The play of creativity: the function of iconic signs in thought

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2025.238235

Keywords:

Creative thinking, Cognition, Perception, Abduction, Iconicity

Abstract

Creativity manifests itself as a productive capacity of thought, expressing flexibility and originality when approaching challenges and unusual situations. Innovative ideas seem to emerge spontaneously, being considered intuitions. Peirce criticized the Cartesian idea of ​​intuition, understood as any cognition not resulting from previous cognition processes that could serve as premises for deductions. For Peirce, knowledge is derived from external facts, apprehended by perception and processed through inferences mediated by signs, resulting from combinations of previous cognitions derived from previous judgments of experience. Although the apparent spontaneity of creative thought, which Peirce called abductive, does not seem to result from previous inferences, his conceptual framework demonstrates how creative thought works. Hence, this article seeks to evince: (a) that creative thought results from abductive inferential chains, whose premises are apprehended through perception; (b) that such premises are processed at a more or less unconscious level; (c) that these premises are iconic signs or present a high degree of iconicity, a type of mediation where predominate vagueness and openness inherent to the category of firstness; and (d) that it is possible to seek and use these signs capable of reflecting the unknown reality through human cognitive capacity, immersed in the phenomenal world. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Isabel Jungk, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo e Universidade de São Paulo

    Semioticista e Professora no curso de pós-graduação lato sensu em Cultura Material e Consumo: Perspectivas Semiopsicanalíticas da Escola de Comunicações e Artes da Universidade de São Paul0 (ECA-USP), São Paulo, Brasil.

References

BARRENA, Sara. La razón creativa. Madrid: Ediciones Rialp, 2007.

BONFANTINI, Massimo; PRONI, Giampaolo. Suposição: sim ou não? Eis a questão. In: ECO, Umberto; SEBEOK, Thomas (org.). O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004. pp. 131-147.

ECO, Umberto. Chifres, cascos, canelas: algumas hipóteses acerca de três tipos de abdução. In: ECO, Umberto; SEBEOK, Thomas (org.). O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004. pp. 219-243.

GHISELIN, Brewster. The Creative Process. New York: Mentor Books, 1952.

HAFNER, Klaus. August Kekulé — The architect of chemistry. Angewandte chemie, international edition in English, v. 18, n. 9, p. 641-706, 1979.

IBRI, Ivo Assad. Semiótica e pragmatismo. Marília: Oficina Universitária; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2020. v. 1.

JUNGK, Isabel. As categorias universais de Peirce e suas interconexões. In: SANTAELLA, Lucia; BORGES, Priscila (orgs.). A relevância de C. S. Peirce na atualidade. Barueri: Estação das Letras e Cores, 2021. pp. 129-141.

JUNGK, Isabel. Métodos para a Investigação do Real. TECCOGS: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, v. 12, p. 37-65, 2016. Disponível em: http://www4.pucsp.br/pos/tidd/teccogs/artigos/2015/edicao_12/teccogs12_artigo01.pdf. Acesso em: 25 maio 2025.

LALANDE, André. Vocabulário técnico e crítico da Filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.

MERRIAM-WEBSTER. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. USA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2005.

OSTROWER, Fayga. Criatividade e processos de criação. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1987.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. Org.: Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (v. 1–6); Arthur Burks (v. 7–8).

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Historical perspectives on Peirce’s logic of science. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton, 1985. Org. Carolyn Eisele (v. 1-2).

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1992. Org.: Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel (v. 1).

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1998. Org.: The Peirce Edition Project (v. 2).

SANTAELLA, Lucia. A percepção. São Paulo: Experimento, 1998.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. O método anticartesiano de C. S. Peirce. São Paulo: Unesp, 2004.

SANTAELLA, Lucia; NÖTH, Winfried. Imagem. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1999.

SANTAELLA, Lucia. Teoria geral dos signos. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning, 2000.

SEBEOK, Thomas; UMIKER-SEBEOK, Jean. “Você conhece meu método”. In: ECO, Umberto; SEBEOK, Thomas (org.). O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004. pp. 13-58.

STERNBERG, Robert Jeffrey (ed.). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

STERNBERG, Robert Jeffrey; LUBART, Todd. The concept of creativity. In: Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 3-15.

STRATHERN, Paul. O sonho de Mendeleiev. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2002.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Jungk, I. (2025). The play of creativity: the function of iconic signs in thought. Estudos Semióticos, 21(3), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2025.238235