Consequências metodológicas das formulações 'as if': como a abordagem evolucionária sugere uma interpretação realista da economia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612009000200001Keywords:
methodology, as if, instrumentalism, and realismAbstract
This paper aims to challenge the widespread view that economists' usage of as if formulations implies an instrumentalist (i.e. anti-realist) methodological perspective. Based on an account of the role played by as if propositions in scientific theorizing, it argues that they are also compatible with a realist posture. To undertake the foregoing task, it scrutinizes what as if formulations amount to and goes on to identify some realist and instrumentalist uses of them in the actual practice of economics and evolutionary biology. More fundamentally, the present work puts forth the idea that as if might receive a realist interpretation if it consists of a simplified counterpart of an explanation that explicitly describes evolutionary processes that bring about patterns of behavior in the real economic world.Downloads
References
ALCHIAN, A. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. In: ALCHIAN, A. Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1977.
Archibald, G. H. S.; Samuelson, P. Problems of methodology: discussion.
American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, v. 53, n. 2, p. 227-236, May 1963.
BARBIERI, F. A Teoria de processo de mercado na escola austríaca moderna. 2004. Dissertação
(Mestrado em Economia) – Faculdade de Economia e Administração, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2004.
BARBIERI, F. História do debate do cálculo econômico socialista. 2004. Tese (Doutorado em
Economia) – Faculdade de Economia e Administração, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2004.
BARTLEY III, W. W.; RADNITZKY, G. (Ed.). Evolutionary epistemology, rationality and the sociology of science. La Salle: Open Court, 1987.
BARTLEY III, W. W. Unfathomed knowledge, unmeasured wealth: on universities and the wealth of nations. La Salle: Open Court, 1990.
BECKER, G. S. Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
BOLAND, L. A critique of Friedman´s critics, Journal of Economic Literature, v. 17, 1979.
CAMPBELL. D. T. Evolutionary epistemology. In: BARTLEY III, W.W.; Radnitzky,
G. (Ed.). Evolutionary epistemology, rationality and the sociology of science. La Salle: Open Court, 1987.
DAWKINS, R. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
DAWKINS, R. The blind watchmaker. New York: Norton, 1996.
DAWKINS, R. A escalada do monte improvável. São Paulo: Cia. das Letras, 1998.
FRIEDMAN, M. The metodology of positive economics. In: Essays in positive economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953.
GARRISON, R. Time and money: the macroeconomics of capital structure. London: Routledge, 2000.
HANDS, D. W. Did Milton Friedman’s methodology license the formalist revolution? Journal of Economic Methodology, 10, p. 507-520, 2003.
HAYEK, F. A. Individualism and Economic O rder. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
HAUSMAN, D. M. The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1992.
HIRSCH, A.; DeMarch i, N. Milton Friedman economics in theory and practice. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.
Hodgson, G. M. Evolution and institutions: on evolutionary economics and the evolution
of economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.
HOOVER, K.D Milton Friedman’s stance: the methodology of causal realism. Duke University Working Paper Series, 2004.
KIRZNER, I. Competição e atividade empresarial. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Liberal, 1986.
KNIGHT, F. H. Risco, incerteza e lucro. Rio de Janeiro: Expresão e Cultura, 1972.
KRINK, T.; VOLLRATH, F. Analysing Spider Web-building with rule-based simulations and genetic algorithms. Journal of Theoretical Biology, n. 185, p. 321-331, 1997.
LACHMANN, L. Expectations and the meaning of institutions. London: Routledge, 1994.
LANGLOIS, R. The market process: an evolutionary view. In: BOETTKE, P.; PRYCHITKO,
D. (Ed.). The market process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1994.
MÄKI, U. Rhetoric at the expense of coherence: a reinterpretation of Milton Friedman’s
methodology. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 4, p. 127-143, 1986.
MÄKI, U. Scientific realism and Austrian explanation. Review of Political Economy, 2.3,
p. 310-44, 1990.
MÄKI, U. On the method of isolation in economics. In: Dilworth , C. (Ed.).
Poznam Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, special issue, 26, p. 319-354, 1992a.
MÄKI, U. Friedman and realism. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 10, p. 171-195, 1992b.
MÄKI, U. Isolation, idealization and truth in economics. In: Hamminga, B.; De
March i, N. (Eds.). Poznam Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, special issue, 38, p. 147-168, 1993a.
MÄKI, U. The market as an isolated causal process: a metaphysical ground for realism.
In: Caldwell, B.; Boehm, S. (Ed.). Austrian Economics: tensions and new developments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers, 1993b.
MÄKI, U. Reorienting the assumptions issue. In: Bac khouse, R. (Ed.). New directions
in economic nethodology. London: Routledge, 1994.
MÄKI, U. Scientific realism and some peculiarities of economics. Boston Studies in the
Philosophy of Science, 169, p.425-445, 1996.
MÄKI, U. As if. In: DAVIS, J.; HANDS, W.; MÄKI, U. Handbook of Economic Methodology.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998a.
MÄKI, U. Realism. In: DAVIS, J.; HANDS, W.; MÄKI, U. Handbook of Economic
Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998b.
MÄKI, U. Kinds of assumptions and their truth: shaking an untwisted F-twist. Kyklos, 53, p. 303-322, 2000.
MÄKI, U. The methodology of positive economics (1953) does not give us a methodology
of positive economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 10, 4, p. 495-505, 2003.
MAYER, t. Friedman’s methodology of positive economics: a soft reader. Economic Inquiry, 31, p. 213-223, 1993.
MURAMATSU, R. Sobre a possibilidade do altruísmo: uma incursão pela análise econômica
do comportamento não-egoísta. 1999. Tese (Mestrado em Economia) – Faculdade de Economia e Administração, Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, 1999.
NELSON, R., Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, p. 48-90, 1995.
NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1982.
NORTH, D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
POPPER, K.R. Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
RIDLEY, M. Evolution. Cambridge: Blackwell Science, 1996.
SCHACKLE, G.L.S. Epistemica y economia. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1976.
SOBER, E.; WILSON, D. S. Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish
behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
VROMEN, J. J. Economic evolution: an inquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics. London: Routledge, 1995.
VROMEN, J. J. Taking evolution seriously: what difference does it make to economics? In:
Dav is, J. B; Marc iano, A.; J. Runde, J. (Ed.). The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy. Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Roberta Muramatsu, Fábio Barbieri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.
