Does capital structure influence the performance of corporate social responsibility? An analysis in companies of the world's largest economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2021.174007Keywords:
Corporate social responsibility, Capital structure, Debt, Equity, GDPAbstract
Companies are under external and internal pressure to adopt Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices. Positive and significant results of the relationship between CSR and financial performance are not always confirmed in empirical studies, demonstrating, thus, no consensus has been achieved in CSR literature yet. Thereby, we seek to understand the influence of capital structure on the performance of CSR practices, since there is a theoretical omission about intangible attributes. We formulated three hypotheses about the relationship between CSR and: the capital structure (H1); the debt financing (H1a); and the shareholder’s equity (H1b). We used a sample of 1,642 publicly traded companies on the 10 highest GDP countries. Using GMM 2SLS estimator, the results reveal positive and significant relationship between shareholders’ equity and CSR, while for the relationship between debt financing and CSR shown a negative and significative correlation. Our findings suggest that companies with higher scores of CSR tend to finance itself through equity. We found differences between countries related to the Capital Structure volume required to achieve a CSR positive index. Our findings provoke further debate concerning the reasons that conduct organizations to adopt such practices and foster new discussions about the aspects that involve social practices responsible adoption in companies.
Downloads
References
Al-Dah, B., Dah, M., & Jizi, M. (2018). Is CSR reporting always favorable? Management Decision, 56(7), 1506-1525. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0540
Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00923906/
Almeida, M. A., & Santos, J. F. (2016). Capital structure and voluntary disclosure of information on corporate social responsibility in Brazilian companies. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 109-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n45p109
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027-1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
Baraibar-Diez, E., & Sotorrío, L. L. (2018). O efeito mediador da transparência na relação entre responsabilidade social corporativa e reputação corporativa. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 20(1), 05-21. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v20i1.3600
Barnett, M.L., 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 794–816. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275520
Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., & Naranjo, A. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.008
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Cantino, V., Devalle, A., & Fiandrino, S. (2017). ESG Sustainability and Financial Capital Structure: Where they Stand Nowadays. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8(5), 116-126. http://hdl.handle.net/2318/1650869
Carroll, A. B. (2008). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. In Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press,19-46.
Chen, Y. C., Hung, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009
Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer Jr, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005
Choi, J. S. (1999). An investigation of the initial voluntary environmental disclosures made in Korean semi-annual financial reports. Pacific Accounting Review, 11(1).
Chung, K. H., Elder, J., & Kim, J. C. (2010). Corporate governance and liquidity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2), 265-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109010000104
Ferris, S. P., Javakhadze, D., & Rajkovic, T. (2017). The international effect of managerial social capital on the cost of equity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 74, 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.10.001
Garcia A.S., Mendes-Da-Silva W., Orsato R.J. (2019) Corporate Sustainability, Capital Markets, and ESG Performance. In: Mendes-Da-Silva W. (eds) Individual Behaviors and Technologies for Financial Innovations (pp. 287-309). Springer, Cham.
Hamrouni, A., Boussaada, R., & Ben Farhat Toumi, N. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and debt financing. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(4), 394-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2018-0020
IMF (2019) – International Monetary Funds. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Ketokivi, M., & McIntosh, C. N. (2017). Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: Theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Operations Management, 52, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5%3C603::AID-SMJ101%3E3.0.CO;2-3
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of management studies, 43(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019
Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
Teixeira, E. A., Nossa, V., & Funchal, B. (2011). O índice de sustentabilidade empresarial (ISE) e os impactos no endividamento e na percepção de risco. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 22(55), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772011000100003
Thomson & Reuters (2019). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores from Refinitiv. Available at: https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/esg-scores-methodology.pdf
Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607-1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
Yang, S., He, F., Zhu, Q., & Li, S. (2018). How does corporate social responsibility change capital structure? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 25(3-4), 352-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2017.1354710
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
