Copula constructions in russian: when to use and when not to use the eto particle?

когда использовать, а когда не использовать частицу это?

Authors

  • Diego Leite Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2019.151905

Keywords:

Copula constructions, Russian, Eto

Abstract

In this paper copula sentences in Russian and the variation in their use are analyzed. In some cases, the pronominal particle eto is used, what some scholars characterize as exclusive for equative sentences, in other cases, the copula relation is expressed by the simple juxtaposition of phrases in a string, what is generally considered as a property of attributive sentences. This research focuses on the linguistic knowledge of native speakers of Russian an seeks to identify which contexts allow the use of particle éto. Thus, an experiment called acceptability judgment was developed in which Russian native speakers living in the city of Moscow evaluated copulative sentences with and without the element éto. Preliminary results show that the use of strategies adopted by native speakers to mark copula display gradient behavior. However, despite the fact that éto does not behave categorically, the systematization of its contexts of use is still possible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AARTS, B. Syntactic gradience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

ARUTIUNOVA, N. D. Priedlojenie i iego smysl. Logiko-semantitcheskie probliemy. Moskva: Nauka, 1976.

CURNOW, T. “Towards a Cross-linguistic Typology of Copula Construction”. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2003.

CUBBERLEY, P. Russian: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

DIESSEL, H. Usage-based construction grammar. In: Ewa Dabrowska and Dagmar

Divjak (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2015.

GEIST, L. Predication and Equation In Copular Sentences: Russian Vs. English. In: Illeana Comorovski and Klaus von Heusinger (eds.) Existence: Semantics and Syntax. Amsterdam: Springer, 2007, p. 79-105.

HALLIDAY, M. K. A. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 2014.

HENGEVELD, K. Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.

LEITE DE OLIVEIRA, Diego. Construções de foco com o marcador éto em russo. Rio de Janeiro: 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

LEITE DE OLIVEIRA, D. Multifuncionalidade da palavra eto: implicações para o ensino de russo para estrangeiros. Rus, vol. II, 2013.

PADUCHEVA, E.; USPIENSKII, V. A. Podliejacheie ili skazuiemoie? (semantitcheskii kritierii razlitchienia podliejachiego i skazuiemogo d binominativnykh priedlojeniakh). Izv. NA, NA SSSR, T. 38, Nº 4, 1979.

PADUCHEVA, E. Znatchienie i sintaksitchekie funktsii slova eto. Probliemy strukturnoi lingvistiki 1980. Moskva: Nauka, 1982.

PARTEE, B. specificational copular sentencesin russian and english. In: Grønn, A. & Marijanovic , I. (eds.) Russian in Contrast, Oslo Studies in Language 2(1), 2010. 25–49

VINOGRADOV, V. Russki iazyk. Moskva: UPEDGIZ, 1947.

Published

2019-06-12

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Leite, D. (2019). Copula constructions in russian: when to use and when not to use the eto particle? когда использовать, а когда не использовать частицу это?. RUS (Sao Paulo), 10(13), 86-112. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.2019.151905