Ricardo, o tempo e o valor

Authors

  • Rogério Arthmar Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612014000100005

Keywords:

Ricardian economics, Labor theory of value, Time, Profit rate

Abstract

This paper reviews the evolution of the Ricardian theory of value in its connection with
the element time. Initially, Ricardo’s first version of the general law of exchange is briefly
inspected. After that, a numerical illustration of the formula for competitive prices
is detailed, while some light is shed on how the factor time arose in the discussions
about the theory advanced in the Principles. Next, the simplified version of the norm of
value introduced in the book’s third edition is examined, as well as the central Ricardian
proposition that changes in the profit rate would have minimum impact on prices. The
last section shows that a generalization of the same example concocted by Ricardo,
incorporating multiple production periods, does not lend support to such assertion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALDRICH, John. Ricardo on value: the three chapter ones. University of Southampton, UK. Disponível em: <http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/staff/aldrich/ricardoindex.htm>. Acesso em 05 de março de 2013. Página criada em 2002.

BARKAI, Haim. The empirical assumptions of Ricardo’s 93% theory of value. Economica, New Series, 43, p. 418-423, 1967.

BLEANEY, Michael. Underconsumption theories. A history and critical analysis. New York, International Publishers, 1976.

COCHRANE, James L. The first mathematical Ricardian model. History of Political Economy, v. 23, n. 2, p. 419-431, Sep 1970.

HOLLANDER, Jacob. Two letters on the measure of value. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1936.

HOLLANDER, Samuel. The economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979.

LOPES, Francisco L. The Ricardo puzzle. History of Political Economy, v. 40, n. 1, p. 595-611, 2008.

McCULLOCH, John R. Mr. Ricardo’s theory of exchangeable value vindicated from the objections of R. The Edinburgh Magazine and Literary Miscellany, p. 429-431, November 1818.

O’BRIEN, Dennis P. The classical economists revisited. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.

PEACH, Terry. Interpreting Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

POLITICAL ECONOMY CLUB [PEC]. Minutes of proceedings, 1899-1920, roll of members and

questions discussed, 1821-1920. Volume VI. London: Macmillan, 1921.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. History of economic analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1963.

SOWELL, Thomas. 1972. Say’s Law. An historical analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

SRAFFA, Piero (Ed.) The works and correspondence of David Ricardo [Works]. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, vs. I-IX, 2004.

ST. CLAIR, Oswald. A key to Ricardo. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, “Reprints of Economic Classics”, 1965.

STIGLER, George. Ricardo and the 93% labor theory of value. The American Economic Review, v. 48, n. 3, p. 357-367, 1958.

TORRENS, Robert. Strictures on Mr. Ricardo’s doctrine respecting exchangeable value [1818]. In: P. D. GROENEWEGEN (ed.) The economists refuted and other early economic writings. Robert Torrens. Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley, p. 77-82, 1993.

WILSON, George W., PATE, James L. Ricardo’s 93% labor theory of value: a final comment. The

Journal of Political Economy, v. 76, n. 1, p. 128-136, 1968.

Published

30-03-2014

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Arthmar, R. (2014). Ricardo, o tempo e o valor. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 44(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612014000100005