Como os economistas discordam: um ensaio metodológico sobre o "contexto da descoberta" em economia

Authors

  • Marco Antonio Ribas Cavalieri Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612007000200006

Keywords:

history of economic thought, methodology, context of discovery

Abstract

This article concerns the methodology of investigations about the history of economic thought from a plural perspective, considering the variety of approaches as the strongest feature in the knowledge of economic phenomena. Here it is presented a suggestive methodology to study the birth of schools of thought, what we call the "context of discovery" in economics. We argue about the relations between the social reality, which is historically and geographically specific, and the theories and new approaches that appear in these contexts. The methodology suggested ranges from the schools of thought characterization, by the means of Kuhn and Lakatos categories, to the treatment of anachronism, which is embedded in all intellectual historiography work. As a result, an interpretative model is designed, to be used in future studies about authors and schools of economic thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alencar, E. Introdução à lógica matemática. São Paulo: Makron Books, 1992.

Backhouse, R. Explorations in economic methodology: from Lakatos to empirical philosophy

of science. London: Routledge, 1998.

Barnes, B. Scientific knowledge and sociological theory. London: Routledge & Kegan

Paul, 1974.

Blaug, M. Metodologia da economia: ou como os economistas explicam. São Paulo:

EDUSP, 1993.

Blaug, M. No history of ideas, please, we’re economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives,

v. 15, n. 1, 2001.

Bloor, D. Science and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.

Caldwell, B. Beyond positivism: economic methodology in the nineteenth century. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1982.

Coats, A. W. Is there a “structure of scientific revolutions” in economics? Kyklos, v. 22, 1969.

De Marchi, N. Introduction. In: De Marchi, N., Post-Popperian methodology of economics:

recovering pratice. Boston: Kluwer, 1992.

Dobb, M. Theories of value and distribution since Adam Smith: ideology and economic

theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

Dow, S. The methodology of macroeconomic thought: a conceptual analysis of schools of

thought in economics. 2a Edição. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.

Earp, F. S. Um pouco além de Thomas Kuhn. Revista de Economia Política, v. 16, n. 1 (61), 1996.

Febvre, L. El problema de la incredulidad em siglo XVI: la religión de Rabelais. México: Uteha, 1959.

Feyerabend, P. K. Against method. 1a Edição. New York: Verso Books, 1993.

Foucault, M. As palavras e as coisas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1981.

Hands, W. Reflection without rules: economic methodology and contemporary science

theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Heilbroner, R.; Milberg, W. The crisis of vision in modern economic thought. New York:

Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Holton, G. A imaginação científica. (trad. port.). Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1979.

Holton, G. Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Eistein. Ed. rev. London: Harvard University Press, 1988.

Keynes, J. M. A teoria geral do emprego, do juro e da moeda. São Paulo: Atlas, 1982.

Knorr-Cetina, K. The manufacture of knowledge. New York: 1981.

Kuhn, T. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 8a Edição. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2003.

Kuhn, T. Reflections on my critics. In: Lakatos, I.; Musgrave, A., Criticism and the

growth of knowledge: proceedings of international colloquium in philosophy of

science. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970a.

Kuhn, T. Second thoughts on paradigms. In: Suppes, P. (ed.), The structure of scietific theories. Urbana: 1970b.

Lakatos, I. Falsification and the methodology on scientific research programmes.

In: Lakatos, I.; Musgrave, A. Criticism and the growth of knowledge: proceedings

of international colloquium in philosophy of science. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Lakatos, I. A história da ciência e suas reconstruções racionais. São Paulo: Edições 70, 1999.

Latsis, S. J. Method and appraisal in economics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

Lawson, T. Reorienting economics. London: Routledge, 2003.

Loasby, B. J. Public science and public knowledge. Research in the History of Economic

Thought and Methodology, v. 4, 1986.

Mäki, U. Social conditioning of economics. In: De Marchi, N., Post-Popperian methodology

of economics: recovering pratice. Boston: Kluwer, 1992.

Mastermann, M. The nature of a paradigm. In: Lakatos, I.; Musgrave, A., Criticism

and the growth of knowledge: proceedings of international colloquium in philosophy

of science. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Myrdal, G. Value in social theory: a selection of essays on methodology. London:

Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.

Paula, J. A. et al. Nações e estilos de economia política. Textos para Discussão, n. 160.

Cedeplar/UFMG, 2001.

Paula, J. A. Walras no Journal des Économistes: 1860-65. Revista Brasileira de Economia,

v. 56, n. 1, 2002.

Peacock, M. Explaining theory choice: an assessment of the critical realist contribution

to explanation in science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, v. 30,

n. 3, 2000.

Peacock, M. No methodology without ontology! Reorienting economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, v. 11, n. 3, 2004.

Peters, F. E. Termos filosóficos gregos. (trad. port.). 2a Edição. Lisboa: Fundação C. Gulbekian, 1983.

Popper, K. R. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper Torch Books, 1968.

Robinson, J. Filosofia económica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1964.

Schumpeter, J. A. História da análise econômica. vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura, 1964.

Shapin, S. History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of Science, v. 20, 1982.

Stengers, I. A invenção das ciências modernas. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2002.

Viera, J. G. S.; Fernandez, R. G. A estrutura das revoluções científicas na economia e a

revolução Keynesiana. 2004. Mimeografado.

Viskovatoff, A. Rationalism and mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Methodology,

v. 10, n. 3, 2003.

Whitley, R. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 1984.

Published

01-06-2007

Issue

Section

Não definida

How to Cite

Cavalieri, M. A. R. (2007). Como os economistas discordam: um ensaio metodológico sobre o "contexto da descoberta" em economia . Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 37(2), 373-403. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612007000200006