Academic inbreeding: insights about research in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41615041tpmf

Keywords:

Academic inbreeding, Postgraduate, Mobility, Logit hurdle

Abstract

This article analyzes the academic inbreeding in Brazilian public universities, defined as a recruitment practice in which universities hire their own doctoral students upon completion of their studies. In this sense, we used data from professors working in research groups and the number of publications in international and national journals, as well as the number of doctoral students oriented as proxies for scientific research and the activities of teaching and research. By applying a negative binomial hurdle model, no-inbreds publish at least one international article, more national articles, and have less doctoral students under their supervision. However, it is not possible to state categorically that no-inbreds are more productive, since different scientific areas have different disciplinary cultures, and the academic market jobs is going through a transitional phase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alipova, O. e Lovakov, A. 2018. “Academic inbreeding and publication activities of Russian faculty”. Tertiary Education and Management 24, no.1: 66-82.

Altbach, P.G., Yudkevich, M. e Rumbley, L.E. 2015. “Academic inbreeding: local challenge, global problem”. Asia Pacific Education Review 16, no.3: 317-330.

Amorim Neto, O. e Santos, F. 2015. “La ciencia política en Brasil en la última década: la nacionalización y la lenta superación del parroquialismo”. Revista de Ciencia Política 35, no.1: 19-31.

Balbachevsky, E. 2005. “A pós-graduação no Brasil: novos desafios para uma política bem-sucedida". In: Brock, C. e Schwartzman, S. (Orgs.) Os desafios da educação no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2005.

Barata, G. 2015. “Em revisão: o impacto da produção científica brasileira para o Brasil”. Ciência e Cultura 67, no.4: 6-8.

Barbosa, E.T., Lunardi, M.A., Bizatto, L.S. e Biavatti, V.T. 2018. “Relação entre Endogenia e a Avaliação CAPES dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Contábeis no Brasil”. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade 12, no.2 :169-185.

Bazzan, A.L., e Argenta, V.F. 2011. “Network of collaboration among PC members of Brazilian computer science conferences”. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 17 no.2: 133-139.

Berelson, B. 1960. Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Birnbaum, R. 2005. “Professor and Sensei: the construction of faculty roles in the United States and Japan”. Higher Education Forum 2 :71-92.

Braga, M.M.S. e Venturini, A.E.J.F. 2013. “Endogenia acadêmica em um programa de pós-graduação em direito”. In: Mezzaroba, O., Tavares Neto, J.Q. e Vasconcelos, S.A. (Coords.). Direito, educação, ensino e metodologia jurídicos. Florianópolis: FUNJAB.

Brasil. 2010. Ministério da Educação. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Plano Nacional de Pós-Graduação (PNPG) 2011-2020. Brasília: CAPES.

Brasil. 2001. Ministério da Educação. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. A necessidade de desenvolvimento da pós-graduação profissionalizante e o ajustamento do Sistema de Avaliação às características desse segmento. Brasília: CAPES.

Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment”. Regional studies 39, no.1: 61-74.

Cameron, A.C. e Trivedi, P.K. 2010. Microeconometrics using Stata: Revised Edition. Stata Press.

Cameron, A.C. e Trivedi, P.K. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cardoso, M.S. 2011. A formação do mercado de trabalho acadêmico no Brasil - 1990 a 2009. 2011. 214 f. Tese (Doutorado em sociologia) - Universidade de Brasília.

Cardoso S., Rosa M.J., e Stensaker, B. 2016. “Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics”. Assess Evaluation on Higher Education 41:950–965.

Cirani, C.B.S., Campanario, M. de A. e Silva, H.H.M. da. 2015. “A evolução do ensino da pós-graduação senso estrito no Brasil: análise exploratória e proposições para pesquisa”. Avaliação-Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior 20, no.1: 163-187.

Clark, S.A. e Larson, R.F. 1972. “Mobility, Productivity, and Inbreeding at Small Colleges: A Comparative Study”. Sociology of Education 45, no.4: 426-434.

Cole, J.R. e Cole, S. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. Censo do Diretório de Grupos de Pesquisa (2016-2014). Disponível em: <http://lattes.cnpq.br/web/dgp/censos2>. Acesso em: 15 set. 2019.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Dados Abertos. Disponível em: <https://dadosabertos.capes.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 08 nov. 2019.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Portaria nº 81, de 3 de junho de 2016. Define as categorias de docentes que compõem os Programas de PósGraduação (PPG’s) stricto sensu. 2016. Disponível em< https://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/legislacao/06062016-PORTARIA-N-8-De-3-DE-JUNHO-DE-2016.pdf>: Acesso em: 11 out. 2019.

Coutinho, R.X., Dávila, E.S., Santos, W.M., Rocha, J.B., Souza, D.O., Folmer, V., e Puntel, R.L. 2012. Brazilian scientific production in science education. Scientometrics 92, no.3: 697-710.

Crane, D. 1965. “Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition”. American Sociological Review, 699-714.

Cruz-Castro, L. e Sanz-Menéndez, L. 2010. “Mobility versus job stability: Assessing tenure and productivity outcomes”. Research Policy 39, no.1: 27-38.

Cummings, W. K. 1975. “Understanding Behavior in Japan's Academic Marketplace”. The Journal of Asian Studies 34, no.2: 313-340.

Dillon, N. 2003. “The postdoctoral system under the spotlight: A European Union Directive regulating fixed-term contracts has focused attention on scientific career structures and could have long-term effects on European science”. EMBO Reports 4, no.1: 2-4.

Durieux, V., e Gevenois, P.A. 2010. “Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements Of Scientific Publication”. Radiology 255, no.2: 342-351.

Dutton, J.E. 1980. The impact of inbreeding and immobility on the professional role and scholarly performance of academic scientists. In: The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

Eelss, W.C. e Cleveland, A.C. 1935. “Faculty inbreeding”. The Journal of Higher Education 6, no.5: 261–269.

Eisenberg, T. e Wells, M.T. 2000. “Inbreeding in law school hiring: Assessing the performance of faculty hired from within”. The Journal of Legal Studies 29, no.1: 369-388.

Faria, J.R., Araujo Júnior, A. F., e Shikida, C.D. 2007. “The Citation Pattern of Brazilian Economists”. Estudos Econômicos 37, no.1: 151-166.

Faria, J.R. e Mixon, F.G. 2020. “The Peter and Dilbert Principles applied to academe”. Economics of Governance 21: 115-132.

Faria, J.R., Wanke, P.F., Ferreira, J.J., e Mixon, F.G. 2018. “Research and innovation in higher education: empirical evidence from research and patenting in Brazil”. Scientometrics 116, no.1: 487-504.

Faria, L.I.L., Gregolin, J.A.R. e Hoffmann, W.A.M. 2010. “Análise da produção científica a partir de publicações em periódicos especializados”. In: FAPESP (Ed.). Indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em São Paulo 2010. São Paulo: FAPESP.

Fox, M.F. 2005. “Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists”. Social Studies of Science 35, no.1: 131-150.

Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., e Hoekman, J. 2009. “Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program”. Journal of informetrics 3, no.3: 222-232.

Godechot, O. e Louvet, A. 2010. Academic Inbreeding: An Evaluation. Disponível em: <https://booksandideas.net/Academic-Inbreeding-An-Evaluation.html>. Acesso em: 07 set. 2019.

Gorelova, O. e Lovakov, A. 2016. “Academic inbreeding and research productivity of Russian faculty members”. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, n. wpbrp32/edu.

Gorelova, O. e Yudkevich, M. 2015. “Academic inbreeding: State of the literature”. In: Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P.G. e Rumbley, L.E. (Eds.), Academic inbreeding and mobility in higher education: Global perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Haddad, E.A., Mena-Chalco, J.P., e Sidone, O. 2017. “Produção científica e redes de colaboração dos docentes vinculados aos programas de pós-graduação em Economia no Brasil”. Estudos Econômicos 47, no.4: 617-679.

Hargens, L.L. e Farr, G.M. 1973. “An examination of recent hypotheses about institutional inbreeding”. American Journal of Sociology 78, no.6: 1381-1402.

Hilbe, J.M. 2011. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.

Hirsch, J.E. 2005. “An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output”. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 102, no.46: 16569-16572.

Hollingshead, A.B. 1938. “Ingroup membership and academic selection”. American Sociological Review 3, no.6: 826-833.

Horta, H. 2013. “Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research”. Higher Education 65, no.4: 487-510.

Horta, H., Sato, M., Yonezawa, A. 2011. “Academic inbreeding: Exploring its characteristics and rationale in Japanese universities using a qualitative perspective”. Asia Pacific Education Review 12, no.1: 35-44.

Horta, H., Veloso, F. e Grediaga, R. 2010. “Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity”. Management Science 56, no.3: 414–429.

Horta, H. e Yudkevich, M. 2016. “The role of academic inbreeding in developing higher education systems: Challenges and possible solutions”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 113: 363-372.

Horta, J.S.B. e Moraes, M.C.M. de. 2005. “O sistema CAPES de avaliação da pós-graduação: da área de educação à grande área de ciências humanas”. Revista Brasileira de Educação 30, no.4: 95-116.

Hostins, R.C.L. 2006. “Os Planos Nacionais de Pós-Graduação (PNPG) e suas repercussões na Pós-graduação brasileira”. Perspectiva 24, no.1: 133-160.

Inanc, O. e Tuncer, O. 2011. “The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness”. Scientometrics 88, no.3: 885-898.

Kimura, E.T. 2010. “O dilema das revistas científicas brasileiras na divulgação da produção científica nacional”. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia 54, no.1: 1-2.

Kyvik, S. 2003. “Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000”. Scientometrics 58, no.1: 35-48.

Laender, A.H., Lucena, C.J., Maldonado, J.C., Silva, E.S., e Ziviani, N. 2008. “Assessing the research and education quality of the top Brazilian Computer Science graduate programs”. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 40, no.2: 135-145.

Lafferty, H.M. 1964. “Of time and the teachers colleges in Texas”. Peabody Journal of Education 42, no.1: 14-22.

Loeys, T., Moerkerke, B., Smet, O. de e Buysse, A. 2012. “The analysis of zero‐inflated count data: Beyond zero‐inflated Poisson regression”. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 65, no.1: 163-180.

Madeira, R.M. e Marenco, A. 2016. “The challenges of internationalization: mapping dynamics and paths of international flow”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política 19: 47-74.

Martins, C.B.A. 2009. “Reforma universitária de 1968 e a abertura para o ensino superior privado no Brasil”. Educação & sociedade 30, no.106: 15-35.

Mcgee, R. 1960. “The function of institutional inbreeding”. The American Journal of Sociology, 65, no.5: 483–488.

Mcneely, J.H. 1932. Faculty inbreeding in land-grant Colleges and Universities. Washington: Office of Education.

Mena‐Chalco, J.P., Digiampietri, L.A., Lopes, F.M., e Cesar, R.M. 2014. "Brazilian bibliometric coauthorship networks”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65, no.7: 1424-1445.

Mingers, J., e Leydesdorff, L. 2015. “A review of theory and practice in scientometrics”. European journal of operational research 246, no.1: 1-19.

Nalimov, V.V., e Mulʹchenko, Z.M. 1971. Measurement of science. Study of the development of science as an information process. Washington: Foreign Technology Division.

Nielsen, M.W. 2016. “Gender inequality and research performance: moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement”. Studies in Higher Education 41, no.11: 2044-2060.

Pan, S. 1993. A study of faculty inbreeding at eleven land-grant universities. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.

Ponds, R., Oort, F.V., e Frenken, K. 2009. “Innovation, spillovers and university–industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach”. Journal of Economic Geography 10, no.2: 231-255.

Ravenscroft, J., Liakata, M., Clare, A., e Duma, D. 2017. “Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements”. PloS one 12, no.3: 1-23.

Reeves, F.W., Henry, N.B., Kelly, F.J., Klein, A.J. e Russel, J.D. 1933. The university faculty. Chicago: The University of Chicago.

Rocca, F.X. 2007. “In Spain, Inbreeding Threatens Academe”. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, no.22: 1-317.

Royal Society. 2011. Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: The Royal Society. Disponível em: <https://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/knowledge-networks-nations/report/>. Acesso em: 06 jul. 2020.

Sahu, S.R., e Panda, K.C. 2014. “Does the multi-authorship trend influence the quality of an article?” Scientometrics 98, no.3: 2161-2168.

Shen, H., Xu, Z. e Zhang, B. 2015. Faculty Inbreeding in China: Status, Causes and Results.In: Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P.G., e Rumbley, L.E. (Eds.), Academic inbreeding and mobility in higher education: Global perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Shimbori, M. 1981. “The Japanese academic profession”. Higher Education 10, no.1: 75-87.

Sidone, O.J.G., Haddad, E.A., e Mena‐Chalco, J.P. 2017. “Scholarly publication and collaboration in Brazil: The role of geography”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, no.1: 243-258.

Sidone, O.J.G., Haddad, E.A., e Mena-Chalco, J.P. 2016. “A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração científica”. Transinformação 28, no.1: 15-32.

Silva, D.M., Carvalho, T.O., Amaro, B., e Assis, T.B. 2016. “O retrato situacional das revistas científicas brasileiras”. Cadernos BAD 2: 116-124.

Sistema de Informações Georreferenciadas (GEOCAPES). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Disponível em: < https://geocapes.capes.gov.br/geocapes/>. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2019.

Sivak, E. e Yudkevich, M. 2015. “Academic immobility and inbreeding in Russian University sector”. In: Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P.G. e Rumbley, L.E. (Eds.), Academic inbreeding and mobility in higher education: Global perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sivak, E. e Yudkevich, M. 2009. “Academic Inbreeding: Pro and Contra”. Educational Studies, 1: 170-187.

Smyth, R. e Mishra, V. 2014. “Academic inbreeding and research productivity and impact in Australian law schools”. Scientometrics 98, no.1: 583-618.

Souza, C.D. de; Filippo, D. de e Casado, E.S. 2018. “Crescimento da atividade científica nas universidades federais brasileiras”. Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior 23, no.1: 126-156.

Stephan, P. e M.A., J. 2005. “The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctorate career stage”. American Economic Review 95, no.2: 71-75.

Tavares, O., Cardoso, S., Carvalho, T., Sousa, S.B. e Santiago, R. 2015. “Academic inbreeding in the Portuguese academia”. Higher Education 69, no.6: 991-1006.

Tavares, O., Lança, V. e Amaral, A. 2017. “Academic Inbreeding in Portugal: Does Insularity Play a Role?” Higher Education Policy 30, no.3: 381–399.

Tavares, O., Sin, C. e Lança, V. 2019. “Inbreeding and Research Productivity Among Sociology PhD Holders in Portugal”. Minerva 57: 373–390.

Trzesniak, P. 2016. “Um Qualis em quatro tempos: Histórico e sugestões para administração, ciências contábeis e turismo”. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 27, no.72: 279-290.

Velho, L. e Krige, J. 1984. “Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists”. Social Studies of Science 14, no.1: 45–62.

Vives, J., Losilla, J.M. e Rodrigo, M.F. 2006. “Count data in psychological applied research”. Psychological Reports 98, no.3: 821-835.

Wang, M., Wang, Z., e Chen, G. 2019. “Which can better predict the future success of articles? Bibliometric indices or alternative metrics”. Scientometrics 119, no.3: 1575-1595.

Web of Science Group. A Pesquisa no Brasil: Promovendo a excelência. 2019. Disponível em: <https://propp.ufms.br/files/2019/09/Pesquisa-no-Brasil.pdf>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2019.

Wilson, L. 1942. The Academic Man. New York: Oxford University.

Wu, J. 2019. “Infrastructure of Scientometrics: The Big and Network Picture”. Journal of Data and Information Science 4, no.4: 1-12.

Wyer, J.C. e Conrad, C.F. 1984. “Institutional inbreeding re-examined”. American Educational Research Journal 21, no.1: 213-225.

Yamanoi, A. 2005. “The academic marketplace in Japan: Inbreeding, grades and organization at research universities”. Higher Education 3, no.1: 93–114.

Yudkevich, M. 2014. “The Russian University: recovery and rehabilitation”. Studies in Higher Education 39, no 8:1463-1474.

Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P.G. e Rumbley, L.E. 2015. Academic inbreeding and mobility in higher education: Global perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Zorzetto, R., Razzouk, D., Dubugras, M.T.B., Gerolin, J., Schor, N., Guimarães, J.A. e Mari, J.J. 2006. “The scientific production in health and biological sciences of the top 20 Brazilian universities”. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 39, no.12: 1513–1520.

Published

09-12-2020

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pelegrini, T., & França, M. T. A. (2020). Academic inbreeding: insights about research in Brazil. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 50(4), 573-610. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41615041tpmf