Robustez de regressões de crescimento frente à incerteza sobre a especificação do modelo: quão robustos são os regressores para o caso brasileiro?

Authors

  • Christiano Modesto Penna Universidade Federal do Ceará
  • Fabricio Carneiro Linhares Universidade Federal do Ceará

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-416145497cpf

Keywords:

Growth regressions, Model averaging, Jackknife Model Averaging

Abstract

Although there is a vast literature that seeks to identify robust regressors able to influence
economic growth at the international level, this issue still needs research that have
satisfactory results for the Brazilian case. This article aims to contribute to the identification
of robust variables that influence the Brazilian economic growth. The Resende
and Figueiredo (2010) dataset is reviewed and we seek to circumvent the problem of
uncertainty about the model specification. For this purpose, a Frequentist Model Averaging
technique proposed in Hansen and Racine (2012) is used. This method is known by Jackknife Model Averaging and it is not as restrictive as the Extreme Bound Analysis
and not as permissive as the approach of Sala-i-Martin (1997). The results suggest
that, among the 22 investigated covariates, only the overall tax burden would have
significant influence on growth. In general, our results remain indicating caution when
working with growth regressions that use state data. Moreover, the work motivates
further studies and draws attention to the importance of resuming this line of research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AZZONI, C. et al. Geography and income convergence among Brazilian states. 2000.

BARRO, R. J.; SALA-I-MARTIN, X. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, p. 223-251, 1992.

BATES, J. M.; GRANGER, C. WJ. The combination of forecasts. OR, p. 451-468, 1969.

BUCKLAND, S. T.; BURNHAM, K. P.; AUGUSTIN, N. H. Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics, p. 603-618, 1997.

BURNHAM, K. P.; ANDERSON, D. R. Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model

selection. Sociological Methods & Research, v. 33, n. 2, p. 261-304, 2004.

CAMPOS, J.; ERICSSON, N. R.; HENDRY, D. F. General-to-specific modeling: an overview and

selected bibliography. 2005.

DURLAUF, S. N.; JOHNSON, P. A.; TEMPLE, J. RW. Growth econometrics. Handbook of Economic

Growth, v. 1, p. 555-677, 2005.

DURLAUF, S. N.; QUAH, D. T. The new empirics of economic growth. Handbook of Macroeconomics, v. 1, p. 235-308, 1999.

ELLERY JR; FERREIRA, P. Convergência entre a renda per capita dos estados brasileiros. Revista de Econometria, v. 16, n. 1, p. 83-103, 1996.

FERNANDEZ, C.; LEY, E.; STEEL, M. FJ. Model uncertainty in cross-country growth regressions.

Journal of Applied Econometrics, v. 16, n. 5, p. 563-576, 2001.

FERREIRA, A. Concentração regional e dispersão das rendas per capita estaduais: um comentário. Estudos Econômicos, v. 29, n. 1, p. 47-63, jan./mar. 1999. [ Links ]

FERREIRA, A. Convergence in Brazil: recent trends and long-run prospects. Applied Economics, 32, p. 479-489, 2000. [ Links ]

FERREIRA, A. Evolução recente da renda per capita estaduais no Brasil: o que a nova evidência mostra. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, v. 27, n. 3, p. 363-374, jul/set. 1996.

FERREIRA, A.; DINIZ, C. Convergência entre as rendas per capita estaduais no Brasil. Revista de Economia Política, v. 15, n. 4 (60), 1995.

HANSEN, B. E. Least squares model averaging. Econometrica, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1175-1189, 2007.

HANSEN, B. E.; RACINE, J. S. Jackknife model averaging. Journal of Econometrics, v. 167, n. 1, p.

-46, 2012.

HELMS, L. Jay. The Effect of State and Local Taxes on Economic Growth: A Time Series--Cross Section Approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, p. 574-582, 1985.

HENDRY, D. F.; DOORNIK, J. A. Empirical econometric modelling using PcGive 10. Timberlake

Consultants, 2001.

HENDRY, D. F.; KROLZIG, Hans-Martin. We Ran One Regression*.Oxford bulletin of Economics

and Statistics, v. 66, n. 5, p. 799-810, 2004.

HJORT, N. L.; CLAESKENS, G. Frequentist model average estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 98, n. 464, p. 879-899, 2003.

HOETING, J. A. et al. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Statistical science, p. 382-401, 1999.

HOOVER, K. D.; PEREZ, S. J. Truth and Robustness in Cross-country Growth Regressions*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, v. 66, n. 5, p. 765-798, 2004.

JUDGE, G. G.; BOCK, M. E. The Statistical Implications of Pre-Test and Stein-Rule Estimators in

Econometrics. 1978.

KABAILA, P. On variable selection in linear regression. Econometric Theory, v. 18, n. 04, p. 913-925, 2002.

LEAMER, E. E. Sensitivity analyses would help. The American Economic Review, v. 75, n. 3, p.

-313, 1985.

LEAMER, E.; LEONARD, H. Reporting the fragility of regression estimates. The Review of Economics and Statistics, v. 65, n. 2, p. 306-317, 1983.

LEVINE, R.; RENELT, D. A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review, p. 942-963, 1992.

MAGNUS, J. R. The traditional pretest estimator. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, v. 44, n. 2, p. 293-308, 2000.

MALLOWS, C. L. Some comments on C p. Technometrics, v. 15, n. 4, p. 661-675, 1973.

MANKIW, N. G.; ROMER, D.; WEIL, D. N. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 107, n. 2, p. 407-437, 1992.

MINIER, J. Nonlinearities and Robustness in Growth Regressions. The American Economic Review, v. 97, n. 2, p. 388-392, 2007.

MORAL-BENITO, E.; DE ESPANA, Banco. Model averaging in economics: An overview. Banco de

España Working Paper, 2012.

PENNA, C.; LINHARES, F. Há controvérsia entre análises de beta e sigma-convergência no Brasil?.

Revista Brasileira de Economia, v. 67, n. 1, p. 121-145, 2013.

RESENDE, G. M.; DE FIGUEIREDO, L. Testes de robustez: Uma aplicação para os determinantes do crescimento econômico estadual brasileiro entre 1960 e 2000. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, Fortaleza, v. 41, n. 1, 2010.

SALA-I-MARTIN, X. X. I just ran two million regressions. The American Economic Review, p. 178-183, 1997.

SOLOW, R. M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 70, n. 1, p. 65-94, 1956.

TUKEY, J. W. Kinds of Bootstraps and Kinds of Jackknives, Discussed in Terms of a Year of Weather--Related Data. PRINCETON UNIV NJ DEPT OF STATISTICS, 1987.

TURKHEIMER, F. E.; HINZ, R.; CUNNINGHAM, V. J. On the Undecidability Among Kinetic

Models: From Model Selection to Model Averaging. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow &

Metabolism, v. 23, n. 4, p. 490-498, 2003.

WAGENMAKERS, Eric-Jan; FARRELL, S. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic

Bulletin & Review, v. 11, n. 1, p. 192-196, 2004.

WANG, H.; ZHANG, X.; ZOU, G. Frequentist model averaging estimation: A review. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, v. 22, n. 4, p. 732-748, 2009.

ZHANG, X.; WAN, A. TK; ZOU, G. Model averaging by jackknife criterion in models with dependent data. Journal of Econometrics, v. 174, n. 2, p. 82-94, 2013.

ZINI Jr., A. A. Regional income convergence in Brazil and its socio-economic determinants. Economia Aplicada, v. 2, n. 2, p. 383-411, abr./jun. 1998.

Published

01-12-2015

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Penna, C. M., & Linhares, F. C. (2015). Robustez de regressões de crescimento frente à incerteza sobre a especificação do modelo: quão robustos são os regressores para o caso brasileiro?. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 45(4), 897-925. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-416145497cpf