Experience Shared and Divided: Encyclopedias for Boys and Girls in Former Readers’ Commentary
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.235324Mots-clés :
Teenage nonfiction, Encyclopedias for girls and boys, Reception, Anthropology of reading, Internet ethnographyRésumé
This study explores the reception of Russian-language “encyclopedias for girls and boys,” a gender-segregated nonfiction genre that delineates conservative views of femininity and masculinity, serving as a form of sex education and behavioral guidance. This genre can be viewed as part of a broader “cultural backlash” following the fall of communism, analogous to trends in the West that fuel right-wing populism, albeit stemming from different historical contexts. This research investigates the interplay between the normative subjects constructed by these gendered encyclopedias and the agency of readers who may resist these prescribed ideologies. Utilizing qualitative methodology, the study analyzes internet comments from past readers, employing Maria Nikolajeva’s concept of the “identification fallacy” to understand the impact of these texts. Findings suggest that while these books create a shared communicative space for a generation of readers, regardless of gender, the intended imposition of conservative values is often met with irony and skepticism in adulthood, indicating a more nuanced impact on identity formation than the genre’s didactic nature presupposes. Along with reader reception, the social life (bytovanie) of these texts is also reconstructed: from practices of acquisition to transfer and censorship.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Références
COCKS, Neil. “The implied reader. Response and responsibility: Theories of the implied reader in children’s literature criticism”. In: Children’s literature: new approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004, pp. 93-117.
FERREDAY, Debra. Online Belongings. Oxford: Peter Lang UK, 2009.
INOZEMTSEV, I. “Amerikanskaia entsiklopedicheskaia kniga dlia mal’chikov” [American Encyclopedic Book for Boys]. Detskaia literatura, n. 9, 1936, p. 43.
KELLY, Catriona. Refining Russia: Advice literature, polite culture, and gender from Catherine to Yeltsin. Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2001.
LANOUX, Andrea. “Laundry, potatoes, and the everlasting soul: Russian advice literature for girls after communism”. The Russian Review, v. 73, n. 3, 2014, pp. 404-426.
LANOUX, Andrea, et al. Growing out of Communism: Russian Literature for Children and Teens, 1991-2017. Leiden: Brill; Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2022.
MARYL, Maciej. “The Anthropology of Literary Reading—Methodological Issues”. Teksty Drugie, n. 2, 2012, pp. 181-201.
MASLINSKAYA, Svetlana G.; ZAPADOVA, Tatiana G. “’Vot takoe eto pokolenie’: semeinoe chtenie v rakurse pokolencheskogo razryva” [‘This is the generation’: family reading from the perspective of the generational gap]. In: ASONOVA, E.A. (ed.). Chitatel’ v poiske. Moskva: Bibliomir, 2018, pp. 8-16.
MCCALLUM, Robyn. Ideologies of Identity in Adolescent Fiction: The Dialogic Construction of Subjectivity. London: Routledge, 2013.
MCROBBIE, Angela. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE, 2009.
NIKOLAJEVA, Maria. “Memory of the Present: Empathy and Identity in Young Adult Fiction”. Narrative Works, v. 4, n. 2, 2019, pp. 90-108.
NIKOLAJEVA, Maria. Power, Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers. London: Routledge, 2012.
ROGERS, Theresa. “Literary theory and children’s literature: Interpreting ourselves and our worlds”. Theory into practice, v. 38, n. 3, 1999, pp. 138-146.
SALMENNIEMI, Suvi; ADAMSON, Maria. “New Heroines of Labour: Domesticating Post-Feminism and Neoliberal Capitalism in Russia”. Sociology, v. 49, n. 1, 2015, pp. 88–105.
SCHOR, Juliet B. Born to buy: The Commercialized Child and the New Consumer Culture. New York: Scribner, 2005.
SCHWEBEL, Sara L. “The Limits of Agency for Children’s Literature Scholars”. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, v. 8, n. 1, 2016, pp. 278-290.
SERGIENKO, Inna A. “’Smert’ geroia’: siuzhet detskoi smerti v didakticheskoi proze kontsa XVIII veka” [‘Death of the Hero’: The Plot of a Child’s Death in Didactic Prose of the Late 18th Century]. Detskie chteniia, v. 1, n. 7, 2015, pp. 113–127.
SOTEVİK, Lena, et al. “Familiar Play: Age-Coded Heteronormativity in Swedish Early Childhood Education”. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, v. 27, n. 4, 2019, pp. 520–33.
ŚWIETLICKI, Mateusz. “Be Yourself… but Don’t Be a Wimp! Advice Literature in the USSR and Gender Roles in Contemporary Ukrainian Books for Girls and Boys”. Miscellanea Posttotalitariana Wratislaviensia, v. 7, 2018, pp. 73–85.
ŚWIETLICKI, Mateusz. “You Are Not a Doll, Not a Commodity! – Contemporary Ukrainian Advice Literature for Girls”. Slavia Occidentalis, n. 73/2, 2018, pp. 123–32.
WOOD, Elizabeth A. “February 23 and March 8: Two Holidays that Upstaged the February Revolution”. Slavic Review, v. 76, n. 3, 2017, pp. 732-740.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Yauheniya Lekarevich 2025
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Os autores que publicam na RUS concordam com os seguintes termos:
a. Os autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Os autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
