Evidências sobre curva ambiental de Kuznets e convergência das emissões

Authors

  • Ednilson Sebastião Avila Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. Universidade de São Paulo
  • Eliezer Martins Diniz Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-4161201545197ese

Keywords:

Environmental Kuznets Curve, Convergence of emissions, Economic growth

Abstract

Recently many researchers started to study the relationship between economic growth
and pollution. Two distinct approaches followed from these studies: the Environmental
Kuznets Curve (EKC) and the convergence of emissions. In this context, Brock and Taylor
(2010) built a model that makes a bridge between both methodologies, as convergence
of emissions implies the EKC. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the EKC (in a
traditional way) and the model proposed by Brock and Taylor (2010) in order to verify if
the results reinforce each other. The estimates of the curve were sensitive to the model
chosen. The estimates of the model pointed to evidence of conditional convergence of
per capita emissions and of the EKC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ednilson Sebastião Avila, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. Universidade de São Paulo

    Doutorando em Economia Aplicada pela Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz - ESALQ/USP. Mestre em Economia Aplicada pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto - FEA/RP - USP.

  • Eliezer Martins Diniz, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto

    Professor associado no departamento de economia da FEA/RP. Área: Crescimento econômico e desenvolvimento econômico sustentável

References

ARELLANO, M.; BOVER, O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, v. 68, n. 1, p. 29–51, 1995.

AUCI, S.; BECCHETTI, L. The instability of the adjusted and unadjusted Environmental Kuznets

Curves. Ecological Economics, v. 60, p. 282–298, 2006.

BALTAGI, B. H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3. ed. Inglaterra: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.

BANCO MUNDIAL. World Development Indicators. Estados Unidos, 2011.

BARRO, R. J.; SALA-i-MARTIN. Economic Growth – second edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.

BAUMOL, W. J.; OATES, W. E. The theory of environmental policy – second edition. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1988.

BLUNDELL, R.; BOND, S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, v. 87, p. 115–143, 1998.

BREITUNG, J.; PESARAM, M. H. Unit roots and cointegration in panels. Frankfurt: Deutsche Bundesbank, 2005.

BROCK, W. A.; TAYLOR, M. S. The green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth, v. 15, p.

–153, 2010.

CAMERON, A. C.; TRIVEDI, P. K. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

CAMPBELL, J. Y.; MANKIW, N. G. Consumption, income, and interest rates: reinterpreting the time series evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, v. 4, p. 185-216, 1989.

CARVALHO, T. S.; ALMEIDA, E. A hipótese da Curva de Kuznets Ambiental Global: uma perspectiva econométrico-espacial. Estudos Econômicos, v. 40, n. 3, p. 587–615, p. 1149–1159, 2010.

CHENG, S. Y.; WEI, J. S.; HOU, H. A cointegration analysis of purchasing power parity and country risk. International Journal of Business and Economics, v. 7, p. 199-211, 2008.

COLE, M. A.; ELLIOT, R. J. R.; AZAR, A. K. The determinants of trade in pollution intensive industries: North South evidence. University of Birmingham, 2001.

DASGUPTA, S.; LAPLANTE, B.; WANG, H.; WHEELER, D. Confronting the Environmental Kuznets

Curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 16, p. 147-168, 2002.

DE BRUYN, S. M. Economic Growth and the Environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

DINDA, S. A theoretical basis for the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, v. 53, p. 403 – 413, 2005.

DINIZ, E. M. Crescimento, poluição e o Protocolo de Quioto: uma avaliação do caso brasileiro.

São Paulo: Banco Santos / Universidade de Oxford, 2001.

DINIZ, E. M. Lessons from the Kyoto protocol. Ambiente e Sociedade, v. 10, n. 1, p. 27–38, 2007.

FONSECA, L. N.; RIBEIRO, E. P. Preservação ambiental e crescimento econômico no brasil. In:

Encontro de economia da Região Sul, VII. Rio Grande do Sul: [s.n.], 2005.

GROSSMAN, G. M.; KRUEGER, A. B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.

GROSSMAN, G. M.; KRUEGER, A. B. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 110, p. 353–377, 1995.

HESTON, A.; SUMMERS, R.; BETTINA, A. Penn World Table Version 7.0. Center for International

Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, Maio, 2011.

HILTON, F. G. H.; LEVINSON, A. Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: evidence from automotive lead emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 35, p. 126–141, 1998.

INTERNACIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Paris: IEA, 2010.

ISLAM, N. Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 110, n. 4, p. 1127–1170, 1995.

ISLAM, N. What have we learnt from the convergence debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, v. 17, n. 3, p. 309–362, 2003.

LEVIN, A.; LIN, C. F.; CHU, C. S. J. Unit roots tests in panel data: asymptotic finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, v. 108, p. 1-24, 2002.

LIST, J. A. Have air pollutant emissions converged among U.S. regions? Evidence from unit root tests. Southern Economic Journal, v. 66, n. 1, p. 144–155, 1999.

MEADOWS, D. H. et al. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972.

PANAYOTOU, T. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Technology and Employment Programme, 1993.

PEDRONI, P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v. 61, p. 653–670, 1999.

PEDRONI, P. Fully modified ols for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, v. 15, p. 93–130, 2000.

PEDRONI, P. Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory, v. 20, p. 597-625, 2004.

PERMAN, R.; MA, Y.; COMMON, M.; MADDISON, D.; McGILVRAY, J. Natural Resource and

Environmental Economics – 4th edition. Essex: Pearson, 2011.

ROMER, D. Advanced Macroeconometrics. 2. ed. Nova Iorque: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

SELDEN, T. M.; SONG, D. Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets Curve for

air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 27, n. 2, p.

–162, 1994.

SHAFIK, N.; BANDYOPADHYAY, S. Economic growth and environmental quality: a time series and cross-country evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v. 4, p. 1–24, 1992.

SOLOW, R. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 70, p. 65-94, 1956.

STERN, D. I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, v. 32, p.

–1439, 2004.

STOKEY, N. L. Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1–31, 1998.

WAGNER, M. The carbon Kuznets Curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resource and Energy Economics, v. 30, p. 388–408, 2008.

WESTERLUND, J. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v. 69, p. 709–748, 2007.

Published

30-03-2015

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Avila, E. S., & Diniz, E. M. (2015). Evidências sobre curva ambiental de Kuznets e convergência das emissões. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 45(1), 97-126. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-4161201545197ese