Abstract
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612014000200003Keywords:
Technological innovation, Sectoral patterns, Manufacturing industry, PINTECAbstract
This paper investigates sectoral patterns of innovation in the Brazilian manufacturing
industry under the Neo-Schumpeterian Evolutionary approach. The database used is the
Brazilian Survey of Technological Innovation (PINTEC) for 2006-2008. Two hypotheses
guide the paper. The first suggests that the competitive reality shapes the competitive
strategy of firms and, consequently, their routine search pattern. The second assumes
that there is a convergence between the innovative behavior of the domestic industry
and the taxonomy proposed by Keith Pavitt. The results support the two hypotheses.
However, the paper also points out that sectors that combine low-tech and high share
of exports in revenue have low adherence to their respective Pavittians types
Downloads
References
ALVES, Rozane. O setor confecções de vestuário e acessórios: estratégias competitivas. XLVI Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural, 2008.
ARCHIBUGI, Daniele. Pavitt’s taxonomy sixteen years on: A review article. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 10, pp. 415-425, 2001.
ARCHIBUGI, Daniele; CESARATTO, Sergio and SIRILLI, Giorgio. Sources of innovative activities
and industrial organization in Italy. Research Policy, v.20, p. 299-313, 1991.
BUSSAB, Wilton de Oliveira; MIAZAKI, Edina Shizue e ANDRADE, Dalton Francisco. Introdução
à Análise de Agrupamentos. Associação Brasileira de Estatística. ABE. 9° Simpósio Nacional de
Probabilidade e Estatística. São Paulo, julho, 1990.CAMPOS, Bruno C. Padrões Setoriais de Inovação na Indústria Brasileira em 2000. Dissertação de Mestrado. Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal Fluminense. Disponível em <http://www.uff.br/cpgeconomia/novosite/arquivos/tese/2005-bruno_campos.pdf>.
Acesso em 26/07/2011.
CAMPOS, Bruno C. e RUIZ, Ana U. Padrões Setoriais de Inovação na Indústria Brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), 8 (1), p.167-210, janeiro/junho, 2009.
CASTRO, Daniela Fernandes de. Padrões Setoriais da Inovação Tecnológica na Indústria Brasileira: Uma Análise de Cluster a Partir da Pintec, 2010.
COCKBURN, Ian M. and HENDERSON, Rebecca M. Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior,
and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, Volume
, pages 157-182, 1998.
COHEN, Wesley M. and WALSH, John P. Public research, patents and implications for industrial R&D in the drug, biotechnology, semiconductor and computer industries. In C.W. Wessner, ed., Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities: Government-Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001. pp 223-243, 2000.
COHEN, Wesley M.; FLORIDA, Richard and GOE, W. Richard. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States, (Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University), 1994.
COHEN, Wesley M.; NELSON, Richard R. and WALSH, John P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. Manufacturing firms patent (or not). Cambridge, Mass., National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.
COHEN, Wesley M.; NELSON, Richard R. and WALSH, John P. Links and impacts: the influence of public R&D on industrial research. Management Science, v. 48, n. 1, pp. 1-23, 2002.
DOSI, Giovanni; PAVITT, Keith; SOETE, Luc. The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. Londres: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.
ECLAC. Structural Change and Productivity Growth – 20 Years Late, Old Problems, New Opportunities. United Nations, Santiago, Chile, 2008.
FAGERBERG, Jan; MOWERY, David C and VERSPAGEN, Bart. Innovation-systems, path-dependency and policy: The co-evolution of science, technology and innovation policy and industrial structure in a small, resource-based economy. DIME Working paper 2008.1 in the series on Dynamics of Knowledge Accumulation, Competitiveness, Regional Cohesion and Economic Policies (DIME Working Package 3.1) June, 2008.
FLORIDA, Richard and COHEN, Wesley M. Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. In Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R. (Eds.). Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkage in Japan and the United States, The MIT Press, Boston, MA, 1999.
FREEMAN, Christopher. Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 13, n. 3, p.541-569, 1982.
GONÇALVES, Eduardo; LEMOS, Mauro. B. e DE NEGRI, João A. Determinantes do Esforço Inovador no Brasil. Anais do XXXV Encontro Nacional de Economia; ANPEC; Recife, 2007.
HAIR, Joseph F.; ANDERSON, Rolph E.; TATHAM, Ronald L., and BLACK, William C. Multivariate
Data Analysis- Fifth Edition. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1998.
KANNEBLEY JR., Sérgio; PORTO, Gerciane S. e PAZZELO, Elaine T. Anais Encontro Nacional de
Economia. Características das empresas inovadoras no Brasil: Uma análise empírica a partir da PINTEC, Porto Seguro. ANPEC, 2003. Disponível em:<http://www.anpec.org.br/encontro2003/artigos/D49.pdf>. Acesso em 01 de abril de 2010. 2003.
KATO, Mayumi; GOBARA, Erika; ROSSONI, Caio; CUNHA, Luciano e KINDL, Sieglinde. Padrões
de Cooperação Tecnológica entre Setores na Indústria Brasileira: Uma Análise Quantitativa dos Dados da PINTEC 2001-2003. RAI - Revista de Administração e Inovação, vol. 5, núm. 3, pp.
-140, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008.
KLEVORICK, Alvin K., LEVIN, Richard C., NELSON, Richard R. and WINTER Sidney G. On the
sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research
Policy 24:185-205, 1995.
LAURSEN. K. The effect of knowledge sources for export performance in manufacturing and services: Danish firm-level evidence. DRUID. Disponível em: <http://www.nupi.no/content/download/9191/96283/file/Paper%208.pdf>. Acesso em: 08/08/2011. 2008.
LEIPONEN, Aija and DREJER, Ina. What exactly are technological regimes? Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities. Research Policy 36:1221–1238, 2007.
LEVIN, Richard C.; KLEVORICK, Alvin K.; NELSON, Richard R. and WINTER, Sidney G. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 783-820, 1987.
MALERBA, Franco. Learning by firms and incremental technical change. The Economic Journal,
v.102, n.413, p.845-859, Jul., 1992.
MALERBA, Franco. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31: 247-264, 2002.
MALERBA, Franco and NELSON, Richard. Catching up in different sectoral system. Disponível em <http://umconference.um.edu.my/upload/43-/papers/198%20FrancoMalerba_RichardNelson.
pdf>. Acesso em 05/02/2011. 2010.
MANSFIELD, Edwin , and LEE, Jeong-Yeon. The Modern University: Contribut or to Industrial
Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support. Resear ch Poli cy 25: 1047–1058, 1996.
NELSON, Richard R. e WINTER, Sidney G. Uma Teoria Evolucionária da Mudança Econômica.
Campinas, Editora da UNICAMP, 2005. 1982.
PAVITT, Keith. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13: 343-373, 1984.
PAVITT, Keith. Changing Patterns of Usefulness of University Research: Opportunities and Dangers Sectoral. Disponível em <http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/papers/200210_pavitt.pdf>.
Acesso em 26/07/2011. 2002.
QUADROS, Ruy; FURTADO, André; BERNARDES, Roberto e FRANCO, Eliane. Technological
innovation in Brazilian industry: an assessment based on the São Paulo innovation survey. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 67, p. 203–219, 2002.
RUIZ, Ana Urraca e BHAWAN, Renata. Diferenças de comportamento inovador entre empresas nacionais e estrangeiras no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Inovação Rio de Janeiro (RJ), 9 (1), p.
-68, janeiro/junho, 2010.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. G. Allen & Unwin, Londres, 1976. 1943.
SILVA, Conceição de F. Indústria metalúrgica básica brasileira: perfil setorial, inovatividade e interatividade. Tese de doutorado. Campinas, UNICAMP, 2011. Disponível em http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=000840644&fd=y. Acesso em 20/05/2012. 2011.
SOM, Oliver; DREHER Carsten and MALOCA Spomenka. Innovation patterns of non-R&D performing firms in the German manufacturing industry. An evolutionary approach to heterogeneity in firms ‘ innovation strategy. International Schumpeter Society Conference 2010 on Innovation, Organisation, Sustainability and Crises. Aalborg, June 21-24, 2010.
TAMM, Dorel; REILJAN, Ele; and SEPPO, Marge. Is There Sector Specificity in the Cooperation
Potential and Propensity to Innovate? The Evidence from Estonia. Majandusteaduse Seltsi II
aastakonverents; Pärnu, 12.-13. jaanuar 2007. Disponível em <http://www.emselts.ee/konverentsi/EMS2007/Tamm_Reiljan_Seppo.pdf>. Acesso em 16/10/2011. 2007.
VAN DIJK, Michiel. “The determinants of export performance in developing countries: the case of Indonesian Manufacturing”. Working Paper 02.01. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies. Disponível em: <http://demo.uib.es/courses/econometrics/Exports.pdf>. Acesso em 21/10/2011. 2002.
VIOTTI, Eduardo B. National Learning Systems A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69, 653–680, 2002.
ZUCOLOTO, Graziela F. Inovação Tecnológica na Indústria Brasileira: Uma Análise Setorial. Dissertação
de Mestrado. São Paulo, USP, 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/
disponiveis/12/12140/tde-30082004-161640/pt-br.php>. Acesso em 26/07/2011. 2004.
ZUCOLOTO, Graziela F. e TONETO JR., Rudinei. Esforço tecnológico da indústria de transformação brasileira uma comparação com países selecionados. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, 9(2): 337-365, mai./ago., 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Conceição de Fátima Silva, Wilson Suzigan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.
