Number of cow passages of acidified and antibiotic-free footbathfrom pH analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2025.233143

Keywords:

Acidified footbath, Copper sulfat, Citric acid, Hoof disease prevention, pH stability

Abstract

Footbaths are widely used on dairy farms to prevent and treat hoof diseases, especially digital dermatitis. HoofCare® is a commercial, antibiotic-free product composed of zinc chloride, citric acid, copper citrate, and melaleuca oil, also known as tea tree oil. Empirical field evidence suggests that footbath application yields good results in controlling and preventing foot diseases, as well as when the product is used for direct brushing in treating digital dermatitis lesions. This study aimed to determine the number of cow passages of an acidified commercial solution footbath (HoofCare®) based on pH and compare it with the solution currently most used, 5% copper sulfate. Samples were collected every 50 cow passages, starting from solution preparation to the last cow passage (C0, C50, C100..., C750). Additional samples of the solution preparation and the final HoofCare® footbath were also collected at four different time points: two for the entire lactating herd and two for dry cows and heifers. It is recommended that copper solutions maintain a pH below 5.0, with the ideal cut off point being 4.5. All samples were stored and protected from light for subsequent analysis. Results revealed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) in pH between the copper sulfate and HoofCare® solutions, as determined by the variance test ANOVA. Furthermore, it was evident that at C400 (400 cow passages), the copper sulfate solution had a pH of 4.51, while the HoofCare® solution showed a lower pH of 3.72, only reaching 4.51 at C650 (650 cow passages). The pH variation curve of the HoofCare® solution displayed pH values that remained within the recommended range for an effective footbath (below 5.0) even after 816 cow passages (pH = 4.88). In conclusion, the cutoff point (pH < 4.5) for the 10% HoofCare® footbath was determined to be 600 cow passages. The solution exhibited superior stability and efficacy in maintaining an optimal pH for a greater number of cow passages compared to the 5% copper sulfate solution. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cook NB. Footbath alternatives[Internet]. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2010 [cited 2025 Sep 16]. Available from: https://manitowoc.extension.wisc.edu/files/2010/05/Footbath_Alternatives.pdf.

Cook NB. A review of the design and management of footbaths for dairy cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2017;33(2):195-225. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2017.02.004. PMid:28434607.

Cunha PHJ, Silva LAF, Fioravanti MCS, Borges NC, Moraes RR, SantanaÂP. Avaliação físico-química e microbiológica de diversas soluções desinfetantes de sulfato de cobre a 5% e cloridrato de polihexametileno biguanida a 1% em pedilúvio para bovinos. Ars Vet. 2002;18(2):130-6. http://doi.org/10.4322/rbcv.2015.342.

Gillespie A, Vanhoudt A, Benedictus L, McAloon CG, Logan F, Spaninks M, Viora L. A survey of foot disinfection practices for control of bovine digital dermatitis: evaluating solution depth, footbath hygiene, and the potential of footbaths as infection reservoirs for Treponema species. J Dairy Sci. 2024;107(9):7256-66. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24108. PMid:38825105.

Holzhauer M, BartelsCJ, BergstenC, Van Rıet MMJ, Frankena K, Lam TJGM. The effect of an acidified, ionized copper sulphate solution on digital dermatitis in dairy cows. TVJ. 2012;193(3):659-63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.049. PMid:22867854.

HoschetI. Animal behaviour in relation to footbath designs and footbath management in modern dairy herds in Flanders [dissertation]. Ghent: Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine; 2015. 56 p.

JacobsC, BenıngerC, Hazlewood GS, OrselK, Barkema HW. Effect of footbath protocols for prevention and treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Prev Vet Med. 2019;164:56-71. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.01.011. PMid:30771895.

Manske T, Hultgren J, BergstenC. Topical treatment of digital dermatitis associated with severe heel-horn erosion in a Swedish dairy herd. Prev Vet Med. 2002;53(3):215-31. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00268-9. PMid:11830295.

Mendonça APA, Teodoro PHM, Sılva JRB, Moura RBR, Ravetti R, RodrıguesCA. Effectiveness of HoofCare® in the treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cows.Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2024;76(3):1-12. http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-13006.

Moreira TF, Nicolino RR, Meneses RM, Fonseca GV, Rodrigues LM, Facury EJ Fo, Carvalho AU. Risk factors associated with lameness and hoof lesions in pasturebased dairy cattle systems in southeast Brazil. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(11):10369-78. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16215. PMid:31495614.

Ordaz S, Shepley E, RendahlA, Döper D, Anklam K, Cramer G. Evaluating the efficacy of two footbath concentrates to control digital dermatitis in freestall dairy cows using a non-inferiority study.AABP Proceedings. 2022;55(2):205-6. http://doi.org/10.21423/aabppro20228679.

Papagianni M. Organic acids. In: Moo-Young M, editor. Comprehensive biotechnology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. p. 110-4. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00011-8.

Prastiwi A, Okumuş Z, Hayirli A, Çelebi D, Yanmaz LE, Doğan E, Şenocak MG, Ersoz U. Effectiveness of copper sulfate solutions in footbaths in dairy cattle.Atatürk University J Vet Sci. 2019;14(3):238-45. http://doi.org/10.17094/ataunivbd.538342.

Patelli THC, Godoy O No, Pereira AVO, Porto EP, Rosa VBB, Cunha LFC Fo, Barreto JVP, Souza FAA. Physical and chemical aspects of the footbath from dairy farms with different production systems in Arapoti, Paraná. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2022;74(3):383-9. http://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-12578.

Pirkkalainen H, Döpfer D, Soveri T, Kujala-Wirth M. Comparison of ozonated water and acidified copper sulphate in prevention of digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Acta Vet Scand. 2022;64(1):41-5. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00657-8. PMid:36539792.

Speijers MH, Fınney GA, Mcbrıde J, Watson S, Logue DN, O’Connell NE. Effectiveness of different footbathing frequencies using copper sulfate in the control of digital dermatitis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(6):2955-64. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4683. PMid:22612933.

TeixeiraAGV, Machado VS, Caixeta LS, Pereira RV, Bicalho RC. Efficacy of formalin, copper sulfate, and a commercial footbath product in the control of digital dermatitis.J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(8):3628-34. http://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3246. PMid:20655432.

University of Wisconsin-Madison. Footbath management [Internet]. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2023. (Walking Strong: A Factsheet Series on Dairy Hoof Health) [cited 2025 Jan 22]. Available at: https://dairy.extension.wisc.edu/files/2023/04/footbath-management.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-11-10

Issue

Section

FULL ARTICLE

Funding data

How to Cite

1.
Mendonça APA, Moura RBR, Teodoro PHM, Ravetti R, Robichaud MV, Rodrigues CA. Number of cow passages of acidified and antibiotic-free footbathfrom pH analysis. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 10 [cited 2025 Dec. 28];62:e233143. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/233143