Challenges in estimating the encapsulation efficiency of proteins in polymersomes - Which is the best method?

Authors

  • Carlota de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui Department of Biochemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4221-9505
  • Gisele Monteiro Department of Biochemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Grace Ruiz-Lara Department of Biochemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Jorge Javier Muso-Cachumba Department of Biochemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Keywords:

Encapsulation efficiency, Biomolecules encapsulation, Poloxamer, Vesicle disruption, Polymersomes

Abstract

Polymersomes are nanometric vesicles that can encapsulate large and hydrophilic biomolecules, such as proteins, in the aqueous core. Data in literature show large variation in encapsulation efficiency (%EE) values depending on the method used for calculation. We investigated different approaches (direct and indirect) to quantify the %EE of different proteins (catalase, bovine serum albumin-BSA, L-asparaginase and lysozyme) in Pluronic L-121 polymersomes. Direct methods allow quantification of the actual payload of the polymersomes and indirect methods are based on the quantification of the remaining non-encapsulated protein. The protein-loaded polymersomes produced presented approximately 152 nm of diameter (PDI ~ 0.4). Higher %EE values were obtained with the indirect method (up to 25%), attributed to partial entanglement of free protein in the polymersomes poly(Ethylene Glycol) corona. For the direct methods, vesicles were disrupted with chloroform or proteins precipitated with solvents. Reasonable agreement was found between the two protocols, with values up to 8%, 6%, 17.6% and 0.9% for catalase, BSA, L-asparaginase and lysozyme, respectively. We believe direct determination is the best alternative to quantify the %EE and the combination of both protocols would make results more reliable. Finally, no clear correlation was observed between protein size and encapsulation efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alanezi AA, Neau SH, D’mello AP. Development and Application of a Modified Method to Determine the Encapsulation Efficiency of Proteins in Polymer Matrices. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020 Oct;21(7):1-8.

Amini Y, Amel Jamehdar S, Sadri K, Zare S, Musavi D, Tafaghodi M. Different methods to determine the encapsulation efficiency of protein in PLGA nanoparticles. Biomed Mater Eng. 2017;28(6):613-20.

Apolinário A, Magoń M, Pessoa Jr. A, Rangel-Yagui C. Challenges for the Self-Assembly of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)- Poly(Lactic Acid) (PEG-PLA) into Polymersomes: Beyond the Theoretical Paradigms. Nanomaterials [Internet]. 2018 May 26 [cited 2020 Jul 4];8(6):373. Available from: Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/6/373

» http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/8/6/373

Apolinário AC, Ferraro RB, de Oliveira CA, Pessoa A, de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui C. Quality-by-Design Approach for Biological API Encapsulation into Polymersomes Using “Off-the-Shelf” Materials: a Study on L-Asparaginase. AAPS PharmSciTech . 2019;20(6):1-12.

Asakura T, Adachi K, Schwartz E. Stabilizing effect of various organic solvents on protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1978 Sep 25;253(18):6423-5.

Blackman LD, Varlas S, Arno MC, Houston ZH, Fletcher NL, Thurecht KJ, et al. Confinement of Therapeutic Enzymes in Selectively Permeable Polymer Vesicles by Polymerization- Induced Self-Assembly (PISA) Reduces Antibody Binding and Proteolytic Susceptibility. ACS Cent Sci [Internet]. 2018 Jun 27 [cited 2023 Mar 22];4(6):718-23. Available from: Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00168

» https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00168

Chatin B, Mével M, Devallière J, Dallet L, Haudebourg T, Peuziat P, et al. Liposome-based Formulation for Intracellular Delivery of Functional Proteins. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015 Jun 23;4:e244.

Dimov N, Kastner E, Hussain M, Perrie Y, Szita N. Formation and purification of tailored liposomes for drug delivery using a module-based micro continuous-flow system. Scientific Reports 2017;7:1 [Internet]. 2017 Sep 21 [cited 2023 Mar 30];7(1):1-13. Available from: Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-11533-1

» https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-11533-1

Farzin A, Beheshtizadeh N, Vaez A, Siminzar P, Varzandeh M, Azami M. Encapsulation: Controlled drug delivery. Principles of Biomaterials Encapsulation: Volume 2. 2023 Jan 1;2:149-200.

Gao X, Wang M. Nanoparticles for intracellular protein delivery. Encyclopedia of Nanomaterials. 2023 Jan 1;590-603.

Goyal AS, Salvador C, Mathe C, Candeias A, Caldeira AT. Optimization of protein extraction and ELISA immunodetection from protein-based paint models with mesoporous silica nanoparticles and MCM41. The European Physical Journal Plus 2021 136:6 [Internet]. 2021 Jun 25 [cited 2023 Mar 15];136(6):1-16. Available from: Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01628-0

» https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01628-0

Hussain MT, Forbes N, Perrie Y. Comparative Analysis of Protein Quantification Methods for the Rapid Determination of Protein Loading in Liposomal Formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2019 Jan 1;11(1).

Kansız S, Elçin YM. Advanced liposome and polymersome- based drug delivery systems: Considerations for physicochemical properties, targeting strategies and stimuli- sensitive approaches. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023 Jul 1;317:102930.

Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2020 20:2. 2020 Dec 4;20(2):101-24.

Oliveira CA, Forster C, Léo P, Rangel-Yagui C. Development of triblock polymersomes for catalase delivery based on quality by design environment. J Dispers Sci Technol [Internet]. 2020;0(0):1-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1080/01932691.2020.1823232

» https://doi.org/10. 1080/01932691.2020.1823232

Pachioni-Vasconcelos J de A, Apolinário AC, Lopes AM, Pessoa A, Barbosa LRS, Rangel-Yagui C de O. Compartmentalization of therapeutic proteins into semi-crystalline PEG-PCL polymersomes. https://doi.org/101080/1539445X20201812643 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 2];19(2):222-30. Available from: Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1539445X.2020.1812643

» https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1539445X.2020.1812643

Price WS, Tsuchiya F, Arata Y. Lysozyme Aggregation and Solution Properties Studied Using PGSE NMR Diffusion Measurements. J Am Chem Soc. 1999 Dec 15;121(49):11503-12.

de Souza Guimarães M, Cachumba JJM, Bueno CZ, Torres-Obreque KM, Lara GVR, Monteiro G, et al. Peg- Grafted Liposomes for L-Asparaginase Encapsulation. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2022 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Mar 22];14(9):1819. Available from: Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1999- 4923/14/9/1819/htm

» https://www.mdpi.com/1999- 4923/14/9/1819/htm

Stetefeld J, McKenna SA, Patel TR. Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences. Biophys Rev [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1 [cited 2023 May 31];8(4):409-27. Available from: Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/28510011/

» https://pubmed.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/28510011/

Tan C, Hosseini SF, Jafari SM. Cubosomes and Hexosomes as Novel Nanocarriers for Bioactive Compounds. J Agric Food Chem [Internet]. 2022 Feb 9 [cited 2023 Aug 22];70(5):1423-37. Available from: Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06747

» https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06747

Wang L, Chierico L, Little D, Patikarnmonthon N, Yang Z, Azzouz M, et al. Encapsulation of biomacromolecules within polymersomes by electroporation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl [Internet]. 2012 Oct 29 [cited 2023 Mar 26];51(44):11122-5. Available from: Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23023772/

» https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23023772/

Wlodarczyk SR, Costa-Silva TA, Pessoa-Jr A, Madeira P, Monteiro G. Effect of osmolytes on the activity of anti-cancer enzyme L-Asparaginase II from Erwinia chrysanthemi. Process Biochemistry. 2019 Jun 1;81:123-31.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-03

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Challenges in estimating the encapsulation efficiency of proteins in polymersomes - Which is the best method?. (2023). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 59. https://doi.org/10.1590/