Communication, evidentiary discipline
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v1i2p73-88Keywords:
fi eld of communication, evidentiary paradigm, epistemological models, inferenceAbstract
This article is a refl ection upon the presence of case studies in research on the fi eld of communication, relating them to the evidentiary paradigm. It considers as traits of this epistemological model: case studies; the search for evidence in order to grasp more complex phenomena; the distinction between essential and accidental evidence; and the articulation among diff erent pieces of evidence in order to build inferences. As for the articulated evidence, it considers the construction of interpretative models on two levels of inference: about the internal working rules of a case and about its inclusion into contexts that might be of interest to the researcher.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-04-15
Issue
Section
Dossier
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal for non-commercial purposes.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Braga, J. L. (2008). Communication, evidentiary discipline. MATRIZes, 1(2), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v1i2p73-88