The play of creativity: the function of iconic signs in thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2025.238235Keywords:
Creative thinking, Cognition, Perception, Abduction, IconicityAbstract
Creativity manifests itself as a productive capacity of thought, expressing flexibility and originality when approaching challenges and unusual situations. Innovative ideas seem to emerge spontaneously, being considered intuitions. Peirce criticized the Cartesian idea of intuition, understood as any cognition not resulting from previous cognition processes that could serve as premises for deductions. For Peirce, knowledge is derived from external facts, apprehended by perception and processed through inferences mediated by signs, resulting from combinations of previous cognitions derived from previous judgments of experience. Although the apparent spontaneity of creative thought, which Peirce called abductive, does not seem to result from previous inferences, his conceptual framework demonstrates how creative thought works. Hence, this article seeks to evince: (a) that creative thought results from abductive inferential chains, whose premises are apprehended through perception; (b) that such premises are processed at a more or less unconscious level; (c) that these premises are iconic signs or present a high degree of iconicity, a type of mediation where predominate vagueness and openness inherent to the category of firstness; and (d) that it is possible to seek and use these signs capable of reflecting the unknown reality through human cognitive capacity, immersed in the phenomenal world.
Downloads
References
BARRENA, Sara. La razón creativa. Madrid: Ediciones Rialp, 2007.
BONFANTINI, Massimo; PRONI, Giampaolo. Suposição: sim ou não? Eis a questão. In: ECO, Umberto; SEBEOK, Thomas (org.). O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004. pp. 131-147.
ECO, Umberto. Chifres, cascos, canelas: algumas hipóteses acerca de três tipos de abdução. In: ECO, Umberto; SEBEOK, Thomas (org.). O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004. pp. 219-243.
GHISELIN, Brewster. The Creative Process. New York: Mentor Books, 1952.
HAFNER, Klaus. August Kekulé — The architect of chemistry. Angewandte chemie, international edition in English, v. 18, n. 9, p. 641-706, 1979.
IBRI, Ivo Assad. Semiótica e pragmatismo. Marília: Oficina Universitária; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2020. v. 1.
JUNGK, Isabel. As categorias universais de Peirce e suas interconexões. In: SANTAELLA, Lucia; BORGES, Priscila (orgs.). A relevância de C. S. Peirce na atualidade. Barueri: Estação das Letras e Cores, 2021. pp. 129-141.
JUNGK, Isabel. Métodos para a Investigação do Real. TECCOGS: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, v. 12, p. 37-65, 2016. Disponível em: http://www4.pucsp.br/pos/tidd/teccogs/artigos/2015/edicao_12/teccogs12_artigo01.pdf. Acesso em: 25 maio 2025.
LALANDE, André. Vocabulário técnico e crítico da Filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.
MERRIAM-WEBSTER. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. USA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2005.
OSTROWER, Fayga. Criatividade e processos de criação. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1987.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958. Org.: Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (v. 1–6); Arthur Burks (v. 7–8).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Historical perspectives on Peirce’s logic of science. Berlin, New York, Amsterdam: Mouton, 1985. Org. Carolyn Eisele (v. 1-2).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1992. Org.: Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel (v. 1).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1998. Org.: The Peirce Edition Project (v. 2).
SANTAELLA, Lucia. A percepção. São Paulo: Experimento, 1998.
SANTAELLA, Lucia. O método anticartesiano de C. S. Peirce. São Paulo: Unesp, 2004.
SANTAELLA, Lucia; NÖTH, Winfried. Imagem. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1999.
SANTAELLA, Lucia. Teoria geral dos signos. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning, 2000.
SEBEOK, Thomas; UMIKER-SEBEOK, Jean. “Você conhece meu método”. In: ECO, Umberto; SEBEOK, Thomas (org.). O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004. pp. 13-58.
STERNBERG, Robert Jeffrey (ed.). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
STERNBERG, Robert Jeffrey; LUBART, Todd. The concept of creativity. In: Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 3-15.
STRATHERN, Paul. O sonho de Mendeleiev. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Isabel Jungk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors grant the journal all copyrights relating to the work published. The concepts expressed in signed articles are absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.