Irony and seriousness in the Russian novel

notes to read Dostoevsky from Kierkegaard's point of view

Authors

  • Jimmy Sudario Cabral Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2020.169009

Keywords:

Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Irony, Romanticism, Nihilism

Abstract

The article considers that Kierkegaard's analyzes of romantic irony carry a critical and explanatory potential capable of shedding light on the philosophical and aesthetic significance of Dostoevsky's romanesque works. Considering the judgment of Bakhtin, who recognized in Dostoevsky's polyphonic Novel an expression of overcoming the philosophical solipsism of romanticism, the article proposes that the kierkegaardian concept of “dominated irony”, present in the last part of his dissertation on The concept of irony, can be used as a key to the interpretation of Dostoevsky's aesthetics, as well as his diagnosis and attempt to overcome the aesthetic nihilism of romantics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAKHTIN, M. Notas sobre literatura, cultura e ciências humanas. Organização, tradução, posfácio e notas: Paulo Bezerra; notas da edição russa: Serguei Botcharov. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2017.

BENSUSSAN, G. Como Dostoiévski narraria uma vida. In: II SEMINÁRIO DO NÚCLEO DE ESTUDOS DA RELIGIÃO EM DOSTOIÉVSKI E TOLSTÓI, Juiz de Fora, 24 e 25 de outubro de 2019.

BIANCHI. F. Os últimos dos moicanos. In: TURGUÊNIEV, I. Rúdin. Tradução, posfácio e notas: Fátima Bianchi. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2014.

DERRIDA, J. L'écriture et la différence. Collection “Tel Quel”. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1967.

DOSTOIÉVSKI, F. Memórias do subsolo. Tradução, prefácio e notas: Boris Schnaiderman. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2000.

FANGER, D. Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism. A study of Dostoevsky in relation to Balzac, Dickens, and Gogol, Evanston: Nothwestern University Press, 1998.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Cursos de estética, v. 1. São Paulo: Edusp, 2001.

HEIDEGGER, M. Nietzsche I. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2007.

JACKSON, R. L. Dialogues with Dostoevsky: The Overwhelming Questions. California: Stanford University Press, 1992.

KELLY, A. Toward Another Shore. Russian Thinkers Between Necessity and Chance, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.

KIERKEGAARD, S. O conceito de ironia. Constantemente referido a Sócrates. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1991.

KLEINERT, M. Jean Paul: Apparent and Hidden Relations between Kierkegaard and Jean Paul. In: Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries. Tome III: Literature and Aesthetics. Ed. Jon Stewart. Ashgate, 2008.

LUKÁCS, G. Selected Correspondence (1902-1920). Editado por Judith Markus e Zaltan Tar. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

LUKÁCS, G. A teoria do Romance. Um ensaio histórico-filosófico sobre as formas da grande épica. São Paulo: Duas Cidades/Editora 34, 2000.

LUKÁCS, G. Posfácio. In: Os anos de aprendizado de Wilhelm Meister. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2009.

LÖWY, M. O jovem Lukács e Dostoiévski. In: Numen: revista de estudos e pesquisa da religião, Juiz de Fora, v. 19, n. 1, p. 36-54, 2016.

ORWIN, D. Consequences of Consciousness. Turgenev, Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy. California: Stanford University Press, 2007.

PRATT, S. Russian MetaphisicalMetaphysical Romanticism. The poetry of Tiuchev and Boratynskii. Stanford University Press, 1984.

STACY, R. Russian literary criticism, a short history. Syracuse University Press, 1974.

SUDÁRIO-CABRAL, J. The Gospel of Chernyshevsky: Nihilism, Art, and Religious Asceticism. Dostoevsky and World Culture. Philological journal. Moscow: A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature Russian Academy of Science, v. 2, p. 242-269, 2019.

SCHMID, U. Heidegger and Dostoevsky: Philosophy and Politics. Dostoevsky Studies, New Series, v. XV (2011), p. 37-45.

TURGENEV, I. The Essential Turgenev. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1994.

TURGUÊNIEV, I. Rúdin, Tradução, posfácio e notas: Fátima Bianchi. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2014.

VOLPI, F. O niilismo. São Paulo: Ed. Loyola, 1999.

Published

2020-06-08

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Cabral, J. S. (2020). Irony and seriousness in the Russian novel: notes to read Dostoevsky from Kierkegaard’s point of view. RUS (Sao Paulo), 11(15), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2020.169009