Labour-values through a succession of redefinitions: an analysis of the "new solutions" to the "transformation problem"

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614836glf

Keywords:

Transformation problem, New Solution, Labour-values, Value theory, Production prices

Abstract

Until 1980, the ‘transformation problem’ used to be seen as an overcome issue in the classical theory of value. However, since 1980, ‘new solutions’ have been published – the “New Interpretation”, “Temporal Single System”, “Radical Reconceptualization” and the “Macro-monetary interpretation”. Our contribution here is to present and evaluate them using a simple analytical scheme, without linear algebra. We also present the sraffian interpretation of Marx’s theory of value, which has solid textual basis and allows us to understand why there are so many “new solutions” for a problem that didn’t exist. We conclude that, from an interpretative point of view, the new contributions are problematic and, from an analytical point of view, they don’t provide an original contribution to the literature. In the appendices, we present the same concepts using linear algebra and a proof of convergence of the “temporal” price system to the “simultaneist” production prices system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Gustavo Daou Lucas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia

    Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia

  • Franklin Serrano, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia

    Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia

References

Abraham-Frois, Gilbert, Berrebi, Edmond. 1984. “Le probleme de la transformation: solutions(s).” Econometrica 52: 1315

Baumol, William. 1974. “The Transformation of Values: What Marx ‘Really’ Meant (An Interpretation).” Journal of Economic Literature 12: 51-62

Bortkiewicz, Ladislau von. 1949. “On the Correction of Marx’s Fundamental Theoretical Construction in the ‘Third Volume of Capital.” In Karl Marx and the Close of His System, editado por P. M. Sweezy, 199-221. New York: Kelley, 1949. Publicado originalmente como “Zur Berichtigung der grundlegenden theoretischen Konstruktion von Marxism 3. Band des ‘Kapital’,” Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik 34 (1907): 319-35.

Campbell, Al. 1997. “The transformation problem: A simple presentation of the “new solution.” Review of Radical Political Economics 29: 59–69.

Dmitriev, Vladimir. 1898. The theory of value of David Ricardo; reprinted in Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility, edited by Domenico Mario Nuti. 1974. Cambridge University Press: 37-95

Dumenil, Gerard.1983. “Beyond the Transformation Riddle: A Labor Theory of Value.” Science and Society, XLVII: 427-450

Foley, Duncan; Duménil, Gérard. 2008. “Marxian transformation problem.” In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. Palgrave Macmillan. Acessado em 22/01/2017.

dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_M000400> doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1052

Freeman, Alan. 1996. “Price, value and profit – a continuous, general treatment”. In: Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics, edited by Alan Freeman & Guglielmo Carchedi Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 225-279

Foley, Duncan. 1982. “The value of money, the value of labor power, and the Marxian transformation problem.” Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 37-49

Foley, Duncan. 2000. “Recent developments in the labor theory of value.” Review of Radical Political Economics 32: 1-39

Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1984. “Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx.” Oxford Economic Papers 36: 291-325

Garegnani, Pierangelo, Petri, Fabio. 1989. “Marxismo e Teoria Economica Hoje”, in História do Marxismo 12, editado por E. Hobsbawn, Paz & Terra.

Garegnani, Pierangelo. 2002. “Sraffa’s price equations: Stationary economy or normal positions?” In Is there really progress in economics? Edited by S. Boehm, C. Gehrke, H. D. Kurz, R. Sturm Cheltenham, Elgar.

Hunt, E.K, Glick, Mark. 1987. “Transformation Problem” In: The New Palgrave, Volume 4 First Edition, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman, London Macmillan: 688-690

Kliman, Andrew; McGlone, Ted. 1999. “A temporal single-system interpretation of Marx’s value theory.” Review of Political Economy, 11: 33-59.

Lipietz, Alain. 1982. “The so-called ‘transformation problem’ revisited.” Journal of Economic Theory 26: 59-88.

Marx, Karl. 1894. “Capital: critique of political economy”. Volume III. International Publishers, N.Y. www.marxists.org

Mcglone, Ted, Kliman, Andrew. 1996. “One system or two? The transformation of values into prices of production versus the transformation problem.” In: Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics, edited by Alan Freeman & Guglielmo Carchedi Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 225-279

Mongiovi, Gary. 2002. “Vulgar economy in Marxian garb: a critique of Temporal Single System Marxism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 34: 393-416.

Morishima, Michio, Catephores, George. 1980. “Valor, exploração e crescimento. Zahar”.

Moseley, Fred. 2000. “The “New Solution” to the Transformation Problem: a Sympathetic Critique.” Review of Radical Political Economics 2: 282-316.

Moseley, Fred. 2015. “Money and Totality: a Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the ‘Transformation Problem’”. Brill.

Okishio, Nobuo. 1963. “A mathematical note on Marxian theorems.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 91: 287-299.

Petri, Fabio. 2014. “On some modern reformulations of the labour theory of value.” Contributions to Political Economy 34: 77-104

Ravagnani, Fabio. 2005. “A Critical Note on Moseley’s ‘Macro-Monetary’ Interpretation of Marx’s Theory.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 37: 85-96.

Screpanti, Ernesto. 2005. “Guglielmo Carchedi´s art of fudging explained to the people.” Review of Political Economy 17: 115-126

Shaikh, Anwar. 1982. “Neo-ricardian economics: wealth of algebra, poverty of theory.” Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 67-83

Shibata, Kei. 1933. “The Meaning of the Theory of Value in Theoretical Economics.” Kyoto University Economic Review VIII: 49–68

Sinha, Ajit. 2003. “The Transformation Problem A Critique of the ‘New Solution’.” Review of Radical Political Economics 29: 51-58.

Sraffa, Piero. 1960. “Production of commodities by means of commodities”. Cambridge University Press. 1960

Sweezy, Paul. 1942. “Theory of capitalist development”. Monthly Review Press.

Steedman, Ian. 1977. “Marx after Sraffa”, New Left Books, London.

Vianello, Fernando. 1987. “Labour Theory of Value” In: The New Palgrave, Volume 3 First Edition, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman, London Macmillan: 107-113

Wolff, Richard, Roberts, Bruce, Callari, Antonino. 1982. “Marx’s (Not Ricardo’s) ‘Transformation Problem’: A Radical Reconceptualization.” History of Political Economy 14: 564-582

Published

30-09-2018

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lucas, G. D., & Serrano, F. (2018). Labour-values through a succession of redefinitions: an analysis of the "new solutions" to the "transformation problem". Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 48(3), 525-554. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614836glf