Feature interpretability and the positions of 2nd person possessives in Brazilian Portuguese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v18i2p199-229Keywords:
2nd person possessives. DP Concord. Number features. Syntactic position. Cardinals. NumP.Abstract
Interpretability and valuation of φ-features (Chomsky, 2001; Pesetsky and Torrego, 2007) have played a central role in the investigation of language universals. With regard to that, in standard Brazilian Portuguese (BP), as well as in other Romance languages, possessives have uninterpretable number features, which are valued via nominal agreement. However, dialects of BP, especially the one spoken in Minas Gerais, have shown that 2nd person possessives, in postnominal position, do not have number agreement with the noun. In order to account for these facts, I will argue that, in this grammar, number features on 2nd person possessives are reanalyzed as being: (i) associated with the person (rather than the noun) and (ii) interpretable. From the first postulation, ‘seu’ is expected to be the possessive for 2nd person singular, and ‘seus’ for 2nd person plural. From the second postulation, no number concord is expected to be triggered on the possessive. In addition, based on Danon (2011) and Norris (2014), I will argue that cardinals divide BP DPs into two domains in that phrases located above NumP are marked with the plural morpheme, while phrases below it are unmarked. In this sense, because prenominal possessives precede cardinals (NumP), they must be marked with the plural morpheme for nominal agreement; whereas postnominal possessives, which follow NumP, must be unmarked. Free from the plural marking associated with nominal agreement, postnominal 2nd person possessives favor the reanalysis of the morpheme ‘-s’ as indicating the number associated with person features.Downloads
References
Augusto M, Ferrari Neto J, Corrêa L. Explorando o DP: a presença de NumP. Revista de Estudos da Lingugem, 2006;14(2):245-275.
Blühdorn H et al. Sintagmas nominais contáveis e não-contáveis no alemão e no português brasileiro. In: Battaglia MH, Nomura M, editors. Estudos linguísticos contrastivos em alemão e português. São Paulo: Annablume; 2008. p. 41-82.
Brito AM. European Portuguese possessives and the structure of DP. Cuadernos de Lingüística del I.U.I. Ortega y Gasset, 2007;14:27-50.
Castro A. Os possessivos em português europeu e português brasileiro: unidade e diversidade. XVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; 2001; Lisboa, Portugal. Lisboa: APL; 2001: p. 599-613.
Castro A, Pratas F. Capeverdean DP-internal number agreement: additional arguments for a distributed morphology approach. In: Costa J, Figueiredo Silva M, editors. Studies on agreement. Amsterdam: Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 2006. p. 11-24.
Cerqueira V. A forma genitiva ‘dele’ e a categoria de concordância (AGR) no português brasileiro. In: Roberts I, Kato M. Português brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica. Campinas: UNICAMP; 1993. p. 129-161.
Chomsky N. Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz M, editor. Ken Hale: a life in language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press; 2001. p. 1-52.
Cinque G. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 2005;36(3):315-332.
Costa J, Figueiredo Silva M. Nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese: an argument for distributed morphology. In: Costa J, Figueiredo Silva M, editors. Studies on agreement. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 2006. p. 25-46.
Danon G. Agreement and DP-Internal Feature Distribution. Syntax, 2011;14(4):297-317.
Giusti G. The categorial status of quantified nominals. Linguistische Berichte: Forschung, Information, Diskussion. Opladen, 1991:438-454.
Kato M. A complementaridade dos possessivos e das construções genitivas no português coloquial: réplica a Perini. DELTA, 1985;1(1) e (2):107-120.
Maynor N. Battle of the pronouns: Y’all versus you-guys. American Speech, 2000;75(4):416-418.
Müller A. A gramática das formas possessivas no português do Brasil. [Tese]. Campinas: Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, UNICAMP; 1997.
Neves MH. O pronome possessivo. In: Neves MH. Gramática de usos do português. São Paulo: UNESP; 2000. p. 471 – 489.
Norris M. A theory of nominal concord. [PhD Dissertation]. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz; 2014.
Pereira BK. O possessivo de 2aPL no dialeto mineiro: DP e CP em análise. Linguistic Studies 11: Contemporary approaches to Portuguese Linguistics: interfaces, variation and innovation. Lisboa: Colibri/CLUNL; 2015. (In press).
Pereira BK. Second person possessives and allocutive agreement. In: Pilati E, organizador. Essays in generative grammar: tribute to Lucia Lobato. Brasília: UnB; 2016a. p. 71-83.
Pereira BK. The DP-internal distribution of the plural morpheme in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics; 2016b. (In press).
Perini M. O surgimento do sistema de possessivo coloquial: uma interpretação funcional. DELTA, 1985;1(1) e (2):1-16.
Pesetsky D, Torrego E. The syntax of valuation and interpretability of features. In: Karimi S et al., editors. Phrasal and clausal architecture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2007. p. 262-294.
Silva G. Estertores da forma ‘seu’ na língua oral. In: Silva G, Scherre M, editors. Padrões sociolinguísticos: análise de fenômenos variáveis do português falado na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro; 1996. p. 170-181.
Zribi-Herts A. Les syntagmes nominaux possessifs en français moderne: syntaxe et morphologie. In: Guéron J, Zribi-Herts A, editors. La grammaire de la possession. Paris: Université Paris X – Nanterre; 1998. p. 129-166.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is transferred to the journal for the online publication, with free access, and for the printing in paper documents. Copyright may be preserved for authors who wish to republish their work in collections.
