The Wanderings of the Cogito in the young Tolstoy: freedom and asceticism of the will (1847-1852)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2024.225370

Keywords:

Young Tolstoy, Philosophy, Will, Wandering

Abstract

The article analyzes the philosophical fragments of the young Tolstoy from the 1840s on the basis of the philosophical effects of idealism in Russian modernity. Taking as its fil rouge the sense of rootlessness caused by Peter's autocratic gesture, which is responsible for the advent of a modernity deprived of the "hereditary habits" (Nietzsche) and the "traditional ties " (Tchaadaiév) necessary for the development of an intramundane ethic, the article interprets the philosophy of the young Tolstoy in the light of the indeterminacy of the will in Descartes and Kant. The main argument is that the concept of “unlimited will”, as presented by the young Tolstoy, should be read as the non-dialectical phenomenon of a chronotype indifferent to the Hegelian thesis that “the truth of space is time”. As a kind of extension of Tchaadaiév's skepticism, the article suggests that the young Tolstoy's philosophy of freedom should be read in the light of what Derrida called the hyperbolic wanderings of the cogito, the extravagance of an unlimited will devoid of ontology - the young Tolstoy's excess toward infinity and indeterminacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jimmy Sudario Cabral, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

    Professor no Departamento e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Religião da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Coordenador do Núcleo de Estudos da Religião em Dostoiévski e Tolstói – Nerdt. htps://www.ufjf.br/nerdt/; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-0554; sudarioc@hotmail.com

References

AUERBACH, E. Mimesis. A representação da realidade a literatura ocidental. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1971.

AUGUSTO PINTO, P. A. “Borodinó”, de Mikhail Iúrevitch. Slovo – Revista de Estudos em Eslavística, v. 3, n. 3, 2021.

BATAILLE, G. La littérature et le mal. Paris: Gallimard, 1957

BENSUSAN, G. L’Ecriture de l’Involontaire: Philosophie de Proust. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2020.

BENSUSSAN, G. Morale et Passion, Rio de Janeiro: Mauad, 2024 (a ser publicado)

BENSUSSAN, G. Miroirs dans la nuit: Lumières de Hegel. Paris: Les Editions du Cerf, 2022. (Coleção Passages).

BENSUSSAN, G. La philosophie est un nihilisme. Revista De Literaturas E Teologias, 13(31), 17–35.

CABRAL, J. S. Tolstói e a escritura do niilismo. Teoliterária - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias, v. 13, n. 31, p. 54–72, 2023.

CARRAUD, V. Pascal et la philosophie. Paris: PUF, 2007.

COSTA, I. La contradiction et la limite: Sur la démonologie poétique de M. Y. Lermontov. RUS Revista de Literatura e Cultura Russa, v. 12, n. 18, 2021.

DERRIDA, J. L'Écriture et la différence. Par Jacques Derrida. Paris, Édition du Seuil, 1967.

DOSTOÏEVSKI, F. Les Carnets du sous‐sol, (traduction André Markowicz) Arles, Acte Sud, Babel, 1993.

DOSTOIÉVSKI, F. “Записки из подполья”. Полное собрание сочинений, Тom 5. Повести и рассказы. Наука. Ленингр. отд-ние, 1973.

DOSTOIÉVSKI, F. L’idiot, Actes Sud (traduction d’André Markowicz), 1983.

DOSTOIÉVSKI, F. Púchkin. In: GOMIDE, B. B. (org.). Antologia do Pensamento Crítico Russo. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2013.

EIKHENBAUM, B. Молодой Толстой. Петербург—Берлин: Изд. З. И. Гржебина, 1922

GOMIDE, B. B. (org.). Antologia do Pensamento Crítico Russo. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2013.

ГОРЬКИЙ, М. Лев Толстой, 1952. http://feb-web.ru/feb/tolstoy/critics/trk/trk-4462.htm?cmd=p

GRIGORIEV, A. Tolstoy’s negation and praise for the “submissive” type of personality. In: KNOWLES, A. V. Tolstoy: The Critical Heritage. Boston: Redwood Burn, 1978. p. 69–72.

GUSTAFSON, R. Leo Tolstoy: Resident and Stranger. A study in fiction and theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. p. 224–225.

IVANOV, V. Dostoïevski: Tragédie Mythe Religion. Paris: Editions des Syrtes, 2000.

KANT, I. Crítica da Razão Prática. Trad. Artur Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1989.

LEVINAS, E. Da Existência ao Existente. Campinas: Papirus, 1998.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, fondateur des sciences de l'homme, 1962. http://www.espace-rousseau.ch/f/textes/levi-strauss1962.pdf.

MARION, J. L. Cours sur la volonté. Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. 2002.

MARION, J. L. Sur le prisme métaphysique de Descartes: Constitution et limites de l’onto-théo-logie dans la pensée cartésienne. Paris: PUF, 2004.

MARION, J. L. Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes: Analogies, création des vérités éternelles et fondement. Paris: PUF, 2009.

NIETZSCHE, F. Considérations inactuelles I et II. Paris: Gallimard, 1990.

ORWIN, D. Tolstoy’s art and thought, 1847–1880. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

ORWIN, D. Consequences of Consciousness: Turgenev, Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2007.

ORWIN, D. The Return to Nature: Tolstoyan Echoes in The Idiot. The Russian Review, v. 58, n. 1, p. 87–102, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2679707. Acesso em: 15 maio. 2024.

TOLSTOI, Lev. Полное собрание сочинений (Obras Completas Reunidas), Том 1. Москва: Государственное издательство, 1935.

TOLSTOI, Lev. Полное собрание сочинений (Obras Completas Reunidas), Том 2. Москва: Государственное издательство, 1935.

TOLSTOI, Lev. Полное собрание сочинений (Obras Completas Reunidas), Том 46. Москва: Государственное издательство, 1937.

TOLSTOI, Lev. “Письма 1873–1879” (Cartas 1873–1879) Полное собрание сочинений (Obras Completas Reunidas). Том 62. Москва: Государственное издательство, 1953.

Lettres I. 1828-1879. Gallimard, 1978.

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Cabral, J. S. (2024). The Wanderings of the Cogito in the young Tolstoy: freedom and asceticism of the will (1847-1852). RUS (Sao Paulo), 15(26), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2024.225370