Educational intervention with a booklet on syphilis for women in situations of sexual vulnerability: a quasi-experimental study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.8010.4808Keywords:
Women; Vulnerable Populations; Sexual Vulnerability; Syphilis; Intervention Study; Nursing.Abstract
Objective: to assess riverside women’s knowledge about syphilis before and after a booklet educational intervention. Method: a quasi-experimental, comparative study with a before-and-after design was conducted with 40 riverside women through a discussion group with shared reading of the booklet. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used for data analysis. Results: most women were between 18 and 29 years old, married or in a stable relationship, and had completed elementary school. Most had heard about syphilis from health professionals. They had been tested for syphilis and had previously undergone syphilis treatment. Comparing the pre-test and immediate post-test scores, an increase in knowledge about syphilis was observed. When analyzing the immediate post-test phase with the 7-day post-test, there was no significant difference; that is, the knowledge acquired remained the same after 7 days of the educational intervention. When analyzing the pre-test phase and the 7-day post-test phase, an improvement in knowledge was observed. Conclusion: the educational intervention through a booklet discussion circle with shared reading proved effective in acquiring knowledge about syphilis among riverside women, evidenced by the significant improvement in knowledge in the post-test results.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.