Regulatory frameworks for assistive products in Germany, Australia, Brazil, Canada, United States, and Japan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v32i4a245835

Keywords:

Persons with Disabilities, Self-Help Devices, Safety, Efficacy

Abstract

The Global Report on Assistive Technology, jointly published by WHO and UNICEF, identified a gap regarding regulations for assistive products worldwide. However, it is noteworthy that understanding which countries have some regulation on the safety of assistive products, on the qualification of suppliers of these products, and on the provision of related services is essential for better contextualization for the Brazilian reality. Objective: To survey the regulatory framework adopted by the agencies of six countries selected by the Expert Committee for the selected priority assistive products. Method: Manual searches were conducted on regulatory agencies and health authorities regarding current regulatory standards of six countries chosen by the Steering Committee, namely: Brazil, Australia, Germany, Japan, Canada, and the United States. Subsequently, a research protocol was published for access by stakeholders. Results: The search was carried out in the six countries for information on general and specific regulations of the prioritized products, their health classification, information on registration, good manufacturing and distribution practices, labeling and marketing, surveillance, import and export, investigation, and penalties. All countries presented regulations for all items, but there is a scarcity of specific regulations for the prioritized devices. Conclusion: All countries presented regulatory standards for medical devices; however, there is a scarcity for specific devices. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that, in all countries studied, the regulations are similar to those used in the medical device risk classification system. The technologies studied are considered low-risk class and, therefore, subject only to notification, which may justify the absence of specific standards for these products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Lista de produtos assistivos prioritários [texto na Internet]. Genebra: Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS); c2017 [citado 2024 set 9]. Disponível em: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/31a693f8-9eb0-48a2-ad4a-dd9164075f90/content

World Health Organization (WHO). Assistive technology: key facts [text on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2024 [cited 2024 sept 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology

Global report on assistive technology. Geneva: World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); 2022. [cited 2024 sept 9]. Available from: https://oddh.iscsp.ulisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/9789240049451-eng_1.pdf

Böhm K, Schmid A, Götze R, Landwehr C, Rothgang H. Five types of OECD healthcare systems: empirical results of a deductive classification. Health Policy. 2013;113(3):258-69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.003

World Health Organization (WHO). Health products policy and standards [text on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); c2024 [cited 2024 sept 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-policy-and-standards/assistive-and-medical-technology/medical-devices/nomenclature

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

1.
Bortoli MC de, Araújo BC de, Setti C, Oliveira C de F, Silva LALB da, Toscas FS, et al. Regulatory frameworks for assistive products in Germany, Australia, Brazil, Canada, United States, and Japan. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 31 [cited 2026 Oct. 9];32(4):238-54. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/245835