Eficiência para escolas de ensino fundamental do Nordeste e Sudeste Brasileiro: uma abordagem em trés estágios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612014000400001Keywords:
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Efficiency, Education, Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), Socioeconomic Status (SES), Prova BrasilAbstract
In this study, we calculated a measure of technical efficiency for urban public schools in
the Northeast and Southeast of Brazil; evaluated by a battery of tests called Prova Brasil;
year 2007, using Three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology; taking
the school as unit of analysis. Based on our results we can say that there are margins
for improvements in Brazilian urban public schools in terms of pure managerial ability.
Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE EMPRESAS DE PESQUISA. Critério de Classificação Econômica
Brasil: Dados com base no Levantamento Socioeconômico 2006 e 2007 – IBOPE. 2009.
AIGNER, D.; LOVELL, C. A. K.; SCHMIDT, P. Formulation and Estimation is Stochastic Frontier
Production Function Models. Journal of Econometrics, p. 21-37, 1977.
BANKER, R. D.; CHARNES, A.; COOPER, W. W. Some Models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Sciences, v. 30, p. 1078-1092, set. de 1984.
BANKER, R. D; R.C. MOREY. Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research, v. 34, p. 513-521, 1986.
BANKER, R. D.; NATARAJAN, R. Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, v.56, p. 48-58, 2008.
BRADLEY, S.; JOHNES, G.; MILLINGTON. The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. European Journal of Operational Research, v.135, n. 3, 2001.
CAUDILL, S. B.; FORD, J.M. Biases in Frontier estimation due to heteroscedasticity. Economics
Letters, p. 17–20, 1993.
COOPER, W.; SEIFORD, L.M.; TONE, KAORU. Data Envelopment Analysis. 2a Ed: Editora Springer. 2007.
CORDERO, J. M.; PEDRAJA, F.; D. SANTÍN. Alternative approaches to include exogenous variables in DEA measures: A Comparison using Monte Carlo. Computers and Operations Research, v. 36, p. 2699-2706, 2009.
DELGADO, V. M. S.; MACHADO, A. F. Eficiência das Escolas Públicas Estaduais de Minas Gerais.
Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico (PPE), p. 427-464, 2007.
FARENZENA, N. (Org.) Custos e condições de qualidade da educação em escolas públicas: aportes de estudos regionais. Brasília: INEP/MEC, 2005.
FARRELL, M. J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, v. 120, n. 03, p. 253-290, 1957.
FRANCO, C. et al. Qualidade e equidade em educação: reconsiderando o significado de “fatores intraescolares”.
Ensaio: avaliação e políticas públicas em educação, v.15, n. 55, Rio de Janeiro,
abr./jun. de 2007.
FRIED; H. O. et al. Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, p.157-174, 2002.
FRIED; H. O.; LOVELL, C. A. K.; Schmidt, S. S. Efficiency and Productivity. In: FRIED, H. O.;
LOVELL, C. A. K.; SCHMIDT; S. S. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity
growth. Oxford University Press, 2008.
GLEWWE, P.; HANUSHEK, E.; HUMPAGE, S.; RAVINA, R. School resources and educational
outcomes in developing countries: a review of the literature from 1990 to 2010.Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics, Working Paper WP12-1, jan. de 2012.
GUTIERREZ, R. G.; CARTER, S.; DRUKKER, D. M. sg160: On boundary-value likelihood-ratio tests.
Stata Technical Bulletin, n. 60, p. 15–18. Reimpresso em: Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, v.
, p. 269–273, College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2001.
HANUSHEK, E. A. The evidence on class size. Occasional paper n. 98-1, 1998.
HANUSHEK, E. A.; KIMKO, D. D. Schooling, Labor-Force Quality, and the Growth of Nations. The American Economic Review, p. 1184-1208, 2000.
HANUSHEK, E. A.; LAVY, V.; HITOMI, K. D. Do students care about school quality? Determinants
of dropout behavior in developing countries. NBERWP 12737, 2006.
IBGE. rm_atualizada_2008.xls, 14 de dez. de 2011a. Disponível em: <ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/organizacao_territorial/municipios_por_regioes_metropolitanas/>. Acesso em: 22 de mai. de 2012.
IBGE. tab2.xls. Brasil.zip. Indicadores Sociais Municipais: uma análise dos resultados do universo do Censo Demográfico. Censo 2010, nov. de 2011b. Disponível em: <http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/indicadores_sociais_municipais/indicadores_sociais_municipais_tab_zip.shtm>. Acesso em: 27 de fev. de 2012.
INEP. Microdados Censo Escolar 2007. 2007a.
INEP. Microdados Prova Brasil 2007. 2007b.
INEP. Portal INEP. Disponível em: < http://portal.inep.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 24 de jan. de 2011.
KENDALL, M. G. A. New Measure of Rank Correlation. Biometrika, v. 30, n. 1/2, p. 81-93, jun. de
Disponível em: < http://www.jstor.org/pss/2332226>. Acesso em: 02 de jan. de 2012.
MENEZES-FILHO, N.; RIBEIRO, F. P. Os determinantes da melhoria do rendimento escolar. In: VELOSO, F. et al. (Org.). Educação Básica no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2009. cap. 08, p. 171-188.
OECD. Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, 2011.
RAY, S. C. Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data. Management Science, v. 37, n. 12, p. 1620-1628, dez. de 1991.
RIORDAN, C. Equality and Achievement: An Introduction to the Sociology of education. 2. ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
RUGGIERO, J. On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 553-565, 1996.
RUGGIERO, J. Non-discretionary inputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 461-469, 1998.
SAITECH DEA- Solver -PRO: Professional Version 8.0. 2012.
SAMPAIO DE SOUSA, M. C.; STOSIC, B. D. Technical efficiency of the Brazilian municipalities:
correcting nonparametric frontier measurements for outliers. Journal of Productivity Analysis,
v. 24, p. 155-179, 2005.
SLATE, J. R.; JONES, C. H. Effects of school size: A review of the literature with recommendations. Essays in Education, v. 13, 2005.
SPEARMAN, C. The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. The American
Journal of Psychology, v. 15, n. 01, p. 72-101, jan. de 1904.
STATACORP. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, Texas: Stata Corp LP.2009b.
THANASSOULIS, E.; PORTELA, M. C. S.; DESPIĆ, O. Data Envelopment Analysis: the mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. In: FRIED, H. O.; Lovell, C. A. K.; SCHMIDT; S. S. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2008. cap. 3, p. 251-420.
TONE, K.; TSUISUI, M. Tuning regression results for use in multi-stage data adjustment approach of DEA. Journal of the Operations Research, v.52, n.02, p. 76-85, 2009.
WILSON, P. W. Efficiency in Education Production among PISA Countries, with Emphasis on Transitioning Economies. Jun. de 2005.
WITZIERS, B.; R. J. BOSKER; M. L. KRÜGER. Educational Leadership and Student Achievement: The Elusive Search for an Association. Educational Administration, v. 39, p. 398-425, ago. de 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Luciana Duarte Bhering de Carvalho, Maria da Conceicao Sampaio de Sousa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.
