Perspectives on the use of public financial information by politicians: recent findings and future challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2024.227514Downloads
References
Askim, J. (2007). How Do Politicians Use Performance Information? An Analysis of the Norwegian Local Government Experience’. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 453-472. DOI: 10.1177/0020852313518170
Askim, J., & Baldersheim, H. (2012). Policy Learning in Local Government: The Role of Reflexive Leadership. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration: A Journal for Theory and Practice of Public Administration, 12(2), 319-338. https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php/131947
Bergmann, A. (2022). Editorial: Use of Accounting Information by Politicians. Public Money & Management, 42(8), 573. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2126625
Birnberg, J., Turopolec, L., & Young, S. (1983). The Organizational Context of Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2), 111–129. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(83)90018-1
Budding, T., & van Helden, J. (2022). Theme: Politicians’ Use of Accounting Information. Editorial: Unraveling Politicians’ Use and Non-Use of Accounting Information. Public Money & Management, 42(3), 137–139. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2028467
Buylen, B., & Christiaens, J. (2016). Talking Numbers? Analyzing the Presence of Financial Information in Councillors’ Speech During the Budget Debate in Flemish Municipal Councils. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 453-475. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2015.1064502
Caruana, J., & Farrugia, B. (2018). The Use and Non-Use of the Government Financial Report by Maltese Members of Parliament. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(4), 1124-1144. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2350
Carvalho, J., Gomes, P., & Fernandes, M. (2012). The Main Determinants in the Use of the Cost Accounting System in Portuguese Local Governments. Financial Accountability and Management, 28 (4), 60-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00547.x
Christiaens, J., Reyniers, B., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems: a comparative study. Internacional Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3): 537-554. DOI: 10.1177/0020852310372449
Cohen, S. (2022). Debate: Accounting Training for Politicians – An Alternative Approach. Public Money & Management, 42(8), 576-577. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2107826
Christensen, M. (2022). Debate: Accounting information performativity and politicians’ use (or not). Public Money & Management, 42(8), 574-575.
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The Concept of Information Overload: a Review of Literature From Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. The Information Society. An International Journal, 20(5), 325-244. DOI: 10.1080/01972240490507974
Ezzamel, M., Hyndman, N., Johnsen, A., Lapsely, I., & Pallot, J. (2005). Conflict and Rationality: Accounting in Northern Ireland's Devolved Assembly. Financial Accountability and Management, 21(1), 33-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2005.00208.x
Faber, A., & Budding, G. (2022). Roles and User Characteristics as Driving Forces of Information Use in the Dutch Parliament”. Public Money & Management, 42(3), 160-168. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1967634
Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics and Society, 41, 2, pp. 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213483107
Giacomini, D. (2020). Use of Accounting Information by Mayors in Local Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 341-349. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1636392
Giacomini, D., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Contextualizing politicians’ uses of accounting information: accounting as reassuring and ammunition machine. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 483-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1237128
Gómez-Villegas, M., Brusca, I., & Bergmann, A. (2020). IPSAS in Latin America: innovation, isomorphism or rhetoric? Public Money & Management, 40(7), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1769374
Guarini, E. (2016). The Day After Newly-Elected Politicians and the Use of Accounting Information. Public Money and Management, 36(7), 499-506. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1237135
Haustein, E., Lorson, P. O., & Sinervo, L. (2021). Perceived Usability of Local Government Financial Statements by Local Councilors: Comparative Study of Finland and Germany. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(4), 441-458. DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-09-2020-0227
Heald, D. (2003). Fiscal Transparency: Concepts, Measurement and UK Practice. Public Administration, 81(4), 723-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00369.x
IPSASB. (2014). Conceptual Framework for General Purpose Financial Reporting by Public Sector Entities. IFAC.
Jethon, A., & Reichard, C. (2022). Usability and actual use of performance information in German municipal budgets: The perspective of local politicians. Public Money & Management, 42(3), 152-159.
Jorge, S., Jesus, M., & Nogueira, S. (2016a). Do Politicians at Central Level Use Accounting Information? Some Evidence from the Portuguese Case. AECA, 115, 35-39.
Jorge, S., Jesus, M., & Nogueira, S. (2016b). Information Brokers and the Use of Budgetary and Financial Information by Politicians: the Case of Portugal. Public Money and Management, 36(7), 515-520. doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1237152
Jorge, S., Jesus, M., & Nogueira, S. (2019). The Use of Budgetary and Financial Information by Politicians in Parliament: A Case Study. Journal of Public Budgeting. Accounting and Financial Management, 31(4), 539–557. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2018-0135
Jorge, S., Nogueira, S., & Jesus, M. (2023). Financial Information Use in Parliamentary Debates in a Changing Context. Public Organization Review, 1-28. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-023-00709-1
Kroll, A. (2022). Debate: Expanding Research on Politicians Data Use. Public Money & Management, 42(8), 578-579. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2103316
Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2018). The Power of Language in Legitimating Public-Sector Reforms: When Politicians “Talk” Accounting. British Accounting Review, 50(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.006
Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some Like it Non-Financial…: Politicians’ and Managers’ Views on the Importance of Performance Information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2011.650054
Mann B., Lorson, P., Oulasvirta, L., & Haustein, E. (2019). The quest for a primary EPSAS purpose – Insights from literature and conceptuais frameworks. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 195-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1632467
Moynihan, D. & Pandey, S. (2010). The Big questions for Performance Management: Why do Managers Use Performance Information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(24), 849-866. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muq004
Nogueira, S., Jorge, S., & Batista, W. (2023). Research Map About the Use of Public Sector Financial and Non-Financial Information by Politicians. Paper to be presented at the 19th CIGAR Biennial Conference Tokyo (Japan), June 29th-30th.
Poljašević, J., Vašiček, V., & Dragija Kostić, M. (2021). Public managers’ perception of the usefulness of accounting information in decision-making processes. Public Money & Management, 41(6), 456–465. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1906534
Polzer, T., Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2022). Implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards in Europe: Variations on a Global Theme. Accounting Forum, 46(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1920277
Raudla, R. (2021). Politicians’ Use of Performance Information in the Budget Process. Public Money & Management, 42(3), 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1989779
Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2014). The Discretionary Use of Performance Information by Different Local Government Actors – Analysing and Comparing the Predictive Power of Three Factor Sets. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 637-658. DOI: 10.1177/0020852313518170
Saliterer, I., Korac, S., Moser, B., & Rondo-Brovetto, P. (2019). How Politicians Use Performance Information in a Budgetary Context: New Insights From the Central Government Level. Public Administration, 97(4): 829-844. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12604
Sedmihradská, L. & Kučera, J. (2020). Actors and the Information Flows in the Czech Parliamentary Budget Debate. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(3), 321-338. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0122
Sinervo, L., & Haapala, P. (2019). Presence of Financial Information in Local Politicians' Speech. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 558-577. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2018-0133
ter Bogt, H. (2014). Politicians in Search of Performance Information? Survey Research on Dutch Aldermen's Use of Performance Information. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 221-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00387.x
van Helden, J. (2016). Literature Review and Challenging Research Agenda on Politicians' Use of Accounting Information. Public Money and Management, 36(7), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1237162
van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2019). Making Sense of the Users of Public Sector Accounting Information and their Needs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 478-495, DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0124
van Helden, J., Caperchione, E. & Pattaro, A. F. (2023). Use and Non-use of Accounting Information: The Case of Controversial Projects in Public and Non-Profit Settings. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 90, 1-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102378
Windels, P., & Christiaens, J. (2006). Management Reform in Flemish Public Centres for Social Welfare: Examining Organisational Change. Local Government Studies, 32(4),89-411. DOI: 10.1080/03003930600792864
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sónia Paula da Silva Nogueira, Susana Margarida Jorge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
