Innovation Policy in Brazilian Universities: an examination of compliance with the elements proposed by MCTI/Brazil in the country's most innovative institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2237-1095.rgpp.2024.220540Keywords:
Conformidade, Inovação, Marco Legal da Ciência e Tecnologia, Política de inovação, UniversidadeAbstract
The article aims to analyse the compliance of the innovation policies of leading Brazilian universities with the elements recommended by the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications (MCTI/Brazil) for Scientific and Technological Institutions (ICTs). The Orientation Guide for Drawing Up Innovation Policies, published by the MCTI, provides guidelines and recommendations so that ICTs can adapt their internal rules to the Legal Framework for Science, Technology and Innovation. The aim is to assess the level of alignment of university policies in relation to criteria such as the definition of clear guidelines and objectives, the procedures for technology transfer and intellectual property licensing, the participation of public ICTs in the capital of companies, the encouragement of independent inventors, as well as the participation, remuneration, leave and leave of public servants. The analysis revealed that the innovation policies of USP, UNESP, UNICAMP, UFMG and UFRJ vary significantly in their approach to these elements. Some institutions, such as USP, stood out for their more comprehensive approach, establishing clear guidelines and criteria, while others had significant gaps. It was noted that the majority of universities do not specifically address the participation of public ICT in the capital of companies and the encouragement of independent inventors, indicating opportunities for improvement to strengthen their innovation policies.
Downloads
References
Álvarez, Roberto. & Grazzi, Matteo. (2018). Innovation and entrepreneurship in Latin America: What do we know? What would we like to know? Estudios de Economía, 45(2), 157-171. https://estudiosdeeconomia.uchile.cl/index.php/EDE/article/view/51337
ANPEI. Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento das Empresas Inovadoras. (2014). Mapa do Sistema Brasileiro de Inovação. Comitê Interação ICT –Empresa. Comitê de Fomento à Inovação. São Paulo.
Bloom, Nicholas., Van Reenen, John., & Williams, Heidi. (2019). A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.3.163
Brasil. (2004, 2 de dez.). Lei nº 10.973. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
Brasil. (2016, 11 de jan.). Lei nº 13.243. Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília.
Brasil. (2019). Guia de orientação para elaboração da política de inovação nas ICTs/organizadora. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações.
Cavalcante, Pedro., & Cunha, Bruno. (2017). É Preciso Inovar No Governo, Mas Por Quê? Em Inovação no setor público: teoria, tendências e casos no Brasil. ENAP. https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/8785
Cavalcante, Pedro. (2023). Governança da política de inovação no brasil e nos Estados Unidos: uma abordagem comparada. IPEA. Https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/12009
Coccia, Mario. (2019). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society, 59, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007
Etzkowitz, Henry. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information, 52(3), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413485832
Fukuda, Kayano. (2019). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220(c), 107460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033
Kataishi, Rodrigo., & Brixner, Cristian. (2022). Las teorías económicas dominantes sobre ciencia, tecnología e innovación en discusión. Ciencia, Tecnología y Política, 5(8), e074. https://doi.org/10.24215/26183188e074
Kattel, Rainer., & Karo, Erkki. (2016). Start-up governments, or can Bureaucracies innovate? Ineteconomics. https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/start-up-governments-or-can-bureaucracies-innovate
Klein, Simone B., & Pereira, Frederico. (2020). Entrepreneurial university: conceptions and evolution of theoretical models. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 14(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v14i4.43186
Martins, C. B. Universidade empreendedora: um novo paradigma para o ensino superior? Sociedade e Estado, 37 (3), 955-955. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202237030009
Olavarrieta, S., & Villena, M. G. (2014). Innovation and business research in Latin America: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 489-497. https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.005?utm_source=ideas
Spinola, Adriana. (2021). Mecanismos de Transferência de Tecnologia previstos pela Lei de Inovação e sua adoção pelas universidades federais brasileiras. Tese (Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade). Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São carlos. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/handle/ufscar/15617/Tese%20Adriana%20Spinola.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Unger, Maximilian., Ajmone Marsan, Giulia., Meissner, Dirk., Polt, Wolfgang., & Cervantes, Mario. (2018). New challenges for universities in the knowledge triangle. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 806-819. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10961-018-9699-8
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. (2022, 5 mai.). Resolução Nº 05/2022. http://www.ctit.ufmg.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Resolucao-05-2022-Regulamenta-a-Politica-de-Inovacao-UFMG.pdf
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. (2021, 2 de jun.). Resolução CONSUNI Nº 08/2021. https://inovacao.ufrj.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Resolucao-Consuni-08.2021-Politica-de-Inovacao-da-UFRJ.pdf
Universidade Estadual Paulista. (2020, 6 de jul.). Resolução Nº 35/2020. https://sistemas.unesp.br/legislacao-web/?base=R&numero=35&ano=2020&dataDocumento=06/07/2020
Universidade Estadual de Campinas. (2019, 26 de nov.). Deliberação CONSU-A-037/2019. https://multisite.unicamp.br/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2020/06/Deliberacao-CONSU-037.pdf
Universidade de São Paulo. (2021, 3 de dez.). Resolução Nº 8152/2021. https://leginf.usp.br/?resolucao=resolucao-no-8152-de-02-de-dezembro-de-2021#:~:text=RESOLU%C3%87%C3%83O%3A,S%C3%A3o%20Paulo%20e%20da%20Uni%C3%A3o.&text=xiii.%20o%20atendimento%20do%20inventor%20independente.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juliani Karsten Alves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The RG&PP follows the Creative Commons (CC BY) standard, which allows remix, adaptation and creation of works derived from the original, even for commercial purposes. The new works must mention the author(s) in the credits.
The RG&PP uses the software of content similarity check - plagiarism (Crossref Similarity Check) in articles submitted to the journal.
