Flypaper effect revisited: evidence for tax collection efficiency in Brazilian municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612011000200002Keywords:
flypaper effect, efficiency, tax collectionAbstract
The purpose of this article is to propose a reinterpretation of the traditional flypaper effect according to which central government transfers to local governments increase public spending by more than do increases in private income. Here, higher transfers from the federal government might induce less efficiency in local tax collection opposed to the income effect. Initially, we build a model in order to point out the possible existence of that flypaper effect in a context of standard maximization on the part of local governments. Next, we construct efficiency scores for Brazilian municipalities using Free Disposable Hull (FDH), taking into consideration two outputs: amount of per capita local tax collected -tax revenue- and the size of local informal economy - tax base. Last, using two stages least squares and Tobit regressions, which the instruments is built upon the rules established in the 1988 Brazilian Constitution and where we find that unconditional transfer funds to municipalities, we estimate that transfers have the opposite effect (negative) of consumer's income on efficiency of taxation, which leads us to a reinterpretation of the flypaper effect.
Downloads
References
Alfirman, L. 2003. Estimating stochastic frontier tax potential: can Indonesian local governments increase tax revenues under decentralization? Working Paper 03-19. University of Colorado at Boulder.
Bailey. S.; Connolly, S. 1998. The flypaper effect: identifying areas for further research. Public Choice, 95: 335-361.
Bajada, C. 2002. How reliable are estimates of the underground economy? Economics Bulletin, vol. 3, no. 14, p. 1-11.
Baron, D.P.; Ferejohn, J.A. 1987. Bargaining and agenda formation in legislatures. The American Economic Review, 77(2):303-309.
Baron, D.P.; Ferejohn, J.A.1989. Bargaining in legislatures. American Political Science Review, 83 (4):1181-1206.
Barros, C. P. 2007. Technical and allocative efficiency of tax offices: a case study, J. Public Sector Performance Management, 1, p. 41-60.
Becker, E.1996. The illusion of fiscal illusion: Unsticking the flypaper effect. Public Choice, 86: 85-102.
Becker, G. 1983. A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, August: 371-400.
Blundell, R.; Duncan, A.; Megh ir, C.1998. Estimating labor supply responses using tax reforms, Econometrica, p. 243-249.
Brueckner, J. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of theoretical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26, 175-188.
Courant, P. N.; Gramlich E. M.; Rub infield, D. 1979. The stimulative effects of intergovernmental grants, or Why Money sticks where it hits. In Fiscal federalism and grants-in-aid, Mieszkowski and Oakland (eds.), Washington Urban Institute.
Eichengreen, B.; von Hagen, J. 1996. Fiscal federalism and monetary union - is there a trade of between federalism and budgetary restrictions, NBER Working Paper 5517, Cambridge: Massachusetts.
Filimon, R.; Romer, T.; Rosenth al, H. 1982. Asymmetric information and agenda control. Journal of Public Economics, February: 51-70.
Førsund, F.R; Kitt elsen, S.; Lindseth , F. 2005. Efficiency and productivity of Norwegian tax offices, Memorandum 29/2005, University of Oslo, Department of Economics.
Giles, D.E.; Caragata, P.J. 1998. The learning path of the hidden economy: tax and growth effects in New Zealand. Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
Gordon, N.2004. Do federal grants boost school spending? Evidence from Title I, Journal of Public Economics 88(9-10): 1771-92.
Greene, W.H.1981. On the asymptotic bias of the ordinary least squares estimator of the Tobit model, Econometrica, 49, 505-513.
Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Fifth Edition.
Grossman, P.J. 1994. A political theory of intergovernmental grants. Public Choice, 78: 295-303.
Gupt a, S.; Verhoeven, M. 2001. The efficiency of government expenditures experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23, 433-467.
Hausman, J.; Poterba, P. 1987. Household behavior and the tax reform act of 1986, Journal of Economic Perspectives, p. 101-119.
Hamilton, J. H.1986. The flypaper effect and the deadweight loss from taxation. Journal of Urban Economics 19: 148-155.
Hines, J. R.; Thaler, R.H.1995. Anomalies: the flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 217-26.
IMF. 2003. Government Finance Statistics Yearbook.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais, (http://www.ibge.gov.br).
IPEA . Instituto de Pesquisa e Economia Aplicada, Ministério do Planejamento.
(http://www.ipeadata.gov.br).
Kath araki, M.; Tsakas, M. 2010. Assessing the efficiency and managing the performance of Greek tax offices. Journal of Advances in Management Research, vol. 7, issue 1, p. 58-75.
Knight , B. 2002. Endogenous federal grants and crowd-out of state government spending: theory and evidence from the Federal Highway Program. American Economic Review, vol. 92, 71-92.
Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Peltzman, S. 1976. Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, August: 211-48.
Pereira, P.T.C. 1996. A politico-economic approach to intergovernmental lump-sum grants. Public Choice, 88: 185-201.
Ribeiro, E. P. 1998. Transferências intergovernamentais e esforço fiscal dos estados brasileiros. Anais do XXI Encontro Brasileiro de Econometria.
Romer, T.; Rosenth al, H.1980. An institutional theory of the effect of intergovernmental grants. National Tax Journal, December: 451-58.
Romer, T.; Rosenth al, H. 1982. Median voter or budget maximizers: evidence from school expenditure referenda. Economic Inquiry, October: 556-78.
Shah, A.1994. The reform of intergovernmental fiscal relations in developing and emerging market economies. Washington: World Bank.
Simar, L. 2003. Detecting outliers in frontier models: a simple approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 391–424.
Simar, L.; Wilson, P.W. 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production process. Journal of Econometrics, vol. 136(1), p. 31-64.
Sousa, M. da C. S.; Cribari-Neto, F.; St osic, B. 2005. Explaining DEA technical efficiency scores in an outlier corrected environment: the case of public service in Brazilian municipalities. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, number 2, p. 289-315.
Sousa, M. da C.S.; Araújo, P.; Tannuri-Pianto, M.E. 2009. Residual and technical tax efficiency scores for Brazilian municipalities: a two-stage approach, Anais do XXXI Encontro Brasileiro de Econometria.
Thirtle, C., B.; Sh ankar, P.; Ch itk ara, S.; Ch att erjee; Mohanty . 2000. Size does Matter: technical and scale efficiency in Indian state jurisdictions. Review of Development Economics, 4, 340-352.
Veiga, L.G.; Pinho, M.M. 2007. The political economy of intergovernmental grants: evidence from maturing democracy. Public Choice, published on line, August.
Wilson, P.1993. Detecting influential observations in deterministic non-parametric frontiers models with multiple outputs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(3), p. 319-323.
Wilson, P.W. 1995. Detecting influential observations in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6(1), p. 27-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 nlinson Mattos, Fabiana Rocha, Paulo Arvate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.
Atualizado em 14/08/2025