"Art as Device" - 100 years later
In memory of Svetlana Boym
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2018.149992Keywords:
Chklóvsli, Russian Formalism, OstranênieAbstract
In 2017, It was celebrated the centenary of publication of “Art as device”, the essay in wich Viktor Chklóvski presents the first version of his celebred concept of “ostranênie”. Due to this, this study was thought as a comemorative perspective. It is discusses same relevant aspects presented in Chklóvski’s essay, as well as analyze, albeit briefly, some of its developments in Western critical tradition.
Downloads
References
AMBROGIO, Ignazio. Formalismo y vanguardia em Rusia. Roma: Editori Riuniti, 1968.
BERLINA, Alexandra. (edit. e trad.). Viktor Shklóvski: a reader. New York: Bloomsburry, 2017.
BERNARDINI, Aurora. “Formalismo russo: uma revisitação”. In: Literatura e Sociedade 5. Revista do DTLLC-FFLCH-USP, 2002.
BOYM, Svetlana. “Poetics and Politics of estrangement: Victor Shklovsky and Hannah Arendt” In: BOYM, Svetlana (ed.). Poetics today: estrangement revisited I, 26 (4). Durham (NC): Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 581-614.
BRADFORD, Richard. Roman Jakobson – Life, language, art. London: Routledge, 1994.
CHKLÓVSKI, Victor. Sobre a teoria da prosa (о теории прозы). São Petersburgo, 1983.
CHKLÓVSKI, Victor. “A arte como procedimento”. In: TOLEDO, Dionísio de Oliveira (org.). Teoria da Literatura: Formalistas Russos (3ª ed.). Porto Alegre: Editora Globo, 1976, pp. 39-56.
CHKLÓVSKI, Victor. “Art as device”. In: BERLINA, Alexandra. (edit. e trad.). Viktor Shklóvski: a reader. New York: Bloomsburry, 2017, pp. 73-95.
CHKLÓVSKI, Victor. Bowstring: on the dissimilarity of the similar. Londres: Dalkey Archive, 2011.
DANTO, Arthur. After the end of art: Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
DURÃO, Fábio. Akcelrud. Teoria (literária) americana: uma introdução crítica. Campinas: Autores Associados, 2011.
EAGLETON, Terry. After theory. New York: Penguin, 2003.
ERLICH, Victor. Russian formalism: History - Doctrine. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton 1965.
ERLICH, Victor. Child of a Turbulent Century (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2006), p. 132.
FERRARA, Lucrácia D’Aléssio. A estratégia dos signos. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2ª ed. 1ª reimpressão, 2009.
FUKUYAMA, Francis. The end of History and the last mane. New York: Free Press, 1992.
HANSEN-LÖVE, Aage. Der russische Formalismus: methodologischerekonstruktion seiner entwicklungausdemprinzip der verfremdung. Viena, 1978.
IVÁNOV, Viatchesláv V. Dos diários de Serguei Eisenstein e outros ensaios. São Paulo: Edusp. 2009.
JAKOBSON, Roman. “Novíssima poesia russa”. In: Dissertação de Mestrado de Sonia Regina Martins Gonçalves. Roman Jakobson e a geração que esbanjou seus poetas. USP. 2001.
JAMESON, Frederic. The Prison-House of language: a critical account of structuralism and russian formalism. Princeton: Princeton University press. 1972.
KALININ, Ilya. “Viktor Shklovsky vs. Roman Jakobson. Poetic Language or Poetic Function of Language.” Revista Enthymema, n. 19, 2017. (link: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/enthymema/article/view/9427/8901.)
NEPEVNI, Vladimir. Victor Chklóvski e Roman Jakobson: a vida como romance (Viktor Chklovski i Roman Iakobson. Jizn kak roman). Documentário, 2009.
OLIVEIRA, Franklin. Viola d’amore. Rio de Janeiro: Edições do Val, 1965.
POMORSKA, Krystyna. Russian Formalists theory and its Poetic Ambience.The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 1968.
RONEN, Omri. “Audiatur et altera pars. O pritchinakh razryva Romana Iakobsona s viktorom Chklovskim". In: Novoie Literaturnoie Obozreniie. [Audiatur et altera pars: causas do conflito entre Roman Jakobson e Viktor Chklóvski.]. Revista Nova Revisão Literária, 23 (1997), pp. 164-168.
SANMARTÍN ORTÍ, Pau. Otra historia del formalismo ruso. Madrid: Lengua de trapo, 2008.
SCHNAIDERMAN, Boris. “Informalmente, o ‘Formalismo’”.Folha de São Paulo (Folhetim), Domingo, 17 de junho de 1984 (nº 387), pp.3-6.
SCHNAIDERMAN, Boris. “Prefácio”. In: TOLEDO, Dionísio de Oliveira (org.). Teoria da Literatura: Formalistas Russos (3ª ed.). Porto Alegre: Editora Globo, 1976.
SANTAELLA, Lucia; NÖTH, Winfried. Imagem: cognição, semiótica, mídia. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1997.
SHELDON, Benjamin. Shklovsky: literary theory and practice, 1914-1930. Ann Arbor (Michigan), 1966.
SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakrovorti. Death of a discipline. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005)
STEINER, Peter. Russian Formalism: a metapoetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.
THOMPSON, Ewa M. Russian formalism and Anglo-american New Criticism: a comparative study. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.
TIHANOV, Galin. “The politics of Estrangement: The case of the Early Shklovsky”. In: BOYM, Svetlana (ed.). Poetics today: estrangement revisited I, 26 (4). Durham (NC): Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 665-696.
TIHANOV, Galin. “Why did modern literary theory originate in Central and Eastern Europe? (and why is it now dead?). Common Knowledge, nº 10, 2004.
TOMPSON, Ewa M. Russian Formalism and Anglo-American New Criticism. The Hague-Paris: Mouton, 1971.
VITALE, Serena. Shklovsky – wittness to an era: interviews by Serena Vitale. London: Dalkey Archieve Press, 2012.
ŽIŽIEK, Slavoj. How to read Laca. Londres (UK): Granta Books, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Valteir Vaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in RUS agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
