Between two Barges: comments about the regime of visuality and the discourses on the history of art.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2178-0447.ars.2017.125972Keywords:
Robert Rauschenberg, Théodore Géricault, flatbed, mesa de montagem, Georges Didi-HubermanAbstract
From the contrast between Robert Rauschenberg’s Barge and Théodore Géricault’s Le Radeau de la Méduse, this article discusses the context in which they were introduced, the development of their critical reception and their mixing with different historiographical meanings, taking into account the need for setting up critical returns and conceptual dislocations. By evoking authors that propose interpretative models approaching contemporary art, this article contributes to the hypothesis that argues for a homology between different forms of discourse, being the plastic and the theoretical ones under the logic of montage table. This article received a grant from CNPq.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The responsibility for obtaining written permission to use in the articles materials protected by copyright law lies entirely with the author(s). Ars is not responsible for copyright breaches made by its collaborators.
The authors have the copyrights and grant the journal the right of the first publication, with the article licensed under the Creative Commons BY-CC License.
Licensees have the right to copy, distribute, display, and carry out the work and make derivative works from it, including with commercial purposes, granted that they give the due credit to the author or licensor, as specified by them.
Licensees compromise to inform the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Respected the terms of the license, the licensors/authors are not allowed to revoke the conditions above mentioned.
After the publication of the articles, the authors keep the copyrights and the rights to republish the text exclusively in unpublished books and collections.
