 Jul 6. https://www.gov.br/planalto/pt-br://www. planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13146.htm3.
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Global Report on Assistive Technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2022. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400494514.
Phillips H, Renda G, McDonald R. Design and assistive technology: a tinder match waiting to happen. Design Science. 2024;10:e5. doi: 10.1017/dsj.2024.2
Rodrigues ADL, Martinez LBA, Silveira ZC. An iterative design procedure for the development of assistive devices based on a participatory approach. J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. & Eng. 2024;46(3). doi: 10.1007/s40430-024-04695-3
Scherer MJ, Federici S. Why people use and don’t use technologies: introduction to the special issue on assistive technologies for cognition/cognitive support technologies. Scherer MJ, Federici S, editors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):315-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-151264
Harris N. The design and development of Assistive Technology. IEEE Potentials. 2017;36(1):24-8. doi: 10.1109/MPOT.2016.2615107
Carneiro L, Rebelo F, Filgueiras E, Noriega P. Usability and User Experience of Technical Aids for People with Disabilities? A Preliminary Study with a Wheelchair. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;3:6068-74. doi: 10.1016/j. promfg.2015.07.736
Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts (ISO 9241-11:2018). 2018.
International Ergonomics Association. What is ergonomics (HFE)? [Internet]. 2023. Disponível em: https://iea.cc/about/what-is-ergonomics/#:~:text=The%20definition%20of%20 ergonomics%20(or,optimize%20human%20well%2Dbeing%20
European Committee for Standardization. Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts (ISO 9241-11:2018). 2018.
World Health Organization. Global report on assistive technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2022. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451
Ravneberg B. Usability and abandonment of assistive technology. J Assist Technol. 2012;6(4):259-69. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/17549451211285753
Cook, AM, Polgar, JM, Encarnação, P. Assistive Technologies: principles and practice. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2019.
Holtkamp FC, Wouters EJM, Verkerk MJ. Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(3). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030318
Päivinen M, Heinimaa T. The usability and ergonomics of axes. Appl. Ergon. 2009;40(4):790-96. doi: 10.1016/j. apergo.2008.08.002
Sonderegger A, Sauer J. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl. Ergon. 2010;41(3):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j. apergo.2009.09.002
Horton EL, Renganathan R, Toth BN, Cohen AJ, Bajcsy AV, Bateman A, et al. A review of principles in design and usability testing of tactile technology for individuals with visual impairments. Assistive Technology. 2016;29(1):28-36. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1176083
Prémont MÉ, Vincent C, Mostafavi MA, Routhier F. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;15(2):119-31. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1539876
Nishiura Y, Nihei M, Nakamura-Thomas H, Inoue T. Effectiveness of using assistive technology for time orientation and memory, in older adults with or without dementia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;16(5):1-7. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1650299
Prajapati G, Sharmila K. Difficulties experienced by older adults when not using assistive devices. Discov Soc Sci Health. 2023;3(1). doi: 10.1007/s44155-023-00037-1
Lim DYL, Lai HS, Yeow RCH. A bidirectional fabric-based soft robotic glove for hand function assistance in patients with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01250-4
Hansen TC, Tully TN, Mathews VJ, Warren DJ. A Multimodal Assistive-Robotic-Arm Control System to Increase Independence After Tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:2124-33.doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.340883324.
Kermavnar T, Shannon A, O’Sullivan LW. The application of additive manufacturing / 3D printing in ergonomic aspects of product design: A systematic review. App Ergon. 2021;97:103528. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103528
Turkistani T, Qurban W. The effect of using three dimensional (3D)-printed assistive devices for clients with physical disabilities to increase self-independency in daily activities. J Public Health. 2020;30:849-53. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01362-4
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris. E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z (Eds.). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. North Adelaide: JBI; 2024.27.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(45):1-10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Larissa Leite Umbelino, Carolina Maria do Carmo Alonso, Talita Silvério de Souza Silva, Larissa Boanerges Freire, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
