Precisamos escrever diferente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2022.191894Downloads
References
Badley, G. F. (2015). Playful and serious adventures in academic writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(8), 711–719.
Badley, G. F. (2016). Composing academic identities: Stories that matter?. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 377-385.
Badley, G. F. (2019). Post-academic writing: Human writing for human readers. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(2), 180-191.
Badley, GF (2020). Why and how academics write. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 247-256.
Baldvinsdottir, G., Mitchell, F., & Nørreklit, H. (2010). Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 79-82.
Billig, M. (2013). Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
de Villiers, C., & Dumay, J. (2014). Writing an article for a refereed accounting journal. Pacific Accounting Review, 26(3), 324-350.
Dillard, J., & Vinnari, E. (2017). A case study of critique: Critical perspectives on critical accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 88-109.
Hermanson, D. R. (2015). “Model 2”—A personal journey in pursuit of creativity and impact. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 130-140.
Marinetto, M. (2018). Fast food research in the era of unplanned obsolescence. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 1014-1020.
Murakami, H. (2010). Do que eu falo quando falo de corrida. Rio de Janeiro: Alfaguara Brasil.
Murray, D. M. (1969). Finding your own voice: Teaching composition in an age of dissent. College Composition and Communication, 20(2), 118-123.
Murray, D. M. (1978). Write before writing. College Composition and Communication, 29(4), 375-381.
Murray, D. M. (1982). Teaching the other self: The writer's first reader. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 140-147.
Murray, D. M. (1984). Writing and teaching for surprise. College English, 46(1), 1-7.
Murray, D. M. (1986). One writer's secrets. College composition and communication, 37(2), 146-153.
Murray, D.M. (2013) The craft of revision, Fifth Anniversary Edition. United States: Wadsworth. Cengage Learning, 2013.
Murray, D. M. (2013) The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts. In: Language Awareness: Readings for College Writers. Ed. Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2013. 194–98. (Originally published in Writer, 1973).
Patriotta, G. (2017). Crafting Papers for Publication: Novelty and Convention in Academic Writing. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 747-759.
Silvia, P. J. (2019). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing, 2nd Ed. American Psychological Association.
Sword, H. (2009). Writing higher education differently: A manifesto on style. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 319-336.
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press.
Sword, H. (2017). Air & light & time & space: How successful academics write. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zinsser, W. (2006). On writing well. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Sanches Pagliarussi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.




