“Maintaining Order and Meaning”: Students’ perceptions and experiences with the research design matrix

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202652294313es

Keywords:

Research instruction, Research design matrix, Research pedagogy

Abstract

Educators face the challenge of teaching research design to students who have no prior experience carrying out projects of this nature. However, the available academic literature on pedagogical perspectives, strategies, and tools for teaching research design is limited. To address this gap, this study explored the use of a research design matrix (RDM), proposed in the literature, as a resource to guide students in their design decisions and ensure coherence among the components of a research project. The analysis involved college students with no prior research experience who used the RDM in two courses to gather their perceptions and evaluations of this resource. Through interviews and qualitative thematic analysis, the findings suggest both favorable and critical perspectives. The matrix is primarily viewed as a tool to maintain consistency in the project and guide the instructor through the various stages of the process. Although some students found the matrix confusing at first and questioned its necessity, future analyses could explore the individual characteristics that influence its acceptance, as well as its transferability and perceived effectiveness across various academic disciplines, in order to improve our understanding of it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CHOGUILL, Charles. The research design matrix: A tool for development planning research studies. Habitat

International, Oxford, v. 29, n. 4, p. 615-626, 2005.

CLEMENTE, Violeta; TSCHIMMEL, Katja; POMBO, Fátima. Matching research questions with a research

methodology: proposal for a didactic resource. The International Journal of Design Education,

Champaign, v. 16, n. 1, p. 155, 2022.

COYNE, Imelda. Sampling in qualitative research: purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear

boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, Oxford, v. 26, n. 3, p. 623-630, 1997.

EARLEY, Mark. A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education,

Abingdon, v. 19, n. 3, p. 242-253, 2014.

ERRANDONEA, Gabriel. Más allá del esquema: la matriz de diseño como herramienta didáctica, sin perder

de vista la epistemología. Integración y Conocimiento: Revista del Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones

en Educación Superior de Mercosur, Córdoba, v. 14, n. 2, p. 200-218, 2025.

GENTLES, Stephen James; CHARLES, Cathy; PLOEG, Jenny; MCKIBBON, Kathleen Ann. Sampling in

qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, Fort

Lauderdale, v. 20, n. 11, p. 1772-1789, 2015.

GRANEHEIM, Ulla Hällgren; LUNDMAN, Berit. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research:

Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, London, v. 24,

n. 2, p. 105-112, 2004.

GUEST, Greg; MACQUEEN, Kathleen; NAMEY, Emily. Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.

HERNÁNDEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, Fernando; SANCHO-GIL, Juana. A learning process within an education

research group: An approach to learning qualitative research methods. International Journal of Social

Research Methodology, Abingdon, v. 18, n. 6, p. 651-667, 2015.

HOIDN, Sabine; OLBERT-BOCK, Sibylle. Learning and teaching research methods in management education:

Development of a curriculum to combine theory and practice - a Swiss case. International Journal of

Educational Management, Bingley, v. 30, n. 1, p. 43-62, 2016.

KANYENGO, Christine Wamunyima. Knowledge production practices in higher institutions of learning

in Zambia: a case of the University of Zambia. 2020. Tesis (Doctoral - PhD en Library and Information

Science) – University of Cape Town, South Africa, 2020.

KAUFMANN, Katja; PEIL, Corinna. The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI): Using WhatsApp to

enhance self-reporting and explore media usage in situ. Mobile Media & Communication, London, v. 8,

n. 2, p. 229-246, 2020.

KELLER, Daniel; KERR, Mary Margaret. Teaching a first-year research experience through archived oral

histories. College Teaching, Philadelphia, v. 70, n. 3, p. 328-336, 2022.

LEWTHWAITE, Sarah; NIND, Melanie. Teaching research methods in the social sciences: Expert perspectives

on pedagogy and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, Abingdon, v. 64, n. 4, p. 413-430, 2016.

MAXWELL, Joseph. A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2012.

MCGINN, Michelle; ROTH, Wolff-Michael. Preparing students for competent scientific practice: implications

of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, Washington, DC, v. 28,

n. 3, p. 14-24, 1999.

MURTONEN, Mari; LEHTINEN, Erno. Conceptions of research and methodology learning. Scandinavian

Journal of Educational Research, Stockholm, v. 49, n. 3, p. 217-224, 2005. https://doi.

org/10.1080/00313830500109519

NIND, Melanie; KATRAMADOU, Angeliki. Lessons for teaching social science research methods in higher

education: synthesis of the literature 2014-2020. British Journal of Educational Studies, Abingdon, v.

71, n. 3, p. 241-266, 2023.

NIND, Melanie; KILBURN, Daniel; LUFF, Rebekah. The teaching and learning of social research methods:

developments in pedagogical knowledge. International Journal of Social Research Methodology,

Abingdon, v. 18, n. 5, p. 455-461, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1062631

ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony; LEECH, Nancy. A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & Quantity,

Dordrecht, v. 41, p. 105-121, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1

ONWUEGBUZIE, Anthony; SLATE, John; SCHWARTZ, Robert. Role of study skills in graduate-level educational

research courses. The Journal of Educational Research, Washington, DC, v. 94, n. 4, p. 238-246, 2001.

PEREIRA, Flávia Holz Meirelles; ARAÚJO, Luciano Vieira. The innovative engagement of external control with

artificial intelligence: evaluation model. RAP: Revista Brasileira de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro,

v. 59, n. 5, 2025.

RANSFORD, Edward; BUTLER, Gerald. Teaching research methods in the social sciences. Teaching

Sociology, Washington, DC, v. 9, n. 3, p. 291-312, 1982.

SALDAÑA, Jhonny. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2021.

STELMA, Juup; FAY, Richard. Intentionality and developing researcher competence on a UK master’s

course: An ecological perspective on research education. Studies in Higher Education, Abingdon, v. 39,

n. 4, p. 517–533, 2014.

SUBRAMANIAM, Karthigeyan. Teaching qualitative research: Concept mapping as an instructional strategy.

College Teaching, Philadelphia, v. 70, n. 1, p. 43-45, 2022.

TITCHEN, Angie; HOBSON, Dawn. Understanding phenomenology through reverse perspectives. In:

SOMEKH, Bridget; LEWIN, Cathy (ed.). Theory and methods in social research. 2. ed. London: Sage,

2011. p. 121-130.

WAGNER, Claire; GARNER, Mark; KAWULICH, Barbara. The state of the art of teaching research methods

in the social sciences: towards a pedagogical culture. Studies in Higher Education, Abingdon, v. 36, n. 1,

p. 75-88, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903452594

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

“Maintaining Order and Meaning”: Students’ perceptions and experiences with the research design matrix. (2026). Educação E Pesquisa, 52(00), e294313. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202652294313es