Clinical simulation for the development of communication and teamwork in nursing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7560.4549Keywords:
Simulation Training; Education Interprofessional; Communication; Patient Care Team; Students, Nursing; Nursing EducationAbstract
Objective: to implement a realistic simulation scenario aimed at developing communication and teamwork skills in nursing undergraduates and analyzing its contributions during hospital internships. Method: exploratory study conducted with 27 final-year nursing students from a higher education institution. Data were collected in 2021 using a checklist and a validated scenario centered on communication and teamwork in the hospital setting. Data collection took place in two stages: first, during the execution of the scenario/debriefing in the institution’s skills lab, and later, after the completion of the hospital internship, through semi-structured interviews. The debriefing and interviews discussions were analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. Results: during the debriefing stage, the undergraduate students reflected on their participation in the scenario, the case resolution, and their experiences with communication and teamwork. In the interviews, the students expressed a desire to include additional academic disciplines in the simulated classes and highlighted the benefits of using simulation in hospital practice. Conclusion: the simulation deepened the students’ understanding by fostering critical and reflective thinking on communication and teamwork during their hospital internship, thus highlighting the value of its implementation throughout their university education.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.