Relationship of key audit matters and audit delay with financial restatement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2024.227391Keywords:
Key audit matters, Audit delay, Financial statement restatements, Audit qualityAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between key audit matters (KAM), audit report lag (audit delay), and financial restatements. It hypothesizes that longer audit delays reduce financial information quality, impair the auditor's work, and increase the likelihood of restatements. Additionally, it explores whether firms disclosing KAM exhibit higher audit quality and a lower probability of restating financial statements. The analysis draws on data from 323 non-financial firms listed on Brazil’s Stock Exchange (B3) between 2010 and 2020, employing descriptive statistics, mean proportion difference tests, and panel regression models. The results show that companies with longer audit delays are more likely to restate their financial statements. Conversely, greater KAM disclosure reduces this likelihood. Moreover, the number of KAM moderates the relationship between audit delay and the likelihood of restatement. These findings provide valuable insights for auditors, regulators, investors, and governance committee members, especially in assessing business risks. The study also shows that KAM reporting by auditors is associated with a decrease in restatement events, thus providing relevant insights for auditing practices and accounting regulation.
Downloads
References
Abdullatif, M., & Al‐Rahahleh, A. S. (2020). Applying a new audit regulation: reporting key audit matters in Jordan. International Journal of Auditing, 24(2), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12192
Abdullatif, M., Alzebdieh, R., & Ballour, S. (2023). The effect of key audit matters on the audit report lag: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2022-0245
Afify, H. (2009). Determinants of audit reporting lag: does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675420910963397
Alves Júnior, E. D., & Galdi, F. C. (2020). The informational relevance of key audit matters. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 31(82), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201908910
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Zhang, Y. (2015). The economic consequences of financial restatements: evidence from the market for corporate control. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50869
Asbahr, K., & Ruhnke, K. (2019). Real effects of reporting key audit matters on auditors’ judgment and choice of action. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12154
Baatwah, S. R., Almoataz, E. S., Omer, W. K., & Aljaaidi, K. S. (2024). Does KAM disclosure make a difference in emerging markets? An investigation into audit fees and report lag. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(3), 798–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2021-1606
Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data (Third). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bédard, J., Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2019). Consequences of expanded audit reports: evidence from the justifications of assessments in France. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(3), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52339
Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., & MacGregor, J. E. (2014). The relationship between audit report lags and future restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(2), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50667
Brandão, C. V., Marques, V. A., Ballarini, L. M., & Pain, P. (2024). Reflexos das reapresentações de demonstrações financeiras de empresas listadas nos contratos de auditoria e remuneração dos auditores. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 18(1). https://www.repec.org.br/repec/article/view/3293
Bryant-Kutcher, L., Peng, E. Y., & Weber, D. P. (2013). Regulating the timing of disclosure: insights from the acceleration of 10-K filing deadlines. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(6), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.08.003
Chan, K. H., Luo, V. W., & Mo, P. L. L. (2016). Determinants and implications of long audit reporting lags: evidence from China. Accounting and Business Research, 46(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1039475
Chiudini, V., Cunha, P. R., & Marques, L. (2018). Relação entre a republicação das demonstrações contábeis e o audit delay. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil, 17(51). https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v17n51.2617
Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., & Wolfe, C. J. (2014). Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50793
Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., Omer, T. C., & Shelley, M. K. (2016). Understanding audit quality: insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), Artigo 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212
Cordo, G. S., & Fulop, M. T. (2015). Understanding audit reporting changes: introduction of key audit matters. Accounting & Management Information Systems, 14(1), 128–152.
Durand, G. (2019). The determinants of audit report lag: A meta-analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 44–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2017-1572
Ettredge, M., Scholz, S., Smith, K. R., & Sun, L. (2010). How do restatements begin? Evidence of earnings management preceding restated financial reports: how do restatements begin? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37(3–4), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02199.x
Fávero, L. P., Belfiore, P., & Souza, R. F. (2022). Data Science, analytics and machine learnings with R. (Fisrt edition). London, Elsevier.
Ferreira, C., & Morais, A. I. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between company characteristics and key audit matters disclosed. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 31(83), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201909040
Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006
Gold, A., Heilmann, M., Pott, C., & Rematzki J. (2020). Do key audit matters impact financial reporting behavior? International Journal of Auditing, 24, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12190
Habib, A., Bhuiyan, Md. B. U., Huang, H. J., & Miah, M. S. (2019). Determinants of audit report lag: a meta‐analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12136
Hegazy, M. A. A., & Kamareldawla, N. M. (2021). Key audit matters: did IAASB unravel the knots of confusion in audit reports decisions? Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(8), 1025–1052. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2019-2464
Kitiwong, W., & Sarapaivanich, N. (2020). Consequences of the implementation of expanded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2019-2410
Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: evidence from pre- and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: a Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10298
Lee, N. L. (Vic)., Khalaf, M. S., Farag, M., & Gomaa, M. (2024). The impact of critical audit matters on audit report lag and audit fees: evidence from the United States. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2023-0158
Marques, V. A., Barcelos, B. A., D., Patrício, P. C., N., Correia da Silva, L. K., & Fernandes, A. H. (2016). Dinâmica das republicações das demonstrações contábeis no período de 1997-2012. Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 19(3), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-3925_2016v19n3a6
Marques, V. A., Pereira, L. N., Aquino, I. F., & Freitag, V. C. (2021). Has it become more readable? Empirical evidence of key matters in independent audit reports. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32(87), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202112990
Meckfessel, M. D., & Sellers, D. (2017). The impact of Big 4 consulting on audit reporting lag and restatements. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(1), 19–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2016-1321
Nguyen, L. A., & Kend, M. (2021). The perceived impact of the KAM reforms on audit reports, audit quality and auditor work practices: stakeholders’ perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-10-2019-2445
Pratoomsuwan, T., & Yolrabil, O. (2020). Key audit matter and auditor liability: evidence from auditor evaluators in Thailand. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2019-0147
Rahaman, M. M., & Bhuiyan, M. B. U. (2024). Audit report lag and key audit matters in Australia. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00251-6
Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S., & Zheng, X. (2021). Measuring audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09570-9
Rautiainen, A., Saastamoinen, J., & Pajunen, K. (2021). Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors’ perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2019-2462
Reid, L. C., Carcello, J. V., Li, C., Neal, T. L., & Francis, J. R. (2019). Impact of auditor report changes on financial reporting quality and audit costs: evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1501–1539. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12486
Schmidt, J., & Wilkins, M. S. (2013). Bringing darkness to light: the influence of auditor quality and audit committee expertise on the timeliness of financial statement restatement disclosures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50307
Segal, M. (2019). Key audit matters: insight from audit experts. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(3), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2018-0355
Sultana, N., H. Singh, J. L. W. M., & Van der Zahn, M. (2015). Audit committee characteristics and audit report lag. International Journal of Auditing, 19(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12033
Suttipun, M. (2021). Impact of key audit matters (KAMs) reporting on audit quality: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(5), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2020-0210
Wooldridge, J. M. (2011). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). The MIT Press.
Zeng, Y., Zhang, J. H., Zhang, J., & Zhang, M. (2021). Key audit matters reports in China: their descriptions and implications of audit quality. Accounting Horizons, 35(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-189
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lauren Dal Bem Venturini, Sarah Dornas Gama , Vagner Antonio Marques
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
