Mantener el orden y el sentido”: percepciones y experiencias de estudiantes con la matriz de diseño de investigación

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202652294313es

Palavras-chave:

Enseñanza de la investigación, Matriz de diseño de investigación, Pedagogía de investigación

Resumo

Los educadores se enfrentan al reto de enseñar a diseñar una investigación a estudiantes sin experiencia previa en la realización de proyectos de esta naturaleza. Sin embargo, la literatura académica disponible sobre perspectivas pedagógicas, estrategias y herramientas para la enseñanza de los diseños de investigación es limitada. Para abordar este vacío, el presente trabajo exploró el uso de una matriz de diseño de investigación (MDI), propuesta en la literatura, como recurso para guiar a los estudiantes en las decisiones de diseño y establecer coherencia entre las partes de un proyecto de investigación. El análisis contó con la participación de estudiantes universitarios sin experiencia previa en la labor investigativa, quienes emplearon la MDI en dos asignaturas para conocer sus percepciones y valoraciones sobre esa herramienta. Mediante entrevistas y un análisis temático cualitativo, los hallazgos sugieren visiones tanto favorables como críticas. La matriz se percibe principalmente como un apoyo para mantener la coherencia en el proyecto y para orientar al formador en las distintas etapas del proceso. Aunque algunos estudiantes consideraron que la matriz era inicialmente confusa y cuestionaron su necesidad, futuras investigaciones podrían explorar los rasgos individuales que influyen en su aceptación, así como evaluar su transferibilidad, su eficacia percibida y su aplicación en distintos contextos disciplinares, con el fin de favorecer una mejor comprensión de su utilidad.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

CHOGUILL, Charles. The research design matrix: A tool for development planning research studies. Habitat

International, Oxford, v. 29, n. 4, p. 615-626, 2005.

CLEMENTE, Violeta; TSCHIMMEL, Katja; POMBO, Fátima. Matching research questions with a research

methodology: proposal for a didactic resource. The International Journal of Design Education,

Champaign, v. 16, n. 1, p. 155, 2022.

COYNE, Imelda. Sampling in qualitative research: purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear

boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, Oxford, v. 26, n. 3, p. 623-630, 1997.

EARLEY, Mark. A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education,

Abingdon, v. 19, n. 3, p. 242-253, 2014.

ERRANDONEA, Gabriel. Más allá del esquema: la matriz de diseño como herramienta didáctica, sin perder

de vista la epistemología. Integración y Conocimiento: Revista del Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones

en Educación Superior de Mercosur, Córdoba, v. 14, n. 2, p. 200-218, 2025.

GENTLES, Stephen James; CHARLES, Cathy; PLOEG, Jenny; MCKIBBON, Kathleen Ann. Sampling in

qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, Fort

Lauderdale, v. 20, n. 11, p. 1772-1789, 2015.

GRANEHEIM, Ulla Hällgren; LUNDMAN, Berit. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research:

Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, London, v. 24,

n. 2, p. 105-112, 2004.

GUEST, Greg; MACQUEEN, Kathleen; NAMEY, Emily. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.

HERNÁNDEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, Fernando; SANCHO-GIL, Juana. A learning process within an education

research group: An approach to learning qualitative research methods. International Journal of Social

Research Methodology, Abingdon, v. 18, n. 6, p. 651-667, 2015.

HOIDN, Sabine; OLBERT-BOCK, Sibylle. Learning and teaching research methods in management education:

Development of a curriculum to combine theory and practice - a Swiss case. International Journal of

Educational Management, Bingley, v. 30, n. 1, p. 43-62, 2016.

KANYENGO, Christine Wamunyima. Knowledge production practices in higher institutions of learning

in Zambia: a case of the University of Zambia. 2020. Tesis (Doctoral - PhD en Library and Information

Science) – University of Cape Town, South Africa, 2020.

KAUFMANN, Katja; PEIL, Corinna. The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI): Using WhatsApp to

enhance self-reporting and explore media usage in situ. Mobile Media & Communication, London, v. 8,

n. 2, p. 229-246, 2020.

KELLER, Daniel; KERR, Mary Margaret. Teaching a first-year research experience through archived oral

histories. College Teaching, Philadelphia, v. 70, n. 3, p. 328-336, 2022.

LEWTHWAITE, Sarah; NIND, Melanie. Teaching research methods in the social sciences: Expert perspectives

on pedagogy and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, Abingdon, v. 64, n. 4, p. 413-430, 2016.

MAXWELL, Joseph. A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2012.

MCGINN, Michelle; ROTH, Wolff-Michael. Preparing students for competent scientific practice: implications

of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, Washington, DC, v. 28,

n. 3, p. 14-24, 1999.

MURTONEN, Mari; LEHTINEN, Erno. Conceptions of research and methodology learning. Scandinavian

Journal of Educational Research, Stockholm, v. 49, n. 3, p. 217-224, 2005. https://doi.

org/10.1080/00313830500109519

NIND, Melanie; KATRAMADOU, Angeliki. Lessons for teaching social science research methods in higher

education: synthesis of the literature 2014-2020. British Journal of Educational Studies, Abingdon, v.

71, n. 3, p. 241-266, 2023.

NIND, Melanie; KILBURN, Daniel; LUFF, Rebekah. The teaching and learning of social research methods:

developments in pedagogical knowledge. International Journal of Social Research Methodology,

Abingdon, v. 18, n. 5, p. 455-461, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1062631

ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony; LEECH, Nancy. A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & Quantity,

Dordrecht, v. 41, p. 105-121, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1

ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony; SLATE, John; SCHWARTZ, Robert. Role of study skills in graduate-level educational

research courses. The Journal of Educational Research, Washington, DC, v. 94, n. 4, p. 238-246, 2001.

PEREIRA, Flávia Holz Meirelles; ARAÚJO, Luciano Vieira. The innovative engagement of external control with

artificial intelligence: evaluation model. RAP: Revista Brasileira de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro,

v. 59, n. 5, 2025.

RANSFORD, Edward; BUTLER, Gerald. Teaching research methods in the social sciences. Teaching

Sociology, Washington, DC, v. 9, n. 3, p. 291-312, 1982.

SALDAÑA, Jhonny. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2021.

STELMA, Juup; FAY, Richard. Intentionality and developing researcher competence on a UK master’s

course: An ecological perspective on research education. Studies in Higher Education, Abingdon, v. 39,

n. 4, p. 517–533, 2014.

SUBRAMANIAM, Karthigeyan. Teaching qualitative research: Concept mapping as an instructional strategy.

College Teaching, Philadelphia, v. 70, n. 1, p. 43-45, 2022.

TITCHEN, Angie; HOBSON, Dawn. Understanding phenomenology through reverse perspectives. In:

SOMEKH, Bridget; LEWIN, Cathy (ed.). Theory and methods in social research. 2. ed. London: Sage,

2011. p. 121-130.

WAGNER, Claire; GARNER, Mark; KAWULICH, Barbara. The state of the art of teaching research methods

in the social sciences: towards a pedagogical culture. Studies in Higher Education, Abingdon, v. 36, n. 1,

p. 75-88, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903452594

Publicado

2026-09-07

Edição

Seção

Seção Artigos

Como Citar

Mantener el orden y el sentido”: percepciones y experiencias de estudiantes con la matriz de diseño de investigación. (2026). Educação E Pesquisa, 52(00), e294313. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202652294313es