Urban Utopias Insights from a Decolonial Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2022.189578

Keywords:

Urban utopias, Urban natural, Decolonial turn, Lefebvre, Daily life

Abstract

Let us rehearse here a theoretical exercise of reflection on urban utopias, a natural urban, that point to alternative society-nature relations and to equitable societal utopian projects empowering social solidarity, other social relations of production, other ways of producing social (and differential) space, and other forms of everyday life capable of confronting capitalist accumulation. From a contemporary Latin American perspective, it would be unfeasible to approach urban utopias and even possible expressions of the natural urban if not from a critical perspective concerning coloniality. Therefore, such a task involves a number of steps. The first concerns utopia, urban utopias and nature. The second involves the demystification of Western modernity and other conceptions of the society-nature relationship, based on the decolonial turn. And the third, founded on Quijano, Walsh and Lefebvre, seeks highlighting the transformative role of everyday life along with alternative ways of producing material life and social existence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ester Limonad, Fluminense Federal University

    Full Professor of the Graduate Program in Geography and the Department of Geography of the Universidade Federal Fluminense. Coordinator of GECEL (City, Space and Place Research Group).

  • Roberto Luís Monte-Mór, Federal University of Minas Gerais

    PhD Professor of the Graduate Programs in Economics at the Center for Regional Development and Planning (CEDEPLAR) and in Architecture and Urbanism at the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Coordinator of GEHL (Henri Lefebvre Study Group)

References

ACOSTA, A. O Bem Viver: uma oportunidade para imaginar outros mundos. São Paulo: Elefante, 2016.

ALCANTARA, L.C.S.; SAMPAIO, C.A.C. Bem Viver como paradigma de desenvolvimento: utopia ou alternativa possível Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente (UFPR), v. 40, p. 231-251, 2017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma.v40i0.48566.

ALIMONDA, H. The Coloniality of Nature: An Approach to Latin American Political Ecology. Alternautas (Re)Searching Development: The Abya Yala Chapter, v. 6, n.2, 2019. http://www.alternautas.net/blog/2019/6/10/the-coloniality-of-nature-an-approach-to-latin-american-political-ecology.

AMARO, R.R. Desenvolvimento ou Pós-Desenvolvimento? Des-Envolvimento e... Noflay!. Cadernos de Estudos Africanos, v. 34, p. 75-111, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/cea.2335.

BALLESTRIN, L. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política. n.11, p. 89-117, maio - agosto 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-33522013000200004.

BLOCH, E. El principio esperanza. Madrid: Trotta, 2004.

BRENNER, N. State Theory in the Political Conjuncture: Henri Lefebvre’s “Comments on a New State Form”. Antipode, v. 33, n.5, p. 783-808, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00217.

BUSQUET, G. L’espace politique chez Henri Lefebvre: l’idéologie et l’utopie [“Political Space in the Work of Henri Lefebvre: Ideology and Utopia”, justice spatiale | spatial justice, 5, 2012|2013. https://www.jssj.org/article/lespace-politique-chez-henri-lefebvre-lideologie-et-lutopie/

CORAGGIO, J. L. Economia Urbana: la perspectiva popular. Quito: Instituto Fronesis, 1994.

CORAGGIO, J. L. La economía social y la búsqueda de un programa socialista para el siglo XXI. Revista Foro, n. 62, p. 37-64, 2007.

CORAGGIO, J. L. Potenciar la Economía Popular Solidaria: una respuesta al neoliberalismo. Otra Economía, v.11, n. 20, p. 4-18., 2018.

DESFOR, G.; KEIL, R. Nature and the City: Making Environmental Policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2004.

DIEGUES, A. C. O Mito Moderno da Natureza Intocada. São Paulo: Melhoramentos, 2008.

ESCOBAR, A. Encountering Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

ESCOBAR, A. Mundos y conocimientos de otro modo. Tabula Rasa. Bogotá, n.1, p. 51-86, ene-dic, 2003. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/396/39600104.pdf

ESCOBAR, A. The making and unmaking of the third world through development. In RAHNEMA, M.; BAWTREE, V. (ed.) The Post-Development Reader, Zed Books, 1997. pp. 85-93.

FANON, F. (1968) Os condenados da Terra. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

GRAMSCI, A. Pre-prison writings. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

GRAMSCI, A. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers, 1971.

GROSFOGUEL, R. Para descolonizar os estudos de economia política e os estudos pós-coloniais: Transmodernidade, pensamento de fronteira e colonialidade global. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 80, p. 115-147, março 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.697

HABERMAS, J. The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

HELLER, A.; FEHÉR, F. Anatomía de la Izquierda Occidental. Barcelona: Península, 1985.

HEYNEN, N.; KAIKA, M.; SWYNGEDOUW, E. (eds) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. New York: Routledge 2006.

IANNI, O. A Sociologia e o mundo moderno. Tempo Social, 1, n. 1, p. 7-27, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1590/ts.v1i1.83315.

KAIKA, M. City of flows: modernity, nature, and the city. New York: Routledge, 2005.

KAIKA, M.; SWYNGEDOUW, E. Radical urban political-ecological imaginaries. Planetary urbanization and politicizing nature. Eurozine, 2014, https://www.eurozine.com/radical-urban-politicalecological-imaginaries/KEIL, R. et al. (Eds) Political Ecology: Global and Local. London: Routledge, 1998.

KEIL, R.; GRAHAM, J. (1998) Reasserting nature: Constructing urban environments after Fordism. In: BRAUN, B.; CASTREE, N. (Eds) Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium. London: Routledge, 1998. p. 100–125.

KEYES, C.L. The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, v. 43, n. 2, p. 207-222, 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197

LACOSTE, Y. A Geografia isso serve, em primeiro lugar, para fazer a guerra. Campinas: Papirus, 1988.

LEFEBVRE, H. A vida cotidiana no mundo moderno. São Paulo: Ática, 1991a.

LEFEBVRE, H. Comments on a new state form. Antipode, v. 33, n. 5, p. 769–782, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00216

LEFEBVRE, H. De L’État. v. 4. Paris: Union Générale des éditions, 1978.

LEFEBVRE, H. Espacio y Política. Barcelona: Península, 1974.

LEFEBVRE, H. O Direito à Cidade. São Paulo: Documentos, 1969.

LEFEBVRE, H. State, Space, World. Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.

LEFEBVRE, H. The Production of Space. London: Blackwell, 1991b.

LEFEBVRE, H. The Survival of Capitalism: Reproduction of the Relations of Production. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1976.

LEFF, E. Discursos Sustentables. México: Siglo XXI, 2008.

LIMONAD, E. (2004) Questões ambientais contemporâneas, uma contribuição ao debate. In Anais II Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Ambiente e Sociedade. Campinas. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303895885_Questoes_ambientais_contemporaneas_uma_contribuicao_ao_debate

LIMONAD, E. Para pensar a descolonização do cotidiano: desentranhando o desenvolvimento. In LIMONAD, E.; BARBOSA, J.L. (Org.). Geografias: Reflexões, Estudos e Leituras. São Paulo: Max Limonad, 2020. pp. 20-40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353889825_2020_PARA_PENSAR_A_DESCOLONIZACAO_DO_COTIDIANO.

LIMONAD, E. Utopias urbanas, sonhos ou pesadelos? Cortando as cabeças da Hidra de Lerna. In BENACH, N., ZAAR, M.H., VASCONCELOS P. JR, M. (Eds.). Las utopías y la construcción de la sociedad del futuro. Universidad de Barcelona, 2016. http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/xiv-coloquio/EsterLimonad.pdf

LIMONAD, E.; MONTE-MÓR, R.L. O rural e o urbano em uma era de urbanização generalizada. In: MAIA, D. S.; RODRIGUES, A. M.; SILVA, W. R. (Org.). Expansão urbana: despossessão, conflitos, diversidade na produção e consumo do espaço. João Pessoa: Editora UFPB, 2020. p. 222-253. http://www.editora.ufpb.br/sistema/press5/index.php/UFPB/catalog/view/779/850/7571-1

LUXEMBURGO, R. A Acumulação do Capital. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1985.

MIGNOLO, W. Diferencia colonial y razón posoccidental. In CASTRO-GÓMES, S. (ed.) Reestructuración de las ciencias sociales en América Latina. Bogotá: Centro Editorial Javeriano, 2000. pp. 3-28.

MONTE-MÓR, R. L. O que é o urbano, no mundo contemporâneo. Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento. Curitiba, n.111, p.09-18, jul./dez. 2006. http://www.ipardes.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistaparanaense/article/view/58.

MONTE-MÓR, R. L. Urbanização extensiva e lógicas de povoamento. In: LIMONAD, E. (Org.). Etc espaço, tempo e crítica... Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital, 2019. pp. 251-262. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339237450_ETC_-_Espaco_Tempo_e_Critica

MONTE-MÓR, R. L. Urbanization, sustainability, development: contemporary complexities and diversities in the production of urban space. In HORN, P., ALFARO, P., CARDOSO, A.C. (Ed.) Emerging Urban Spaces. A Planetary Perspective. Springer eBook. pp.201-215, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57816-3_10

MONTE-MÓR, R. L.; RAY, S. Post-*.ism & the Third World: a theoretical reassessment and fragments from Brazil and India. Nova Economia, 5, n. 1, p. 177-208, 1995.

POLANYI, K. Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.

QUIJANO, A. Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. In Quijano, A. Cuestiones y Horizontes. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014. pp. 285 – 326. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20140424014720/Cuestionesyhorizontes.pdf

QUIJANO, A. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South (Duke University), v.1, n. 3. p. 533-580, 2000. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/nep/summary/v001/1.3quijano.html

RANDOLPH, R. A origem estrutural da subversão em sociedades capitalistas contemporâneas, suas práticas baseadas na vivência cotidiana e um novo paradigma de um contra planejamento. In COSTA, G.M., COSTA, H.S.M., MONTE-MÓR, R.L (Ed.) Teorias e Práticas Urbanas: condições para a sociedade urbana. Belo Horizonte: C/Arte, 2015. pp. 71-102.

RANDOLPH, R. A utopia do planejamento e o planejamento da utopia: o longo caminho de uma contra-planejamento até o alcance da justiça social. In BENACH, N., ZAAR, M.H., VASCONCELOS P. JR, M. (Eds.). Las utopías y la construcción de la sociedad del futuro. Universidad de Barcelona, 2016. http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/xiv-coloquio/RainerRandolph.pdf

RIBEIRO, A.C.T. Sociabilidade, Hoje: leitura da experiência urbana. Cadernos CRH, v.18, n. 45, p. 411-422, 2005.

https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/18535.

SÁNCHEZ, J. E. Espacio, Economia y Sociedad. Barcelona. Siglo XXI, 1990.

SANTOS, M. A Natureza do Espaço. São Paulo: Loyola, 1996.

SILVA-RODRÍGUEZ, E.A. et al. Urban wildlife in times of COVID-19: What can we infer from novel carnivore records in urban areas?, Science of The Total Environment. v. 765, 142713, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142713.

SILVA, H. (2017) Socialização da natureza e alternativas de desenvolvimento na Amazônia Brasileira. Tese (Doutorado em Economia) – CEDEPLAR, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/FACE-AP8RH2.

SOJA, E. W. Postmetropolis: critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell, 2000.

SPARN, J. O. W. (Re)Imagining sustainable futures - A discussion between Degrowth and Buen Vivir. Tese (Doutorado em Economia) – CEDEPLAR, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/31739.

SWYNGEDOUW, E. The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, v.7, n. 2, p. 65–80, 1996.

TZANINIS, Y. et al. Moving urban political ecology beyond the ‘urbanization of nature’. Progress in Human Geography, v. 45, n.2, p. 229–252, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0309132520903350.

UN (United Nations) Happiness: towards a holistic approach to development: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly. UN. General Assembly (65th sess.: 2010-2011), 2011.

WACHSMUTH, D; ANGELO, H. Green and Gray: New Ideologies of Nature in Urban Sustainability Policy. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1417819.

WALSH, C. (Re)pensamiento crítico y (De)colonialidad. In: Walsh, C. (Ed.). Pensamiento critico y matriz (de)colonial. Reflexiones latinoamericanas. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - Ediciones Abya-Yala, 2005a. p. 13-35.

WALSH, C. Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development, v.53, n.1, p. 15-21, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev. 2009.93.

WALSH, C. Interculturalidad, conocimientos y decolonialidad. Signo y Pensamiento, v. 24, n. 46, p. 39-50, 2005b. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/860/86012245004.pdf

ZELLMER, A. J. et al. What can we learn from wildlife sightings during the COVID-19 global shutdown? Ecosphere, v. 11, n. 8:e03215, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3215.

Published

2022-04-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LIMONAD, Ester; MONTE-MÓR, Roberto Luís. Urban Utopias Insights from a Decolonial Perspective. GEOUSP Espaço e Tempo (Online), São Paulo, Brasil, v. 26, n. 1, p. e-189578, 2022. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2022.189578. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/geousp/article/view/189578.. Acesso em: 20 may. 2024.