Os efeitos dos choques reais e nominais sobre as taxas de câmbio no Brasil

Authors

  • Emerson Marinho Universidade Federal do Ceará. Curso de Pós-Graduação em Economia
  • Marcelo Teixeira Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Escola de Pós-Graduação em Economia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612010000300002

Keywords:

exchange rates, nominal and real shocks, permanent and temporary effects

Abstract

This article analyses the impact of real and nominal shocks on the real and nominal exchange rates between Brazil and the US in the period from1999 to 2007. The main objective is to verify the real and nominal exchange rates paths toward the long-run equilibrium, and how these rates can be decomposed into movements caused by real and nominal shocks. The results show that both types of exchange rates respond immediately to a nominal shock leading to overshooting. However, the effect of a nominal shock, on the real exchange rate is only temporary, while, on the nominal exchange rate, it is permanent. Subjected to a real shock both exchange rates jump to a level that overshoots their long run equilibrium, returning to it around 25 months. The real shock also has a permanent effect on the real and the nominal exchange rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABRAS, A. L. G.; SEKKEL, R. M. Choques nominais e reais na taxa de câmbio: evidência

empírica para o Brasil pós desvalorização de 1999. Disponível em:

www.anpec.org.br/encontro2003/artigos/c48.pdf>. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2007.

BLANCHARD, O.; QUAH, D. The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review, v. 79, p. 655-673, Sep. 1989.

CLARIDA, R.; GALÍ, J. Sources of real exchange rate fluctuations: how important

are nominal shocks? Carnegie - Rochester Series on Public Policy, v. 41, p. 1-54, 1994.

CHOI, C. Y.; MARK, N. C.; SUL, D. Unbiased estimation of the half-life to PPP

convergence in panel data. Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, v. 38, p. 921-38, June 2006.

DORNBUSCH, Rudiger. Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, v. 84, p. 1161-76, Dec. 1976.

ENDERS, W.; LEE, B. Accouting for real and nominal exchange rate movements in the pos-Breton Woods period. Journal International Money and Finance, v.16, p. 233-54, 1997.

ENGLE, R. F.; GRANGER, C. W. J. Cointegration and error-correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, p. 251-76, Mar. 1987.

GALLAGHER, L. A.; KAVANAGH, E. Real and nominal shocks to exchange rate: does the regime matter? The Manchester School, 70, 2002.

JOHANSEN, S.; JUSELIUS, K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration – with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, p. 169–210, 1990.

LANNE, M.; LÜTKEPOHL, H.; SAIKKONEN, P. Comparison of unit root tests for time series with level shifts. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 2002.

MACKINNON, J. G. Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, p. 601-618, 1996.

MACKINNON, J. G.; HAUG, A. A.; MICHELIS, L. Numerical distribution functions of likelihood

ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, p. 563-577, 1999.

MAIA, S. F.; RAMALHO, H. M. de B. Efeitos reais e nominais sobre as flutuações da taxa real de câmbio Brasil/Estados Unidos: um estudo empírico usando VAR (1999-2003). Revista Economia, v. 7, n. 1, p. 59-100, jan./jul. 2006.

ROGOFF, K. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, p. 647-668, 1996.

ROSSI, B. Confindence Intervals for Half-Life Deviations from PPP. Duke Economics Working Paper # 02-08, 2001.

TURNOVSKY, S. J. Methods of macroeconomic dynamics. MIT Press, 1997.

Published

30-09-2010

Issue

Section

Não definida

How to Cite

Marinho, E., & Teixeira, M. (2010). Os efeitos dos choques reais e nominais sobre as taxas de câmbio no Brasil. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 40(3), 535-559. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612010000300002