Inequality aversion and preferences for redistribution: Does the perception of economic mobility affect them in Brazil?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-416146193ymfKeywords:
inequality aversion, preferences for redistribution, prospects of future mobilityAbstract
The notion that redistribution is from the rich to the poor a priori could lead to the conclusion that the poor are the main supporters of redistributive policies, since they are the potential beneficiaries. Nevertheless, evidence for developed countries suggests that inequality aversion and preferences for redistribution are shaped by factors beyond pecuniary concerns. This paper analyzes the effect of subjective economic mobility on inequality aversion and on the demand for redistribution, employing a unique dataset collected in 2012, which is representative of the Brazilian population. In contrast with theoretical predictions and empirical evidence for developed countries, results suggest that even people who aspire to ascend socially in the future dislike inequality and support redistributive policies. Individuals who perceived a decline in their social situation have also shown support for redistribution, which is a more standard result. Both sets of results are confirmed by estimations undertaken on subsamples defined according to family income. Some hypotheses are raised attempting to explain the unexpected results.
Downloads
References
ABATEMARCO, Antonio. Is income mobility socially desirable? Technical report, University of
Napoli, 2004.
ALESINA, Alberto; ANGELETOS, George-Marios. Fairness and redistribution. American Economic
Review. V. 95, n. 4, p. 960 – 980, 2005.
ALESINA, Alberto; FUCHS-SCHÜNDELN, Nicola. Good-Bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of Communism
on people’s preferences. American Economic Review. V. 97, n. 4, p. 1507–1528, 2006.
ALESINA, Alberto; GIULIANO, Paola. Preferences for redistribution. In: BENHABI, J.; JACKSON,
M.; BISIN, A. (Org.). Handbook of Social Economics. The Netherlands: North Holland, V. 1A,
p. 93-131, 2011.
ALESINA, Alberto; GLAESER, Edward; SACERDOTE, Bruce. Why Doesn’t the United States have
a European-Style welfare state? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. V. 2, 2001.
ALESINA, Alberto; LA FERRARA, Eliana. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities.
Journal of Public Economics. V. 89, p. 897–931, 2005.
ANTIGO, Mariangela; Machado Ana Flávia. Mobilidade intrageracional de rendimentos no Brasil.
Revista de Economia Política. V. 33 (1), p. 166-178, 2013.
BARRO, Robert; McCLEARY, Rachel, Political Economy and Religion in the Spirit of Max Weber.
Stanford University Press, 2007.
BÉNABOU, Roland; OK, Efe. Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The Poum hypothesis.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics. V. 116, n. 2, p. 447-487, 2001.
BÉNABOU, Roland; TIROLE, Jean. Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly
Journal of Economics. V. 121, n. 2, p. 699–746, 2006.
BOWLES, Samuel; GINTIS, Herbert. ¿Ha pasado de moda la igualdad? El Homo reciprocans y el futuro
de las políticas igualitaristas. In: GARGARELLA, R.; OVEJERO, F. (Org.). Razones para el
Socialismo. Ed. Paidós, Barcelona – España. 2001. ISBN 84-493-119-5, 2001.
BRITO, Alessandra; FOGUEL, Miguel; KERSTENETZKY, Celia. Afinal, Qual A Contribuição Da
Política De Valorização Do Salário Mínimo Para A Queda Da Desigualdade No Brasil? Uma
Estimativa Para O Período 1995-2013. Discussion Paper No. 109, Center for Studies on Inequality
and Development (CEDE), Dezembro, 2015.
CHECHI, Daniele; FILIPPIN, Antonio. An experimental study of the POUM hypothesis. In: COWELL,
F. (ed.). Inequality, Welfare and Income Distribution: Experimental Approaches. Emerald Group
Publishing Limited, v. 11, p. 115–136, 2011.
COJOCARU, Alexandru. Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from
the Life in Transition Survey. European Journal of Political Economy. V. 34, p. 300–314, 2014.
CORNEO, Giacomo; GRÜNER, Hans Peter. Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal
of Public Economics, V. 83, p. 83–107, 2002.
CRAMER Brian; KAUFMAN, Robert. Views of economic inequality in Latin America. Comparative
Political Studies. V. 44 (9), p. 1206–37, 2011.
CRUCES, Guillermo; PEREZ, Ricardo; TETAZ, Martin. Biased perceptions of income distribution and
preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics.
V. 98, p. 100-112, 2013.
DE TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis. Democracy in America. Nueva York, Penguin Classics. 2003. Publicação
original em 1835.
FERREIRA, Francisco; LEITE, Phillippe; LICHFIELD, Julie; ULYSSEA, Gabriel. Ascensão e queda
da desigualdade de renda no Brasil. Econômica. V. 8, n. 1, p. 147-169, junho 2006.
FERREIRA, Francisco; MESSINA, Julian; RIGOLINI, Jamele; LÓPEZ-CALVA, Luis-Felipe; LUGO;
Ana María; VAKIS; Renos. Economic Mobility and the Rise of the Latin American Middle
Class. World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies No. 11858. Washington, D.C.: World
Bank, 2013.
FERREIRA, Sergio; VELOSO, Fernando. Intergenerational mobility of wages in Brazil. Brazilian
Review of Econometrics. V. 26, p.181–211, 2006.
FIELDS, Gary. Economic and social mobility really are multifaceted. Paper presented on Frontiers on
Social and Economic Mobility Conference. New York: Cornell University, March 2004.
FIELDS, Gary; OK, Efe. The measurement of income mobility: An introduction to the literature [Electronic
version]. In J. Silber (Ed.) Handbook on income inequality measurement (pp. 557-596).
Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
FIGUEIREDO, Erik. O impacto da mobilidade de renda sobre o bem-estar econômico no Brasil. Economia
Aplicada. V. 13 (3), 2009.
FIGUEIREDO, Erik; ZIEGELMANN, Flávio Augusto. Algumas Simulações de Efeitos de Mobilidade
de Renda Sobre o Nível de Bem-Estar. Revista Brasileira de Economia. V. 63, 2009.
FONG, Cristina. Social Preferences, Self-Interest and the Demand for Redistribution. Journal of Public
Economics, V. 82, p. 225 – 246, 2001.
FRIEDMAN, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
GAVIRIA, Alejandro. Social Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution in Latin America. Economía,
V. 8, n. 1, p. 55-96, 2007.
GRAHAM, Carol; PETTINATO, Stefano. Happiness and hardship: Opportunity and insecurity in new
market economies. World Economics. V.1, n. 4, p. 73-112, Outubro – Dezembro 2000.
GUISO, Luigi; SAPIENZA, Paola; ZINGALES, Luigi. People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes.
Journal of Monetary Economics V. 50, p. 225–282, 2003.
HIRSCHMAN, Albert; ROTSCHILD, Michael. The changing tolerance for income inequality in the
course of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, V. 87, n. 4, p. 544-566, 1973.
KERTENETZKY, Celia; UCHOA, Christiane; Silva, Nelson. Padrões de consumo e estilos de vida da
“nova classe média”. 37º ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ANPOC, Águas de Lindóia, Setembro
de 2013.
LINOS, Katerina; WEST, Martin. Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution: Readdressing
the issue of cross-national variation. European Sociological Review. V. 19, n. 4, p.
–409, 2003.
LONDOÑO, Juliana. Movilidad social, preferencias redistributivas y felicidad en Colombia. Revista
Desarrollo y Sociedad. II semestre, N. 68, p. 171–212, 2011.
MELTZER, Allan; RICHARD, Scott. A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political
Economy. V. 89, p. 914-927, 1981.
NASCIMENTO, Marcos Aurélio; SOUZA, André Portela. Medidas e determinantes dos rendimentos
do trabalho no Brasil. ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ECONOMIA, Natal, 2005.
PASTORE, José; SILVA, Nelson. Mobilidade social no Brasil. Makron Books. São Paulo, 2000.
PERO, Valéria. Mobilidade social no Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Economia Mackenzie. V. 4, n. 4, p.
–153, 2006.
PIKETTY, Thomas. Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
V. 110, n. 3, p. 551–584, 1995.
PITTAU, Maria Grazia; MASSARI, Riccardo; ZELLI, Roberto. Hierarchical modeling of disparities
in preferences for redistribution. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. V. 75, n. 4, p.
–584, 2013.
RAVAILLON, Martin; LOKSHIN, Michael. Who want to redistribute? The tunnel effect in 1990 Russia.
Journal of Public Economics. V. 76, p. 87–104, 2000.
REIS, Elisa. Percepções da elite sobre pobreza e desigualdade. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais.
V. 15, n. 42, 2000.
RIBEIRO, Carlos Antonio. Estrutura de classe e mobilidade social no Brasil. Bauru, São Paulo, Edusc.
312 p.; 23 cm.
RIBEIRO, Carlos Antonio. Quatro décadas de mobilidade social no Brasil, DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais. Rio de
Janeiro, v. 55, n. 3, p. 641- 679, 2012.
ROCHA, Rudi, URANI, André. Posicionamento social e a hipótese da distribuição de renda desconhecida.
Brasil: quão pobres, quão ricos e quão desiguais nos percebemos?. Revista de Economia
Política. São Paulo, v. 27, n. 4, p. 595–615, outubro-dezembro 2007.
SCHEVE, Kenneth; STASAVAGE, David. Religion and preferences for social insurance. Quarterly
Journal of Political Science. V. 1, p. 255–286, 2006.
SILVA, Cleiton; FIGUEIREDO, Erik. Movilidad social y demanda de redistribución del ingreso en
América Latina. Revista de la CEPAL, v. 110, p. 69-84, 2013.
SOARES, Sergei. Análise de bem-estar e decomposição por fatores da queda na desigualdade entre
e 2004. Econômica, v. 8, p. 83-115, 2006.
STEGMUELLER, Daniel; SCHEEPERS, Peer; ROB DEUTSCHER, Sigrid; DE JONG, Eelke. Support
for Redistribution in Western Europe. Assessing the role of religion. European Sociological
review. V. 16, p. 1 – 16, 2011.
TOTH, István; KELLER, Tamás. Income Distribution, Inequality Perceptions, and Redistributive
Preferences in European. In Gornick, J.C. & Jäntti, M. (Eds), Income Inequality: Economic
Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries (pp.173-203), California: Stanford University
Press, 2014.
WALTENBERG, Fábio. Are Latin Americans - Brazilians in particular - willing to support an unconditional
citizen’s income?, In: LO VUOLO, R. (Org.). Citizen’s Income and Welfare Regimes in
Latin America. From Cash Transfers to Rights. 2013. Palgrave Macmillan, January 2013. 286 p.
ISBN: 978-0-230-33821-0.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Yasmín Salazar Méndez, Fábio Domingues Waltenberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article, the author authorizes its publication and attests that it has not been submitted to any other journal. The original article is considered final. Articles selected for publication are proofread for grammatical and orthographic errors. The journal does not pay rights for published articles. The Institute of Economic Research from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo) owns the journal's copyright.
